Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Issue connecting with Quectel EM20-G modem on openwrt

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- FWIW, I’m able to use this modem

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] build: always use -minterlink-mips16 if USE_MIPS16

Individual packages may turn off MIPS16 ISA individually with PKG_USE_MIPS16. However, they may link to a library compiled with MIPS16. In such cases, the -minterlink-mips16 is needed to ensure there are no direct jumps to code compiled with a different ISA. Instead of adding -minterlink-mips16

[OpenWrt-Devel] [sdwalker/sdwalker.github.io] a33bb0: This week's update

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/sdwalker/sdwalker.github.io Commit: a33bb0d72905082885c013e87c28e8bcbde808d5 https://github.com/sdwalker/sdwalker.github.io/commit/a33bb0d72905082885c013e87c28e8bcbde808d5 Author: Stephen Walker Date: 2020-05-24 (Sun, 24 May

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v4] ramips: add support for TRENDnet TEW-810DR

Hi, > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Heppler, J. Scott > Sent: Donnerstag, 7. Mai 2020 18:03 > To: openwrt-de...@openwrt.org > Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v4] ramips: add support for TRENDnet > TEW-810DR > >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Fix for missing kernel stack-protector in x86_64 glibc builds

Hauke, patch in git format attached Regarding uclibc, the only references I could find spoke about a SSP patch that was committed and then reverted. I'd have to browse the source to be sure whether it supports it or not. To note about this change: there is another symbol in

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] procd fails to start /sbin/netifd randomly (libubox regression)

On 23.05.2020 12:22, Rafał Miłecki wrote: On 22.05.2020 11:28, Rafał Miłecki wrote: Failed restart: Fri May 22 09:22:05 2020 daemon.err procd: [instance_fill_array] blobmsg_type(cur): 2 (BLOBMSG_TYPE_TABLE) Fri May 22 09:22:05 2020 daemon.err procd: [instance_fill_array] BEFORE 75e300aeec25:

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Experimental "release goals" for 19.07.4

On 23-05-20, Michael Jones wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2020, 13:01 Baptiste Jonglez > wrote: > > > If the initial concept looks good, we can think about automating some of > > it: > > tag bug reports on Flyspray/Github/Gitlab as blocking for a specific > > release, use "milestones", automatically

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v3] ath79/nand: add support for Netgear WNDR4300SW

Hi, > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Stijn Segers > Sent: Samstag, 23. Mai 2020 10:50 > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v3] ath79/nand: add support for Netgear > WNDR4300SW > >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] bcm63xx: DGND3700v1: device tree improvements

Hi Adrian El dom., 24 may. 2020 a las 13:15, escribió: > > Hi Daniel, > > > -Original Message- > > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > > On Behalf Of Daniel González Cabanelas > > Sent: Sonntag, 24. Mai 2020 11:06 > > To: m...@adrianschmutzler.de > >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Fix for missing kernel stack-protector in x86_64 glibc builds

On 5/24/20 2:04 PM, Ian Cooper wrote: > Patch attached as my email client seems to have mangled it a bit when > inserted inline > > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On > Behalf Of Ian Cooper > Sent: 24 May 2020 12:35 > To:

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Experimental "release goals" for 19.07.4

On 23.05.20 21:34, Michael Jones wrote: > > > On Sat, May 23, 2020, 13:01 Baptiste Jonglez > wrote:  > > If the initial concept looks good, we can think about automating some of > it: > tag bug reports on Flyspray/Github/Gitlab as blocking for a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Fix for missing kernel stack-protector in x86_64 glibc builds

Patch attached as my email client seems to have mangled it a bit when inserted inline -Original Message- From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On Behalf Of Ian Cooper Sent: 24 May 2020 12:35 To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] Fix

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v6] ath79: add support for COMFAST CF-E130N v2

Hi, > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of ad...@kryma.net > Sent: Freitag, 27. März 2020 04:33 > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Cc: Pavel Balan > Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v6] ath79: add support for COMFAST

[OpenWrt-Devel] Fix for missing kernel stack-protector in x86_64 glibc builds

Hi all, Forgive such a long post on my first posting to this list. I have a change to propose that, while trivial in the actual patch to the build system, affects the toolchain, kernel and every package, so I don't want to just create a PR for it without some discussion and agreement

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] bcm63xx: DGND3700v1: device tree improvements

Hi Daniel, > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Daniel González Cabanelas > Sent: Sonntag, 24. Mai 2020 11:06 > To: m...@adrianschmutzler.de > Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Álvaro Fernández Rojas > > Subject:

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] bcm63xx: DGND3700v1: device tree improvements

Hi Adrian: El dom., 24 may. 2020 a las 1:01, escribió: > > Hi, > > > -Original Message- > > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > > On Behalf Of Daniel González Cabanelas > > Sent: Sonntag, 24. Mai 2020 00:24 > > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > >

[OpenWrt-Devel] ath79: add support for COMFAST CF-E130N v2

Hi Pavel, What about you patch ? It will be great to add COMFAST CF-E130N v2 to openwrt master. Do you need help ? Best regards Yaroslav Petrov ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org