-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I merged your branches into my openwrt, packages and luci repos and gave it a
try over the past 24 hours running on a ath9k-based router.
Results: very nice. This should go uptream.
On 27/04/12 15:39, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at
On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 14:48 -0700, Dave Täht wrote:
+
+-#define tcp_flag_word(tp) ( ((union tcp_word_hdr *)(tp))-words [3])
++#define tcp_flag_word2(tp) ( ((union tcp_word_hdr *)(tp))-words [3])
++#define tcp_flag_word(tp) ( __get_unaligned_cpu32union tcp_word_hdr
*)(tp))-words
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:49 AM, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote:
On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 14:48 -0700, Dave Täht wrote:
Thank you very much for the code review!
+
+-#define tcp_flag_word(tp) ( ((union tcp_word_hdr *)(tp))-words [3])
++#define tcp_flag_word2(tp) ( ((union
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 07:41 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
Tell it to however wired up this chip and shipped it in qty millions.
Actually that message was already received, successor chipsets from
this manufacturer did it up right.
So the real problem is that the ar71xx doesn't allow you to DMA to
On 2012-04-30 4:49 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 07:41 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
Tell it to however wired up this chip and shipped it in qty millions.
Actually that message was already received, successor chipsets from
this manufacturer did it up right.
So the real problem
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:49 AM, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 07:41 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
Tell it to however wired up this chip and shipped it in qty millions.
Actually that message was already received, successor chipsets from
this manufacturer did it up
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2012-04-30 4:49 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 07:41 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
Tell it to however wired up this chip and shipped it in qty millions.
Actually that message was already received, successor
On 2012-04-30 5:08 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2012-04-30 4:49 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 07:41 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
Tell it to however wired up this chip and shipped it in qty millions.
Actually that
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2012-04-30 5:08 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2012-04-30 4:49 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 07:41 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
Tell it to
On 2012-04-30 8:11 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2012-04-30 5:08 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2012-04-30 4:49 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 11:11 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2012-04-30 5:08 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2012-04-30 4:49 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon,
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 20:34 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
There could be a generic Kconfig variable which could be selected by CPU
targets or ethernet drivers (with a dependency on
!HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS).
That's cleaner than messing around with #define stuff manually.
Don't just
On 04/30/2012 06:48 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 20:34 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
There could be a generic Kconfig variable which could be selected by CPU
targets or ethernet drivers (with a dependency on
!HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS).
That's cleaner than messing
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 19:16 +, Karl P wrote:
As a user, I _never_ want to have to go and turn on the switch that says,
make
my device work as fast as it can
Is there any reason that I would _not_ want this?
You may only have a printer, or something like that, attached to the
crappy
14 matches
Mail list logo
