----- Original Message ----- From: "Selva Nair" <selva.n...@gmail.com> To: "Gert Doering" <g...@greenie.muc.de>; "Debbie Tent" <debbie...@gmail.com> Cc: <openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 9:37 PM Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] client config fallback from 1194 udp to 80 tcp
> Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:10 PM, <debbie...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Gert Doering" <g...@greenie.muc.de> >> To: "Selva Nair" <selva.n...@gmail.com> >> >> > >> >> >> Why? Because of this line in the config: >> >> >> >> persist-remote-ip >> >> >> That will keep trying X:1194 only with whatever protocol is defined >> >> before >> >> those lines (or udp by default), if persist-remote-ip is also >> >> specified. >> >> This is an unfortunate side-effect of that option. >> >> > Ouch. >> >> > Could you re-test whether this is still true with git master, please? >> >> I think we may have a problem Houston: > > > If I'm not mistaken, persist-remote-ip pre-dates connection-list support. > With multiple options conditionally depending on each other, such > seemingly > unexpected behaviour is no surprise.. Call it feature or a bug. The user > asked for persist-remote-ip which the manual says will persist both IP and > port, so why expect something else. > Gert asked for a specific test, which I tested. I had no *expectations* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
