Yes, the order of, not related, elements is constrained in XML.
-Original Message-
The problem was that the order of these elements was not the same as in
the error message above. Is this how it should be? (I don't know very
much about xml and parsing but it seems pretty stupid if the
The change was that I turned on XML validation.
The order is constrained, but doesn't necessarily have to be, if people
think it shouldn't be... I've made some of the sub-elements not choosy
about the order of their sub-elements because it was a pain
Jason
-Original Message-
From:
Ok, in this case they are constrained to the specific order made in the
dtd. Either this has to get into the docs (easy solution) or the dtd may
be changed to allow any order (which I think also leads to changes in
the XmlConfigurationProvider; it's supposed all elements but action are
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Order of elements in xwork.xml
Ok, in this case they are constrained to the specific order
made in the
dtd. Either this has to get into the docs (easy solution) or
the dtd may
be changed to allow any order (which I think also leads to
changes
]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Order of elements in xwork.xml
Great!
But for those who don't read or understand the DTD the correct order
should be mentioned in the docs.
/Jonas
Jason Carreira wrote:
I've added the DTD to the Wiki... I think they need to remain
constrained for the reason
