On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Stefan Szabo
wrote:
> hi,
>
> without proto tcp declaration it doesnt try over tcp, all that is doing is
> udp.
>
> if the first line is proto tcp, the first connection is over tcp, after
> that jumps over UDP.UDP is tried for 5 times
hi,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:14:26PM -0400, Selva Nair wrote:
> Why? Because of this line in the config:
>
> persist-remote-ip
[..]
> That will keep trying X:1194 only with whatever protocol is defined before
> those lines (or udp by default), if persist-remote-ip is also specified.
> This is
Hi Gert,
Yes the problem remains (see below)..
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> hi,
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:14:26PM -0400, Selva Nair wrote:
> > Why? Because of this line in the config:
> >
> > persist-remote-ip
> [..]
> > That will keep trying
- Original Message -
From: "Gert Doering"
To: "Selva Nair"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 7:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] client config fallback from 1194 udp to 80 tcp
>> Why? Because of this
Hi Folks
sorry to chime in late (and unsolicited)
Am 21.10.2015 um 22:48 schrieb Gert Doering:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 04:37:57PM -0400, Selva Nair wrote:
>> If I'm not mistaken, persist-remote-ip pre-dates connection-list support.
>> With multiple options conditionally depending on
- Original Message -
From: "Selva Nair"
To: "Gert Doering" ; "Debbie Tent"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] client config fallback from 1194
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi Folks
>
> sorry to chime in late (and unsolicited)
>
You are welcome.
>
> Am 21.10.2015 um 22:48 schrieb Gert Doering:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 04:37:57PM -0400, Selva Nair wrote:
> >> If I'm not
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 04:37:57PM -0400, Selva Nair wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, persist-remote-ip pre-dates connection-list support.
> With multiple options conditionally depending on each other, such seemingly
> unexpected behaviour is no surprise.. Call it feature or a bug. The user
>
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 5:39 PM, wrote:
> Results you could have SHARED in the FIRST place ..
>
Go through the thread carefully -- I was the first to point out the
conflict between persist-ip and multiple remotes. I tested this with 2.3.8
this morning seeing the OP's post,
openvpn server: OpenVPN 2.3.8 x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
openvpn client: Tunnelblick 3.6beta10 (build 4400)
config client:
remote 62.231.75.XX
port 80
proto tcp wait 1
remote 62.231.75.XX
port 1194
proto udp wait 10
client
dev tun
resolv-retry infinite
nobind
persist-key
persist-tun
10 matches
Mail list logo