Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

2011-09-05 Thread Florian Fainelli
On Sunday 04 September 2011 22:44:08 Luka Perkov wrote: On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 08:47:46PM +0200, Michael Büsch wrote: On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 01:06:02 +0200 Luka Perkov open...@lukaperkov.net wrote: What are you actually trying to fix with enabling preemption? I didn't really get it by

[OpenWrt-Devel] How to enable inter access points communication?

2011-09-05 Thread 马进
Hi all, I am using wzr-hp-g300nh right now. The firmware is openwrt. How to setup the inter AP communication? I want to let one AP know the existence of another AP which is in the range of network contention. Do you have any ideas about it? Thank you. Regards.

[OpenWrt-Devel] How to enable inter access points communicat#8203; ion?

2011-09-05 Thread MaJin
Hi all, I am using wzr-hp-g300nh right now. The firmware is openwrt. How to setup the inter AP communication? I want to let one AP know the existence of another AP which is in the range of network contention. Do you have any ideas about it? Thank you. Regards

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

2011-09-05 Thread Michael Büsch
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:58:58 +0200 Florian Fainelli flor...@openwrt.org wrote: Now this looks better, I am not opposed at all in us exposing such a kernel configuration option to users through OpenWrt's menuconfig. I'm completely fine with this as long as it defaults to no-preempt and that it

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

2011-09-05 Thread Michael Büsch
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:44:08 +0200 Luka Perkov open...@lukaperkov.net wrote: Unhandled kernel unaligned access[#1]: Cpu 0 $ 0 : 0006 0011 $ 4 : d5bf9da3 80dbb548 0006 c010 $ 8 : c578 6e617332 6e617332 $12 :

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

2011-09-05 Thread Conor O'Gorman
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 13:25 +, Michael Büsch wrote: On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:44:08 +0200 Luka Perkov open...@lukaperkov.net wrote: Unhandled kernel unaligned access[#1]: Cpu 0 $ 0 : 0006 0011 $ 4 : d5bf9da3 80dbb548 0006 c010 $ 8 : c578

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How to enable inter access points communication?

2011-09-05 Thread Conor O'Gorman
It would appear to be an Atheros device -http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/buffalo/wzr-hp-g300h I would suggest starting here - http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/recipes/atheroswds On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 21:57 +0900, 马进 wrote: Hi all, I am using wzr-hp-g300nh right now. The firmware is openwrt. How to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

2011-09-05 Thread Conor O'Gorman
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 13:25 +, Michael Büsch wrote: On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:44:08 +0200 Luka Perkov open...@lukaperkov.net wrote: Unhandled kernel unaligned access[#1]: Cpu 0 $ 0 : 0006 0011 $ 4 : d5bf9da3 80dbb548 0006 c010 $ 8 : c578

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] picostation m2hp help!

2011-09-05 Thread Damien Courtaillier
Gioacchino Mazzurco gmazzurco89 at gmail.com writes: p.s. the working image is the one for bullet ;) 2010/12/24 Gioacchino Mazzurco gmazzurco89 at gmail.com It seems is a problem of target!Using Ubiquity product as target images miss everything about wireless also iwUsing Default ( alla

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

2011-09-05 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2011-09-05 3:25 PM, Michael Büsch wrote: On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:44:08 +0200 Luka Perkovopen...@lukaperkov.net wrote: Unhandled kernel unaligned access[#1]: Cpu 0 $ 0 : 0006 0011 $ 4 : d5bf9da3 80dbb548 0006 c010 $ 8 : c578 6e617332

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

2011-09-05 Thread Luka Perkov
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:58:58AM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: On Sunday 04 September 2011 22:44:08 Luka Perkov wrote: On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 08:47:46PM +0200, Michael Büsch wrote: If you want to debug say so and I'll send you vmlinux file. I'm not going to debug this further. Then

[OpenWrt-Devel] DIR-615 E4: ledtrig-netdev vs. AR7240 switch

2011-09-05 Thread Alexey Loukianov
Good day to all, For last two days I've been trying to build the replacement for my old-good DIR-320 home router running OpenWRT. Due to a number of reasons I don't want to dive into I ended up with buying DIR-615 rev. E4 router and trying to get working under OpenWRT. Current OpenWRT trunk

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] upgrade uboot-envtools

2011-09-05 Thread Luka Perkov
Upgrade uboot-envtools to the newest version, add example config file and refresh patches. Signed-off-by: Luka Perkov openwrt --to-- lukaperkov.net --- Index: package/uboot-envtools/patches/001-crc32_func_signature.patch === ---

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] DIR-615 E4: ledtrig-netdev vs. AR7240 switch

2011-09-05 Thread Alexey Loukianov
06.09.2011 01:31, Alexey Loukianov wrote: Now I want WAN and LAN1-4 leds to be lit when active link detected on appropriate port and to blink on tx/rx. It's easy to achive for wan port with help of ledtrig-netdev as this port is connected to a dedicated CPU ethernet interface (eth1 in my

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2] Fix fcgi++ build, and put it in a separate package

2011-09-05 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, The intent of these 2 patches is to get Wt running on openwrt. (It's a c++ web framework). It worked out really well for the application I wrote, although it requires a bit of space when built as shared libraries. (Of course, static builds and aggressive linking can reduce the size for a

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/2] New package: wt (C++ web toolkit: http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt )

2011-09-05 Thread Wade Berrier
Second patch in getting Wt working on openwrt. --- libs/wt/Makefile | 164 ++ 1 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 libs/wt/Makefile diff --git a/libs/wt/Makefile b/libs/wt/Makefile new file mode 100644 index

[OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC] Boot/Preinit/Init Requirements (for the init/preinit that will be coming)

2011-09-05 Thread Daniel Dickinson
Hi all, I've been working on the requirements specification for boot/preinit/init to try to illuminate what preinit/init has to be able to do to be feature complete compared to the current version, plus the new features we want to have. I was originally looking for a way to reduce what preinit

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] picostation m2hp help!

2011-09-05 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
sorry there was a typo in the email: target system - Atheros ar71xx target profile - Default ( all drivers ) you should use the image for bullet not the one for nanostation 2011/9/5 Damien Courtaillier damien.courtaill...@weblib.eu: Gioacchino Mazzurco gmazzurco89 at gmail.com writes: