On 04/04/17 08:30, Simon Matter wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 08:29:49AM +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
>>> Interesting to see that there is zero interest in this patch here.
>>
>> This is a misinterpretation.
>>
>
> Hi Gert,
>
> Thanks for the explanation, I'll be patient then :)
As
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 08:29:49AM +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
>> Interesting to see that there is zero interest in this patch here.
>
> This is a misinterpretation.
>
Hi Gert,
Thanks for the explanation, I'll be patient then :)
If it's preferred for the patch to keep it even simpler
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 08:29:49AM +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
> Interesting to see that there is zero interest in this patch here.
This is a misinterpretation.
If you monitor the list, it has been fairly quiet since 2.4.0 release -
the active core of openvpn developers have all been busy
Hi,
>> Hi,
>>
>> Initially I've created this RFE but have been told to send it to
>> the devel list instead:
>>
>> https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/ticket/865
>>
>> Unfortunately I'm not a developer and have never used git so please bear
>> with me as I send a classic patch to the list.
>>
> Hi,
>
> Initially I've created this RFE but have been told to send it to
> the devel list instead:
>
> https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/ticket/865
>
> Unfortunately I'm not a developer and have never used git so please bear
> with me as I send a classic patch to the list.
>
> As suggested
Hi,
Initially I've created this RFE but have been told to send it to
the devel list instead:
https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/ticket/865
Unfortunately I'm not a developer and have never used git so please bear
with me as I send a classic patch to the list.
As suggested by user "syzzer" I
