Hi,
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 08:41:25PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 02:19:38PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote:
> > This makes a lot of sense to me. Our project doesn't really benefit in
> > general of running our tests parallel.
> >
> > This gets an ACK from me. I just
Hi,
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 02:19:38PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote:
> This makes a lot of sense to me. Our project doesn't really benefit in
> general of running our tests parallel.
>
> This gets an ACK from me. I just tested your change locally, and it
> seems to work very well.
Thanks
On 24/05/15 21:30, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> somewhere between automake-1.11 and automake-1.14 the default for handling
> "make check" changed from "serial-tests" to "parallel-tests" - which
> sounds harmless, but has the interesting side effect of hiding the output
> of all (potentially
Hi,
somewhere between automake-1.11 and automake-1.14 the default for handling
"make check" changed from "serial-tests" to "parallel-tests" - which
sounds harmless, but has the interesting side effect of hiding the output
of all (potentially parallel-run) test scripts until the summary at the
Hi,
somewhere between automake-1.11 and automake-1.14 the default for handling
"make check" changed from "serial-tests" to "parallel-tests" - which
sounds harmless, but has the interesting side effect of hiding the output
of all (potentially parallel-run) test scripts until the summary at the
