Hello Selva
Just guessing, is the server on a Linode? I had once briefly tested a similar
setup and, for some reason, the throughput on ipv6 connections was very poor.
Once your setup is working I would love to hear about the performance.
Yeah the Server that I'm getting access to is one he
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/08/15 11:55, Rui Santos wrote:
On 20-08-2015 18:40, David Sommerseth wrote: On 20/08/15 19:11,
debbie...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message - From: Rui Santos
rsan...@grupopie.com To:
openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent:
On 21-08-2015 13:45, David Sommerseth wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/08/15 11:55, Rui Santos wrote:
On 20-08-2015 18:40, David Sommerseth wrote: On 20/08/15 19:11,
debbie...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message - From: Rui Santos
rsan...@grupopie.com To:
Hi John,
and a route on the server to the 4d09::/64 through the tunnel. Please
show us the routes on the server too.
ip -6 route
2600:::4d00::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric
256 pref medium
2600:::4dff::/64 dev tun1 proto kernel
Doing a quick dirty (one run only) download comparison from my LAN (that's
behind the router, firewall, switch, etc etc).
In this test, the IPv4 traffic is going out locally, through my ISP, and the
IPv6 traffic is going over the VPN.
rm -f linux*tar.gz \
time wget -4
P.S. By the way, if you are doing this only for ipv6 traffic (ie.,
encryption is not required), its much easier to manage a 6in4 tunnel to the
Linode. That's what I ended up doing although I still have some performance
issues..
I can't because we figured out that the ISP blocks protocol 41.
Hi Selva
What about ip6tables settings on the router? On my asus router the default
was to DROP all, so I had to change those.
I have explicit blanket ACCEPT all enabled with verbose logging for all the
prefixes we're dealing with :-/
- John
Some more info on what I see on the firewalls.
On the LOCAL-ROUTER, testing the 2 pingtypes, with and without the added
address
without
ping6 -c1 2600:x:x:4dff::1
PING 2600:x:x:4dff::1(2600:x:x:4dff::1) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 2600:x:x:4dff::1:
Crossed in the mail! :-)
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015, at 11:49 AM, Selva Nair wrote:
may be an iroute is required
Just checked the man page -- it should be iroute-ipv6 in the ccd. I also
realized you could use route-ipv6 in the same ccd file to set up the route
to 4d09 in the system routing
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015, at 11:43 AM, Selva Nair wrote:
So the packet is dropped by the VPN? I dont have access to my config right
now, but may be an iroute is required in the config or ccd as in the ipv4
case of routing LAN clients through VPN. Please check the man page on
iroute.
I had added
Hi Selva
Can you ping from the server to the router's 4d09::1 address?
From the shell on the REMOTE-SERVER, I CAN'T ping6 to the LOCAL-ROUTER's
internal eth1 interface IP
ping6 2600:x:x:4d09::1
PING 2600:x:x:4d09::1(2600:x:x:4d09::1) 56 data bytes
Just sits there.
I got pointed to testing for good mtus
Dropping from 1500, these values give 0% packet loss
ping -M do -s 1472 -c 1 google.com
ping6 -M do -s 1452 -c 1 google.com
anything higher, 100% loss.
I read too MSS == MTU - 40
So for IPv4 MSS= 1432
Which I guess I set with
mssfix 1432
So
On 20-08-2015 18:40, David Sommerseth wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/08/15 19:11, debbie...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message - From: Rui Santos
rsan...@grupopie.com To: openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 3:10 PM
On 20-08-2015 22:14, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
Hi Rui,
Hi Jan,
On 20/08/15 21:19, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 20/08/15 21:16, debbie...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message - From: David Sommerseth
openvpn.l...@topphemmelig.net
To: debbie...@gmail.com; Rui Santos rsan...@grupopie.com
14 matches
Mail list logo
