Hi,
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 06:28:02PM -0500, Ryan Whelan wrote:
Does the IPv6 implementation in OpenVPN track multicast memberships? Since
I'm using all IPv6, any IGMP snooping implementation wouldn't be of much
use. Does OpenVPN just broadcast all the ICMP multicast messages?
No, as Andy
From: Ryan Whelan [mailto:rcwhe...@gmail.com]
Sent: November-17-13 2:32 AM
To: Gert Doering
Cc: openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] IPv6 client-to-client communication
The reason I'd been using tap was because the multicast router (mrd6) didn't
seem to be working
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:44:36AM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 03:17:05PM -0500, Ryan Whelan wrote:
Would it be difficult to modify OpenVPN so it allocated a TAP/TUN
per client on connection, so each virtual interface was connected
to a single client?
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 09:30:51AM -0500, Ryan Whelan wrote:
Would it be possible to spawn multiple processes, one for each
client/tun/tap (with some configurable limit possibly)? It would also help
with multiprocessing! I have some machines with multiple processors which
are mostly a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18. nov. 2013 15:30, Ryan Whelan wrote:
Would it be possible to spawn multiple processes, one for each
client/tun/tap (with some configurable limit possibly)? It would
also help with multiprocessing! I have some machines with
multiple
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 02:31:33AM -0500, Ryan Whelan wrote:
The reason I'd been using tap was because the multicast router (mrd6)
didn't seem to be working with tun. (the clients will be sending multicast
traffic) I'm only slightly familiar with multicast and barely anymore
familiar
Would it be difficult to modify OpenVPN so it allocated a TAP/TUN per
client on connection, so each virtual interface was connected to a single
client? (removing it on client disconnect/drop) This is going to be a
shared environment and the ability to apply security to individual
interfaces via a
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 03:17:05PM -0500, Ryan Whelan wrote:
Would it be difficult to modify OpenVPN so it allocated a TAP/TUN per
client on connection, so each virtual interface was connected to a single
client? (removing it on client disconnect/drop)
Significantly so. The code
I have a (tap) server setup with `topology subnet` and an IPv6 pool
configured `server-ipv6 fdda:ba64:dcdc:1::1/64'
Clients can connect, get IPv6 addresses and ping the server on the address
it assigns its tap interface (fdda:ba64:dcdc:1::2). The clients can not
communicate with one another-
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:45:37PM -0500, Ryan Whelan wrote:
With 2 clients connected with the addresses fdda:ba64:dcdc:1::1002 and
fdda:ba64:dcdc:1::1001, when trying to ping from one to the other, I can
see the NDP traffic on the server's tap interface-
03:55:01.978033 IP6
The reason I'd been using tap was because the multicast router (mrd6)
didn't seem to be working with tun. (the clients will be sending multicast
traffic) I'm only slightly familiar with multicast and barely anymore
familiar with IPv6; is there a better method to handle multicast traffic
from the
11 matches
Mail list logo
