Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Second RGMII ethernet on MT7621?

2018-04-30 Thread Roman Yeryomin
On 2018-04-30 22:10, John Crispin wrote: On 30/04/18 19:08, Bjørn Mork wrote: Hello, I have been playing with a ZyXEL WAP6805, which appears to be an OEM version of the https://wikidevi.com/wiki/ZyXEL_WAP6806_(Armor_X1) This thing has an oversized mini-PCIe Quantenna module. Or that's the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Second RGMII ethernet on MT7621?

2018-04-30 Thread John Crispin
On 30/04/18 19:08, Bjørn Mork wrote: Hello, I have been playing with a ZyXEL WAP6805, which appears to be an OEM version of the https://wikidevi.com/wiki/ZyXEL_WAP6806_(Armor_X1) This thing has an oversized mini-PCIe Quantenna module. Or that's the mechanical form factor. The connection

[OpenWrt-Devel] Second RGMII ethernet on MT7621?

2018-04-30 Thread Bjørn Mork
Hello, I have been playing with a ZyXEL WAP6805, which appears to be an OEM version of the https://wikidevi.com/wiki/ZyXEL_WAP6806_(Armor_X1) This thing has an oversized mini-PCIe Quantenna module. Or that's the mechanical form factor. The connection between the MT7621 and the Quantenna

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Setting *wireless* MTU, "UCI-compliant" way?

2018-04-30 Thread Daniel Golle
Hi Jeff, On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 08:59:12AM -0700, Jeff Kletsky wrote: > TL;DR > > When wireless is used as transport for an encapsulated stream, it can be > beneficial (or essential) to increase the MTU of the link closer to the 2304 > 802.11 MTU. I haven't found a way to set the MTU of the

[OpenWrt-Devel] Setting *wireless* MTU, "UCI-compliant" way?

2018-04-30 Thread Jeff Kletsky
TL;DR When wireless is used as transport for an encapsulated stream, it can be beneficial (or essential) to increase the MTU of the link closer to the 2304 802.11 MTU. I haven't found a way to set the MTU of the wireless device itself through UCI. If there's something I'm missing, I'd

[OpenWrt-Devel] Possible extensions to uci cli

2018-04-30 Thread Sergii Kalchuk
Hi all, let's consider the scenario of transferring configuration from one device to another. With uci cli, options can be nicely transferred by using something similar to value="$( uci get option_src)" ; uci set option_target="$value" For lists, it's however not that elegant anymore. For the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 0/4] Gemini forward-port to kernel v4.14

2018-04-30 Thread John Crispin
On 29/04/18 20:32, Roman Yeryomin wrote: On 2018-04-27 09:18, John Crispin wrote: On 17/04/18 00:34, Roman Yeryomin wrote: On 2018-04-15 20:22, Roman Yeryomin wrote: On 2018-04-14 20:36, Hans Ulli Kroll wrote: Hi Roman On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Linus Walleij wrote: On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at