RE: [OS-webwork] WW1.3 Memory Consumption

Hi Hani As soon as 1.3 is running well, I'll do some testing on 1.4. -Paolo > -Original Message- > From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 6:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WW1.3 Memory Consumption > > > Hi Paolo, >

Re: [OS-webwork] view data

On Feb 5, 2004, at 7:57 Uhr, Jason Carreira wrote: Your form field params will be set onto your Action... You can choose in your execute() whether to keep these values or to get some other values and set them before returning to be rendered... how is it handled though if a value with the same nam

Re: [OS-webwork] WW1.3 Memory Consumption

I just looked briefly at the source. It says you are the author, so maybe you should know best? :-) Anyway, there is one method addParameter in WebTable that calls BeanUtil.setProperty that will use the Query class. Perhaps that is the one leading to your problems. Without knowing much about the c

Re: [OS-webwork] Custom Date Editor Not Invoked

Hi, I have only read the first page of your post but from that I believe that your initialization of BeanUtil is the problem. By doing the call: BeanUtil.getPropertyEditor(Date.class); you actually force BeanUtil to fetch the editor from the PropertyEditorManager, and this will be the Webwork ed

Re: [OS-webwork] Appending a Parameter to a String in the Value Attribute

You cannot concatenate Strings in Webwork 1.x using the + operator, yet. So what you have written does not work. You can solve it by creating a utility bean with a set of concat methods that you call instead. You could then change the param tag to: This would call a concat method in the concatBea

[OS-webwork] Custom Date Editor Not Invoked

Hello,   I wrote my own date editor class, and cannot figure out why it is not being used by WebWork.  (Assume I need a custom date editor.)  I can successfully register it with PropertyEditorManager, and verify that it is registered when my action goes to save an object with dates, but I'm

[OS-webwork] Listar: Post sent to moderator.

>> Post to list staroffice.forum >> Subject: Post submitted to moderator for reason: Non-member submission to closed-post list. --- Gestionnaire de liste Listar/0.42 - fin de traitement/job execution complete. --- The SF.Net email is sponsor

[OS-webwork] US-STOCK-MARKET--Groundbreaking HealthCare Technology: MYOELECTRIC PROSTHESES--Numpy-discussion

Numpy-discussion - Here is your requested report - #27482998 Stock-Market Spotlight - PDPR HealhCare Tech Sector: PDPR - Pediatric Prosthetics Inc. Reveals Projected Earnings Very exciting news from the HealthCare Tech Sector and its Groundbreaking Technology: MYOELECTRIC PROSTHESES HOUSTON--(

Re: [OS-webwork] WW1.3 Memory Consumption

Hi Paolo, I just tested this and I don't see the behaviour you describe in the current CVS. Can you try webwork 1.4 and see if you still have the leak? On Feb 5, 2004, at 11:05 AM, Vedovato Paolo wrote: Ok, I Found some more on this issue. This Query problems occur only when the tag is used.

Re: [OS-webwork] WW1.4 - what happened to supporting jars?

src is there for people who need to view the source, not necessarily build it! if you want, I can throw up a 1.4.src.zip on java.net, that's a cvs export of the 1.4 sources. On Feb 5, 2004, at 11:41 AM, Wayland Chan wrote: I found all the jars within the webwork.war file that is included in t

RE: [OS-webwork] WW1.4 - what happened to supporting jars?

I found all the jars within the webwork.war file that is included in this zip. I was expecting a full distribution that could be built but it seems this download only includes a prebuilt dist. No build.xml either. If this is a binary download, why bother including all the src? And before anyone

Re: [OS-webwork] WW1.4 - what happened to supporting jars?

They're in the example app (hopefully) On Feb 5, 2004, at 11:18 AM, Wayland Chan wrote: I grabbed the 1.4 release (webwork-1.4.zip) from the download link off the OS site. What happened to all the external jars that used to be in the \lib\supporting-jars directory? Is it only available throug

[OS-webwork] WW1.4 - what happened to supporting jars?

I grabbed the 1.4 release (webwork-1.4.zip) from the download link off the OS site. What happened to all the external jars that used to be in the \lib\supporting-jars directory? Is it only available through CVS? Ciao! Wayland Chan email: wchanATtrekspaceDOTcom ---

RE: [OS-webwork] WW1.3 Memory Consumption

Ok, I Found some more on this issue. This Query problems occur only when the tag is used. As far as i see in my Profiling Tool the WebTable component tries to do something 'illegal' in the doEndTag. It always tries to find something in this form [EMAIL PROTECTED] and of course this reference

RE: [OS-webwork] view data

Your form field params will be set onto your Action... You can choose in your execute() whether to keep these values or to get some other values and set them before returning to be rendered... > -Original Message- > From: Florian Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February

RE: [OS-webwork] WW1.3 Memory Consumption

It's caching Query instances... It must be that in your load test the Queries are not the same each time (or at least WW thinks they're not) so it's caching all of the new instances and they just keep building up... > -Original Message- > From: Paolo Vedovato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > S

RE: [OS-webwork] Re: Velocity Tools

The bean macro is a simple solution, but it does not seem like a good replacement for the Velocity Tools. I've only briefly looked at Velocity Tools, so I'm no expert, but it provides for the initialization of tools based on scope, and also can provide initialization parameters such as the HttpS

[OS-webwork] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken.

ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s). Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject = [OS-webwork] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Scanning time = 2/5/2004 8:36:09 AM Engine/Pattern = 6.810-1005/1.753.00 Action on virus

Re: [OS-webwork] example of using xwork with spring integration

*i've been able to get spring integration going now by following the directions covered in jira issue XW-122 but I have one last question, where can I get most up to date versions of classes in com.atlassian.xwork.ext? ie: com.atl

Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Velocity Tools

Thank´s     Volnei Granado Munhoz Programador de Sistemas Jr. Unopar - Coordenadoria de Informática Visite nosso Portal: www.unopar.br (43) 3371-7928 - Original Message - From: Jonas Eriksson

[OS-webwork] failure notice

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at wmg12b.wmgitalia.biz. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Questo indirizzo non esiste oppure e stato cancellato --- Below this li

[OS-webwork] Re: Velocity Tools

I don't think there exist a proper velocity tool support in ww2. Search the mailing list archive for "velocity tool support" and you will find something about tools supports that Matt Ho created (and later on removed I think..) Use the macro #bean for a simple solution. Cheers Jonas Volnei wrot

[OS-webwork] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim). A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP error from remote mailer after end of data: host

[OS-webwork] Velocity Tools

  How to use velocity tools with webwork 2? <>

[OS-webwork] Velocity Tools

  Volnei Granado Munhoz Programador de Sistemas Jr. Unopar - Coordenadoria de Informática Visite nosso Portal: www.unopar.br (43) 3371-7928   <>

[OS-webwork] Non autorisé

L'adresse Email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) n'est pas autorisée à poster sur la liste [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activi

RE: [OS-webwork] WW1.3 Memory Consumption

Just a clarification to my previous mail: What I can't explain and seems wrong to me is that when I do the same load test again and again the instance count of Query and QuerySegment grows. What I instead expected was that after the first load test, the instance count wouldn't grow anymore. As

RE: [OS-webwork] WW1.3 Memory Consumption

Hi Dick for my replies see inline. > You are right that the Query class contains a cache of all expressions > (instances of Query). It is a static HashMap in WW1.3 so it > is never GC'd as > you know. > I can see a couple of cases that would make it grow: > > 1. Parameters that are sent in requ