Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] kernel-build: fix kernel_menuconfig breakage by forcing YACC

2019-11-11 Thread Petr Štetiar
Thomas Albers [2019-11-12 00:02:37]: Hi, > Since the purpose of the previous patch is to use host pkg-config > instead of toolchain pkg-config, wouldn't the more correct be to also > use host bison? as you can see, relying on anything from the host is very fragile, but in this limited

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] kernel-build: fix kernel_menuconfig breakage by forcing YACC

2019-11-11 Thread Thomas Albers via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hello! Since the purpose of the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: add support for COMFAST CF-E130N v2

2019-11-11 Thread Enrico Mioso
SPI frequency? > Il giorno 11 nov 2019, alle ore 23:02, Kryma ha scritto: > > Hi, > >> That's wrong. You have 0x7d, not 0xfd ... > > There seems to be some discrepancy, possibly v1 vs v2. The specifications on > the website and the partitioning seem to imply a 8MB image size -

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: add support for COMFAST CF-E130N v2

2019-11-11 Thread Kryma
Hi, That's wrong. You have 0x7d, not 0xfd ... There seems to be some discrepancy, possibly v1 vs v2. The specifications on the website and the partitioning seem to imply a 8MB image size - however, U-boot bootloader and the sum of MTD block sizes gives us 16MB. Unsure, I tried both

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: add support for COMFAST CF-E130N v2

2019-11-11 Thread Roger Pueyo Centelles | Guifi.net
Hi, In addition to Adrian's comments, could it be that the device was a 802.11bgn router? www.comfast.com.cn/index.php?m=content=index=show=19=23 Cheers, Roger El 11/11/19 a les 10:09, Adrian Schmutzler ha escrit: > Hi, > >> +aliases { >> +serial0 = >> +led-boot =

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: remove obsolete OF_PCI config symbols

2019-11-11 Thread Petr Štetiar
Those symbols were removed in kernel 4.16: commit 4670d610d59233b017a6ea1fa25bbf06dabbff42 Author: Rob Herring PCI: Move OF-related PCI functions into PCI core Fixes: FS#2588 Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar --- target/linux/ath79/config-4.19 | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 maintainer-tools] patchwork-apply.sh: try to fix DMARC mangled patches

2019-11-11 Thread Etienne Champetier
Hi Petr, "mailing list admins", Le dim. 10 nov. 2019 à 10:05, Petr Štetiar a écrit : > > In order to avoid DMARC plague in the commit messages: I saw this some days ago: http://arc-spec.org/ Haven't had time to look at it, but it's supposed to be a solution to the DMARC + mailing list mess

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] kernel-build: fix kernel_menuconfig breakage by forcing YACC

2019-11-11 Thread Petr Štetiar
Commit 965f341aa9fd ("build: fix host menu config targets using ncurses") has moved host's path with pkg-config (usually /usr/bin) at the first place in PATH variable, which is now causing issues with bison as BISON_PKGDATADIR points into STAGING_DIR_HOST, but the actual bison used is the one

[OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC] build-system: NAND: Concerns around bad-block reservation and kernel / image size

2019-11-11 Thread Jeff Kletsky
TL;DR   NAND-resident kernels seem likely to have bad blocks in the partition.   `KERNEL_SIZE := 2048k` seems likely to overflow a 2 MB partition   that has even a single bad block   The ath79-nand kernel is already over 1,900,000 bytes   What should the bad-block reservation be for a 2-MB

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] wlan factory defaults

2019-11-11 Thread Baptiste Jonglez
Hi, On 11-11-19, Piotr Dymacz wrote: > On 11.11.2019 20:33, Ivan Baktsheev wrote: > > How to put this configuration into device? This is not a question for > > OpenWrt developers, but for people, who build customized OpenWrt firmware. > > It’s definitely better to customise build using

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] wlan factory defaults

2019-11-11 Thread Piotr Dymacz
Hi Ivan, On 11.11.2019 20:33, Ivan Baktsheev wrote: Piotr, On 11 Nov 2019, at 21:35, Piotr Dymacz wrote: Hi Ivan, On 11.11.2019 19:09, Ivan Baktsheev wrote: Hi, I want to add new device, but as of now I can upload firmware wirelessly and then I need to connect using wired connection,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] wlan factory defaults

2019-11-11 Thread Ivan Baktsheev
Piotr, > On 11 Nov 2019, at 21:35, Piotr Dymacz wrote: > > Hi Ivan, > > On 11.11.2019 19:09, Ivan Baktsheev wrote: >> Hi, >> I want to add new device, but as of now I can upload firmware wirelessly and >> then I need to connect using wired connection, because in stock OpenWrt >> image

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] rpcd: add respawn param

2019-11-11 Thread Michael Jones
On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 6:53 AM Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 11/7/19 2:31 PM, Florian Eckert wrote: > > The rpcd service is an important service, but if the service stops > > working for any reason, no one will ever respawn that service. With this > > commit, the procd service will monitor if the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] wlan factory defaults

