Rickard,
This has been brought up before, I think, but I'm not sure it was answered
well enough. What about people that want to use XML, Velocity, Jasper
Reports, or some other view technology?
You are using JSP to include the actions, but how would you do that with
XML, for example?
Blake Day
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't you all rename WebWork to XWork
because WebWork was a misnomer? If the framework remains web-centric, why
not just call it WebWork 1.4?
Blake Day
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 03:29 AM, Rickard Öberg wrote:
This is a very difficult question.
My point precisely. I think, given the current culture of XWork, we're
looking at WW 2.0 (major revision change) instead of XWork... and the
webwork name becomes appropriate.
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Michael Blake Day wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't you all rename WebWork to XWork
Philipp Meier wrote:
These are the core concepts that I can think of. Now, for my own
portlet-ish needs (which I hope will be more common for others too in
the future) the following applies:
* Actions and Components, and their resulting views, are ALWAYS called
through a servlet include. This
Peter Kelley wrote:
Good to have you back
I'm not back. I'm trying to see whether it's any point in me restarting
the XWork.
Are views a core concept ?
Tricky one. Yes, I guess they should be, somehow.
The other thing we might want to address is
whether or not XWork will be somewhat
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rickard Öberg
Sent: den 11 januari 2003 09:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XWork: core concepts
Peter Kelley wrote:
Good to have you back
I'm not back. I'm trying to see whether it's any point in me restarting
the XWork.
Are views a core
+1
- Original Message -
From: Hani Suleiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 6:29 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XWork: core concepts
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 03:29 AM, Rickard Öberg wrote:
This is a very difficult question. Separating
It could be possible to add a flag for whether includes are mandatory or
not.
Seems like this is exactly what interceptors are for. You don't want to have
actions accessible directly from a url? Then add the interceptor that
prevents it.
Anders Hovmöller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A little poll:
As long as you are aware that any result from this poll is basically
meaningless I'm fine with this. It was pretty obvious last time this type of
thing was asked on the mailing list (URLTag) and it was acted on the result,
that the response that was given was grossly misleading.
boxed wrote:
It could be possible to add a flag for whether includes are mandatory or
not.
Seems like this is exactly what interceptors are for. You don't want to have
actions accessible directly from a url? Then add the interceptor that
prevents it.
Good point. That would work.
/Rickard
Making unnecessary changes, IMHO, is definitely 'making it unpleasant'.
While I see that backward compatibility is too hard to keep (or so I'm
told) given all that people want xwork to be, I really dislike the
approach of change for changes sake. I deliberately avoided the very
early versions
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 11:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XWork: core concepts
I would highly recommend against going down this path.
Otherwise, just focus on WebWork 1.4. Plus, even if all our
actions are used for the web, remember
All,
Since quite a few of you disagreed with my resignation as XWork
architect, I've given some thought to how it would be possible to merge
my requirements with those that you have. It might be possible to do it,
and if so I would reconsider re-starting my work on XWork. I'd like to
begin
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:59:06AM +0100, Rickard Öberg wrote:
These are the core concepts that I can think of. Now, for my own
portlet-ish needs (which I hope will be more common for others too in
the future) the following applies:
* Actions and Components, and their resulting views, are
Rickard,
These are great, I've placed them on the Wiki (Which is now linked from the
main site, yay!).
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: Rickard Ã-berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WebWork [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:59 AM
Subject: [OS-webwork] XWork: core concepts
All
15 matches
Mail list logo
