Drew McAuliffe wrote:
That's consistent with numbers I've found in migrating one app from 1.3 to
2.0. I've always held out hope that this was just something that
optimization could take care of. In the meantime, my performance isn't
terrible, but it doesn't fly like it did in 1.3, either. Here's
PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Lightbody [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WebWork [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 4:43 AM
Subject: [OS-webwork] EL Performance Between 1.3 and 2.0
I've finished the backwards support for the 1.3 EL and have migrated the
first mini-app
Dick Zetterberg wrote:
Just out of curiosity, did you measure against the released version of 1.3 or the CVS
version?
Did you use JSP or Velocity for presentation?
Could you perhaps post your testcases here so that we may have a look at them and
perhaps try them ourselves?
I'd also be
ago. I'll keep at it.
-Pat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matt Ho
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 11:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] EL Performance Between 1.3 and 2.0
Dick Zetterberg wrote:
Just out of curiosity
I've finished the backwards support for the 1.3 EL and have migrated the
first mini-app over from 1.3 to 2.0 with almost zero effort: the
monthlist test.
I wanted to share the performance numbers:
* WebWork 1.3 scored 80ms
* WebWork 2.0 w/ old EL support scored 550ms
* WebWork 2.0 w/ new EL
] On Behalf Of
Patrick Lightbody
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 7:43 PM
To: WebWork
Subject: [OS-webwork] EL Performance Between 1.3 and 2.0
I've finished the backwards support for the 1.3 EL and have migrated the
first mini-app over from 1.3 to 2.0 with almost zero effort: the monthlist
test.
I wanted
