Re: [OS-webwork] [webwork2] Stable/Nightly build

2003-11-05 Thread Ross Mason
Easy Tiger. I won't mention M-A-*-E-N again... - Original Message - From: Hani Suleiman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:54 PM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] [webwork2] Stable/Nightly build Hah, please ignore me, but... Who would have thought,

Re: [OS-webwork] ActionInvocation result

2003-11-05 Thread John Patterson
Title: Message My ExceptionHandlerInterceptor works like this: When an exception is caught the interceptor sets the Exception into the ActionContext and tries to create an instance of the "error" result and execute it (some refactoring of ActionInvocation would have made this easier). If

RE: [OS-webwork] SiteMesh + Webwork 2?

2003-11-05 Thread Daniel Pfeifer
Yes, i did try without quotes but the problem is that without quotes it doesn't even work without SiteMesh (I guess because OGNL needs to know that it is a string literal). -Original Message- From: Peter White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 4 november 2003 20:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OS-webwork] what happened to ActionSupport.doDefault()?

2003-11-05 Thread Francisco Hernandez
that would be Action.execute() and say you want to execute another method you can do: action name=myAction class=action.MyAction method=doDefault Ross Mason wrote: Hi, I'm new to webwork2 and have inherited some code. Most of the tags in this code seem to refer to a doDefault() method on the

RE: [OS-webwork] article on webwork2 at theserverside.com

2003-11-05 Thread Thompson, Christopher (Kris)
I didn't know that, but what result type is it? Does it default to Dispatcher? What would the action look like that was of type chain like the following action name=RegisterAction class=com.flyingbuttress.wafer.actions.RegisterAction result name=input type=dispatcher

RE: [OS-webwork] article on webwork2 at theserverside.com

2003-11-05 Thread Jason Carreira
!-- from the webwork-default.xml -- default-interceptor-ref name=validationWorkflowStack / action name=RegisterAction class=com.flyingbuttress.wafer.actions.RegisterAction result name=input/register.jsp/result result name=success type=chainLoginAction/result

[OS-webwork] Config browser?

2003-11-05 Thread CVillela
Title: Config browser? Hi folks! After looking at Dag Liodden's wicked cool screenshots showing the config browser with graphical displays of the Action and Result mappings, I felt curious about the old config browser, and tried to put it to work, with no success... what is needed to get

[OS-webwork] OGNL list question again

2003-11-05 Thread Jonas Eriksson
Hi! I can not understand why I get arrays (instead of Strings) when OGNL populates my list in my action! In action: // Use OgnlList so we don't get out of bounds private List theList = new OgnlList(String.class) public List getList() { return theList; } In view: input type=text

Re: [OS-webwork] what happened to ActionSupport.doDefault()?

2003-11-05 Thread Ross Mason
Great. Thanks - Original Message - From: Francisco Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 10:33 PM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] what happened to ActionSupport.doDefault()? that would be Action.execute() and say you want to execute another

Re: [OS-webwork] article on webwork2 at theserverside.com

2003-11-05 Thread Francisco Hernandez
oh cool i knew about leaving the param location out but didnt know about type defaulting to dispatcher, another one of these little tricks that needs to get documented somewhere :) Jason Carreira wrote: !-- from the webwork-default.xml -- default-interceptor-ref

[OS-webwork] [ww2/xw1] Actions in JavaScript other languages

2003-11-05 Thread CVillela
Title: [ww2/xw1] Actions in JavaScript other languages Hi all! :) How's the support in WebWork2 and XWork for creating actions in _javascript_ or other BeanShell languages? I see that js.jar is included in the XWork lib dirs, but I don't see any trace of an ActionInvocation or ActionProxy

Re: [OS-webwork] Add PushTag to WW1.3

2003-11-05 Thread Hani Suleiman
Go for it! On Nov 5, 2003, at 12:00 PM, Dick Zetterberg wrote: Hi there, I would like to add a push tag to the 1.3 branch and I just want to check that there are no objections to this. Why do I want to add it when we can do the same with the property tag already? Because the property tag is

[OS-webwork] Add PushTag to WW1.3

2003-11-05 Thread Dick Zetterberg
Hi there, I would like to add a push tag to the 1.3 branch and I just want to check that there are no objections to this. Why do I want to add it when we can do the same with the property tag already? Because the property tag is inefficient when used for this purpose. This is because it

RE: [OS-webwork] [webwork2] Stable/Nightly build

2003-11-05 Thread Patrick Lightbody
As for the originally question -- we're close to getting nightly builds (just need Hani's help with this). As for an actual release, we've been at beta 2 stage for over a week, but due to Ognl 2.6.4 not coming out, we're holding off. In the meantime, we're just spending time on compatibility and

RE: [OS-webwork] action reloading

2003-11-05 Thread Patrick Lightbody
Hani, I'd like to see this included in 2.0 as well. Can you give me a brief understanding how this works? Does WebWork use it's own classoader? -Pat -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hani Suleiman Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 9:16 PM