2019-11-11 Thread Piotr Dymacz
Hi Ivan, On 11.11.2019 19:09, Ivan Baktsheev wrote: Hi, I want to add new device, but as of now I can upload firmware wirelessly and then I need to connect using wired connection, because in stock OpenWrt image wireless is disabled. For my router (and probably many others) default WiFi SSID

[OpenWrt-Devel] Congratulations on 19.07-rc1

2019-11-11 Thread Rich Brown
I saw an notice for an update to the OpenWrt wiki: Announcement for 19.07-rc1: https://openwrt.org/releases/start Release Notes: https://openwrt.org/releases/19.07/notes-19.07.0-rc1 Thanks to all who helped to move us off top-dead-center. Rich ___

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] wlan factory defaults

2019-11-11 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On > Behalf Of Ivan Baktsheev > Sent: Montag, 11. November 2019 19:10 > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] wlan factory defaults > > Hi, > > I want to add new

[OpenWrt-Devel] wlan factory defaults

2019-11-11 Thread Ivan Baktsheev
Hi, I want to add new device, but as of now I can upload firmware wirelessly and then I need to connect using wired connection, because in stock OpenWrt image wireless is disabled. For my router (and probably many others) default WiFi SSID stored in factory partition and it’s quite easy to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: add support for COMFAST CF-E130N v2

2019-11-11 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
Hi, > + aliases { > + serial0 = > + led-boot = > + led-failsafe = > + led-upgrade = Please don't use LAN here, as it will be ambiguous. For TP-Link CPE devices, we relied on rssi_high for this task, so either use this one or choose

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: add support for COMFAST CF-E130N v2

2019-11-11 Thread admin
From: Pavel Balan This patch adds support for the COMFAST CF-E130N v2, an outdoor wireless CPE with a single Ethernet port and a 802.11an radio. Specifications: - QCA9531 SoC - 1x 10/100 Mbps Ethernet, both with PoE-in support - 64 MB of RAM (DDR2) - 16 MB of FLASH - 5 dBi built-in

[OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC/RFT PATCH] mediatek: split base-files into subtargets

2019-11-11 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
This splits some base-files across subtargets, as done previously on ath79 and ramips and also introduced for mt7629 subtarget here already. While at it, apply the following fixes: - Remove lots of trailing whitespaces - Remove wildcard on unielec,u7623-02-emmc-512m - Remove inconsistent

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2] ath79: add D-Link DIR-615 E4

2019-11-11 Thread Paul Fertser
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 01:53:10PM +0100, Adrian Schmutzler wrote: > > I've made specific effort to flash vendor firmware and confirmed by > > testing on hardware that the vendor firmware doesn't need those > > partitions. Isn't that enough? What important aspects did I not check? > > I haven't

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2] ath79: add D-Link DIR-615 E4

2019-11-11 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
Hi, > > > + label = "dir-615-e4:green:power"; > > > > Sorry for causing confusion here. I have had a look into ar71xx mach > > files and they consistent use "d-link" as vendor for the led > > labels. Thus, I think it makes more sense to revert that to the > > previous version

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/2] openssh: update to 8.1p1

2019-11-11 Thread Kyle Copperfield via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Signed-off-by: Kyle Copperfield

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2] openssh: add openwrt failsafe support

2019-11-11 Thread Kyle Copperfield via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Adds failsafe support to the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2] ath79: add D-Link DIR-615 E4

2019-11-11 Thread Paul Fertser
Hello Adrian, Thank you very much for the review. On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 12:12:47PM +0100, Adrian Schmutzler wrote: > > + power_green: power_green { > > As stated above, change the _label_ to include a "led_" prefix, so > this becomes "led_power_green: power_green {". Same for

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2] ath79: add D-Link DIR-615 E4

2019-11-11 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
Hi again, > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On > Behalf Of Paul Fertser > Sent: Samstag, 9. November 2019 14:53 > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Cc: Paul Fertser ; Adrian Schmutzler > ; tm...@gmx.de > Subject:

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2] ath79: add D-Link DIR-615 E4

2019-11-11 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
Hi, > > > +           label = "dir-615-e4:green:power"; > > > > Sorry for causing confusion here. I have had a look into ar71xx > > mach files and they consistent use "d-link" as vendor for the > > led labels. Thus, I think it makes more sense to revert that to > > the previous

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2] base-files: indicate initial setup by uci system config option

2019-11-11 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
Hi Karl, > Adrian Schmutzler wrote: > > This provides a uci system config setting that will be set only > > during initial setup. This can be used by uci-defaults script > > to determine whether they are run during initial setup or after > > a sysupgrade. > Given that it will be set again

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2] ath79: add D-Link DIR-615 E4

2019-11-11 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
Hi Paul, [...] > + aliases { > + led-boot = _amber; Please include "led_" prefix for the labels, so _power_amber in this case. > + led-failsafe = _amber; > + led-running = _green; > + led-upgrade = _amber; > + }; > + [...] > + leds