On Dienstag, 8. April 2008, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
On Thursday 03 April 2008 03:09, Tim Brown wrote:
Quick answer. In my opinion it makes sense.
to start with integrating glib it might make sense to
migrate the GNU getopt stuff (currently maintained as
a copy in openvas-libraries) to
On Thursday 03 April 2008 03:09, Tim Brown wrote:
Quick answer. In my opinion it makes sense.
to start with integrating glib it might make sense to
migrate the GNU getopt stuff (currently maintained as
a copy in openvas-libraries) to the methods offered by
glib
Quick answer. In my opinion it makes sense.
Tim
--
Tim Brown
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.nth-dimension.org.uk/
___
Openvas-discuss mailing list
Openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to discuss a long-standing open question about about using
external, widely-used libraries in favour of self-maintained copies or
self-brewn implementations.
I am aware that there is no simple answer.
Among others, the discussion was avout the
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 21:28, Rodney Thayer wrote:
Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
I'd like to hear some opinions about this question.
What strategy should OpenVAS follow?
when I've found myself complaining about some open source project's
use (or mis-use, or unfortunately non-portable use)
