Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 2.6 kernel crash on Asus WL500gP_V2

2010-03-01 Thread Kövesdi György
Compile a kernel with debugging enabled, this is pretty much worthless There are a lot of options under debugging in the config. I enabled all of them, but the result hangs during boot. Which one must be enabled? Thx K. Gy. ___ openwrt-devel mailing

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 2.6 kernel crash on Asus WL500gP_V2

2010-03-01 Thread mail
On Mon, March 1, 2010 09:01, K�vesdi Gy�rgy wrote: Compile a kernel with debugging enabled, this is pretty much worthless There are a lot of options under debugging in the config. I enabled all of them, but the result hangs during boot. Which one must be enabled? Most important is Compile the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt-Tickets] [OpenWrt] #6484: generic 2.6.33 preliminary support

2010-03-01 Thread HongPeng Tian
OpenWrt 写道: #6484: generic 2.6.33 preliminary support -+-- Reporter: acoul alex at ozo.com | Owner: developers Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: normal |

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] dropbear: allow multiple listen ports to be configured

2010-03-01 Thread Bas Mevissen
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 11:30 +0100, Stijn Tintel wrote: On 28-02-10 11:28, Stijn Tintel wrote: This patch allows multiple listen ports to be configured for dropbear in /etc/config/dropbear. It renames the 'Port' option to 'Ports', so this will break existing configs. What looks more useful

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [patch] firewall feature

2010-03-01 Thread Nico
Just to be clear, it's not intended to be a selectable feature, it will just be defined if CONFIG_NETFILTER is defined in the target kernel config, like it is for the GPIO, PCI or USB features. What do you mean by migrate to the DEVICE_TYPE ? -- -{Nico} Imre Kaloz wrote: On Mon, 01 Mar 2010

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] dropbear: allow multiple listen ports to be configured

2010-03-01 Thread mail
On Mon, March 1, 2010 10:31, Bas Mevissen wrote: On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 11:30 +0100, Stijn Tintel wrote: On 28-02-10 11:28, Stijn Tintel wrote: This patch allows multiple listen ports to be configured for dropbear in /etc/config/dropbear. It renames the 'Port' option to 'Ports', so this

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] dropbear: allow multiple listen ports to be configured

2010-03-01 Thread Stijn Tintel
On 01-03-10 14:12, m...@maddes.net wrote: On Mon, March 1, 2010 10:31, Bas Mevissen wrote: On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 11:30 +0100, Stijn Tintel wrote: On 28-02-10 11:28, Stijn Tintel wrote: This patch allows multiple listen ports to be configured for dropbear in

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] add sslh package to release packages

2010-03-01 Thread Travis Kemen
sslh will not be added to the 8.09 packages branch. I will make it into the next release. Travis On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Matthias Buecher / Germany m...@maddes.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi OpenWrt team, please add packages/net/sslh to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] dropbear: allow multiple listen ports to be configured

2010-03-01 Thread Bas Mevissen
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:22 +0100, Stijn Tintel wrote: Since the above suggestion is OK for me, I'd suggest to just forget this patch :-) The patch itself is useful if someone wants to explore the possibilities of dropbear. There is a difference between two instances and one instance which

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [patch] firewall feature

2010-03-01 Thread Imre Kaloz
On 2010.03.01. 12:34:03 Nico n...@openwrt.org wrote: Just to be clear, it's not intended to be a selectable feature, it will just be defined if CONFIG_NETFILTER is defined in the target kernel config, like it is for the GPIO, PCI or USB features. What do you mean by migrate to the DEVICE_TYPE

[OpenWrt-Devel] openssl 0.9.8m update

2010-03-01 Thread Peter Wagner
patch attached greets Peter Wagner diff --git a/package/openssl/Makefile b/package/openssl/Makefile index 2d2a940..3b99c08 100644 --- a/package/openssl/Makefile +++ b/package/openssl/Makefile @@ -8,15 +8,15 @@ include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk PKG_NAME:=openssl -PKG_VERSION:=0.9.8l -PKG_RELEASE:=2

