Re: [Openvpn-devel] Summary of the "OpenVPN development model" meeting

2010-01-27 Thread David Sommerseth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 20/01/10 15:15, Samuli Seppänen wrote: > >> On Jan 20, 2010, at 04:39:18, Samuli Seppänen wrote: >> >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I dug a little deeper into Trac and to Redmine, which was another >>> candidate for the (developer) site. I took a look at

Re: [Openvpn-devel] win32 openvpn-2.1.1 has bug with "nobind"?

2010-01-27 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 09:32:05PM +1300, Jason Haar wrote: > On 01/27/2010 09:17 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > > Is this a single server listening on both ports, or is this two independent > > servers? > > server running openvpn on tcp:1195 and udp:1195 So it's two independent processes. > > (

[Openvpn-devel] Community meetings in #openvpn-discussion on Thursdays at 19:00 UTC (starting tomorrow)

2010-01-27 Thread Samuli Seppänen
Hi all, I talked to James yesterday and we agreed that we should have the weekly developer/community meeting on Thursdays at 19:00 UTC (starting tomorrow). The idea is to keep the meetings pretty informal, but discuss specific issues when necessary. Given this short notice I can't promise James is

Re: [Openvpn-devel] win32 openvpn-2.1.1 has bug with "nobind"?

2010-01-27 Thread Jason Haar
On 01/27/2010 09:17 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > Is this a single server listening on both ports, or is this two independent > servers? > > server running openvpn on tcp:1195 and udp:1195 client running openvpn with "nobind". client connects to server via "remote server.name 1195 tcp", "lsof -ni

Re: [Openvpn-devel] win32 openvpn-2.1.1 has bug with "nobind"?

2010-01-27 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 04:17:56PM +1300, Jason Haar wrote: > Confirmed. I have a server running on 1194 tcp and udp and Is this a single server listening on both ports, or is this two independent servers? (For a customer installation, I need a single server to listen on UDP/1194 and TCP/4

Re: [Openvpn-devel] win32 openvpn-2.1.1 has bug with "nobind"?

2010-01-27 Thread Jason Haar
I have been googling around and others reported this back in 2005! Looking at the code (I'm no programmer), there seems to be a hint that the "nobind" option only works for TCP - not UDP? Is this true? There's no reason for it that I can think of, but it would explain what I'm seeing: in UDP mode