Just letting you guys know that I wasnt lying about
beta 2 being ready for release. Unfortunately, were still waiting for
the Ognl 2.6.4 final release (I got a pre-release version this morning, but
there were a couple problems).
I wanted to let you all know what the state of WebWork
How far does this stray from the WW2 way of doing things? Are you basically
replacing the XWork interceptors with your interceptor that delegates to the
Spring interceptor then?
Also, could you build the mappings by putting some @webwork.spring tags and
using xdoclet to generate the mapping
UPSIDE INTERNATIONAL - Searching Out Stocks with Big Upside Potential...that have gone
unnoticed until now.
UpSide International uncovers unusual trends and activity in stocks. We look for
signs of block trades and insider purchasing in order to uncover insight into uncommon
trends.
Seven
Hi,
What is the the purpose of the result code returned
from ActionInvocation.invoke()? I can't find anywhere in the code that it
is used? Also, any comments on my plan to implement an
ExceptionHandlerInterceptor like so:
ExceptionHandlerInterceptor catches all Exceptions and checks to see
I have a class with ActionSupport with these methods:
void setNumber(Integer number)
Integer getNumber()
Vector getLargeNumbers(Integer smallestNumber)
how do i call the getLargeNumbers(4) from my velocity template ?
i gave tryed
#foreach($number in $largeNumbers(4))
Large number:
Hi,
does someone know why following code doesn't render correctly when SiteMesh
is involved?
%@ taglib uri=webwork prefix=ww %
html
head
titleWebwork 2 Demo/title
/head
body
pbWebwork 2 - Demo 5 Big and complte example!!/b/p
ww:form action='demo5Step1.action'
ww:textfield label='Skriv
Use $action.getLargeNumbers(4) instead.
Cheers,
Dag
David Nielsen wrote:
I have a class with ActionSupport with these methods:
void setNumber(Integer number)
Integer getNumber()
Vector getLargeNumbers(Integer smallestNumber)
how do i call the getLargeNumbers(4) from my velocity template ?
i
Can I specify an array of strings when using the param tag within an
action tag?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE
Is your implementation of this code closed source, or are you able to
share it ?
I would be keen to have a look.
Cheers,
Cameron
Rob Rudin wrote:
Cameron - I'm using the latter approach, although this is with
1.3, and I've unfortunately been lazy and haven't looked into
WW2 yet. But I
I've still been mulling this over, despite the humour here, and I still
think that this exception handling thing is a Good Idea.
WW2/XW wouldn't need it, because the interceptors presumably would serve
the same role, but WW1 users tend to have a certain, very similar approach
to handling this
Title: Message
The
result code is mapped to a result based on the configuration (i.e. "success" is
mapped to a JSP, etc)
I'm
not sure of your logic... the executed property is there to tell if the result
has been executed (maybe it should be renamed)... If the result has not been
I really don't think it's a good idea to be adding this kind of stuff.
Besides the fact that we just decided a similar functionality shouldn't
be added to XW and WW, it surely shouldn't be added to the 1.x line.
-Pat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Title: Message
Getting a bit tired Jason? Hard work
answering all these questions!
I was actually asking about the result code
returned from the ActionInvocation.invoke() method not the Action.invoke()
method. The later is used to fetch a Result from the action config to
execute after the
Is the webwork-ext project setup? This seems like a perfect candidate (if this is open source).
Cheers,
matthew
On Nov 4, 2003, at 8:18 AM, Cameron Braid wrote:
Is your implementation of this code closed source, or are you able to share it ?
I would be keen to have a look.
Cheers,
Cameron
Also, my logic stated that if the result HAS been executed then we
can assume that the result HAS been executed
can't argue with that logic :)
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be
Hi Daniel,
Have you tried the tags without the single quotes like this:
%@ taglib uri=webwork prefix=ww %
html
head
titleWebwork 2 Demo/title
/head
body
pbWebwork 2 - Demo 5 Big and complte example!!/b/p ww:form
action=demo5Step1.action
ww:textfield label=Skriv ett meddelande
just in case some of you guys dont visit theserverside.com, theres an
article up on there about ww2.. check it out!
http://www.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=WebWork2
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Is there somewhere where I can download a current
build of webwork 2? I've downloaded the source, but it would not build (the
project file is a bit out of date).
Cheers,
Ross
Title: lil' tool to help w/ template refactoring
This is cool stuff! As soon as the
webwork-ext project is created lets make sure this kind of stuff is added in
there. Great work!
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL
PS: I'm against adding features to the 1.x codeline that the 2.x
codeline won't need -- that just makes the migration that much
trickier. At this point, anything added to 1.x should be added to 2.x,
unless of course it already exists in 2.x
-Pat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, the single quotes should be in place as of a couple weeks ago.
It _should_ work under SiteMesh. In fact, I just closed two open bugs
about that. Will need to recheck I suppose.
-Pat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Peter White
Not sure if this is supported -- never tried. Maybe via the type
conversion stuff?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
James Cook
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 6:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Array of Strings in action
NICE STUFF! This will go a long way to helping us get 2.0 final out.
One thing though --
Kris,
Do you know that the xwork.xml file you're using is more complex than it
needs to be? Generally entries can be as simple as:
action name=foo class=com.acme.Foo
result name=success/success.vm/result
Unfortunately, no. Ill bitch some
more :)
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew E. Porter
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003
8:54 AM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Anyone
working on Spring Framework Integration?
Of course, this cuts both ways, I'd welcome (nay, encourage!)
submissions for patches that port 2.x features back into 1.x
On Nov 4, 2003, at 11:36 PM, Patrick Lightbody wrote:
PS: I'm against adding features to the 1.x codeline that the 2.x
codeline won't need -- that just makes the migration
Agreed! We already backported support for having views be parsed to do
view.jsp?id=${id}. Any others we can do?
-Pat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hani Suleiman
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 8:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
ok i've seen this question asked too many times, so i've gone ahead and
created a Webwork2 FAQ, see:
http://wiki.opensymphony.com:8080/space/Webwork2+FAQ
Ross Mason wrote:
Is there somewhere where I can download a current build of webwork 2?
I've downloaded the source, but it would not build
Is there any interest (or objections) regarding moving action class
reloading into ww1.3 core? I've had a couple of requests for that. It
is currently an extra jar that duplicates a lot of what is available in
core, so moving it in would basically involve checking in a classloader
and a couple
Thanks for that.
BTW the maven build for the projects doesn't currently work i.e. maven jar
Ross
- Original Message -
From: Francisco Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] [webwork2] Stable/Nightly build
Hi,
I'm new to webwork2 and have inherited some code. Most of the tags in this
code seem to refer to a doDefault() method on the ActionSupport. That seems
to have dissappeared in the latest code? Is there an equivilent method? or
is it no longer used? and how was it used?
Cheers,
Ross
Hah, please ignore me, but...
Who would have thought, a non-functional maven build! That must be a
first surely.
I really do look forward to the day when I stop spasming uncontrollably
and frothing at the mouth whenever I bump into maven. As soon as I feel
the healing has begun,
31 matches
Mail list logo