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/0] enable 802.11w support

2010-03-01 Thread Stijn Tintel
This patch series enables management frame protection (802.11w) in hostapd and wpa_supplicant. Both programs implement IEEE Std 802.11w-2009 since version 0.7.0 (1),(2). According to (3), the only driver that currently supports 802.11w is ath9k. I have tested this on two identical OpenWrt

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 4/4] hostapd: make 802.11w related options configurable

2010-03-01 Thread Stijn Tintel
When enabling MFP, hostapd will read assoc_sa_query_max_timeout and assoc_sa_query_retry_timeout from it's config file. Make these options configurable in /etc/config/wireless. To make it clear that these options are 802.11w related, I named them ieee80211w_max_timeout and ieee80211w_retry_timeout

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/4] wpa_supplicant: enable 802.11w

2010-03-01 Thread Stijn Tintel
Enable management frame protection in wpa_supplicant, and make it configurable in /etc/config/wireless. Signed-off-by: Stijn Tintel st...@linux-ipv6.be --- package/hostapd/files/wpa_supplicant-full.config |2 +- package/hostapd/files/wpa_supplicant.sh | 10 ++ 2 files

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/4] hostapd: enable 802.11w

2010-03-01 Thread Stijn Tintel
Enable management frame protection in hostapd, and make it configurable in /etc/config/wireless. Since ath9k is currently the only driver that supports MFP, it will only be enabled when ath9k is enabled. Signed-off-by: Stijn Tintel st...@linux-ipv6.be --- package/hostapd/Makefile |3

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] TP-Link TL-WR741ND: broadcasts on ethernet not reaching CPU

2010-03-01 Thread Dennis Bartsch
Hello From: j...@gmx.de I couldn't find any code in svn r19920 dealing specifically with the AR7240 and the built-in switch. Today in revision 19927 switch support for AG7240 has been committed. I'll try that. Buildroot is running at the moment. So I guess that the bootloader

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] usb driver for openrb board

2010-03-01 Thread Bernhard Loos
Well, you could always look at some packages for exisiting kernel modules for blueprints. If you have some specific questions, you can ask them here or in #openwrt on freenode. But please try to figure out how to do this by yourself first, too general questions will only get general and not very

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] AR7240 switch // was: TP-Link TL-WR741ND: broadcasts on ethernet not reaching CPU

2010-03-01 Thread Dennis Bartsch
Hello list, finally the switch in the TP-Link TL-WR741N(D) (and probably other devices based von AR7140) is not blocking broadcasts any more and thus allows to get an IP via DHCP. But my question is left to be answered. Does this bridge which is created over the LAN-ports really mean that

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Redboot job, supporting a mini router

2010-03-01 Thread Bernhard Loos
Did you try to flash an ar71xx image? For example the fon one? If the kernel at least starts to boot, I can do the rest. Otherwise, I'm not so sure. Bernhard 2010/3/1 jason duhamell ps2chi...@gmail.com: Ok, I decided I will start the Job offer at 100 dollars and the board. dont worry

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [patch] firewall feature

2010-03-01 Thread Imre Kaloz
On 2010.03.02. 04:52:23 Nico n...@openwrt.org wrote: Well, using DEVICE_TYPE does not solve the issue, it will just prevent netfilter modules from being embedded in the final images, but wont prevent them from being built and that will just fail for those targets that have CONFIG_NETFILTER not

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [patch] firewall feature

2010-03-01 Thread mail
On Tue, March 2, 2010 07:10, Imre Kaloz wrote: On 2010.03.02. 04:52:23 Nico n...@openwrt.org wrote: Well, using DEVICE_TYPE does not solve the issue, it will just prevent netfilter modules from being embedded in the final images, but wont prevent them from being built and that will just fail