Re: Brokenness of the OpenWrt "packages" repo

2021-04-26 Thread Eric Luehrsen
On 4/26/21 3:58 PM, Alberto Bursi wrote: On 26/04/21 16:01, Daniel Golle wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 03:28:22PM +0200, Enrico Mioso wrote: ... I know you won't like this. But in the end, I guess D-Bus, glib2 and in the end all of MM dependencies will have to be incorporated in the core.

OpenWrt 21.02.0 first release candidate

2021-04-26 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
Hi, The OpenWrt community is proud to announce the first release candidate of the upcoming OpenWrt 21.02 stable version series. It incorporates over 5800 commits since branching the previous OpenWrt 19.07 release and has been under development for about one and a half year. WPA3 support

RE: [PATCH] ramips: add support for Wavlink WL-WN578A2

2021-04-26 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Aldrian [mailto:dev.aldr...@gmail.com] > Sent: Montag, 26. April 2021 20:41 > To: Adrian Schmutzler ; openwrt- > de...@lists.openwrt.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ramips: add support for Wavlink WL-WN578A2 > > On Sun, 2021-04-25 at 22:27 +0200, Adrian

Re: Brokenness of the OpenWrt "packages" repo

2021-04-26 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 26/04/21 16:01, Daniel Golle wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 03:28:22PM +0200, Enrico Mioso wrote: ... I know you won't like this. But in the end, I guess D-Bus, glib2 and in the end all of MM dependencies will have to be incorporated in the core. A stac, of big big software, I know. But

Re: Brokenness of the OpenWrt "packages" repo

2021-04-26 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 26/04/21 07:51, Bjørn Mork wrote: Etienne Champetier writes: Are you trying at the same time to complain about not run-tested updates and possibly having packages not up to date ? No. The package was fine before the version was changed. In fact, it was in much better shape before it

Re: Brokenness of the OpenWrt "packages" repo (was: Re: [PATCH] Revert "dbus: update to 1.13.18")

2021-04-26 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 25/04/21 15:51, Bjørn Mork wrote: Rosen Penev writes: Why was this sent here? dbus is in the packages feed. Sorry, I assumed that was obvious. I'll explain There is a continous push to move packages from the OpenWrt core repo to the "packages" repo. This would have been fine if both

Re: [PATCH] ramips: add support for Wavlink WL-WN578A2

2021-04-26 Thread Thomas Aldrian
On Sun, 2021-04-25 at 22:27 +0200, Adrian Schmutzler wrote: > Why wlan1? Is this chosen arbitrarily (than please drop the default > setup), or is the vendor really also using only one specific radio > for the RSSI leds? > > Best > > Adrian Hi Adrian, The stock firmware does use some sort of

[PATCH v3 2/2] sdk: unset BINARY_FOLDER and DOWNLOAD_FOLDER in final archives

2021-04-26 Thread Sven Roederer
Using these config-options to customize the folders used at build-time makes these folder settings appear in generated archive. This causes the SDK to be not portable, as it's going to use the build-time folders on the new systems. The errors vary from passing the build, disk out-of-space to

[PATCH v3 0/2] imagebuilder, sdk: unset BINARY_FOLDER and DOWNLOAD_FOLDER in final archives

2021-04-26 Thread Sven Roederer
Using the BINARY_FOLDER or DOWNLOAD_FOLDER options make them escape from the build-system to the system the archives run later. As the build-time path will usually not work on the other system, restore the intree defaults. ___ openwrt-devel mailing

[PATCH v3 1/2] imagebuilder: unset BINARY_FOLDER and DOWNLOAD_FOLDER in final archive

2021-04-26 Thread Sven Roederer
Using these config-options to customize the folders used at build-time makes these folder settings appear in generated archive. This causes the imagebuilder to be not portable, as it's going to use the build-time folders on the new systems. Errors look like: mkdir: cannot create directory

Re: Brokenness of the OpenWrt "packages" repo

2021-04-26 Thread Bjørn Mork
Daniel Golle writes: > Depending on half of the Freedesktop universe in order to initialize > a network interface or receive an SMS in a very complicated way doesn't > feel justified to me. I have been very pleased with uqmi and umbim as alternatives for tiny embedded devices, and I am hoping

Re: Brokenness of the OpenWrt "packages" repo

2021-04-26 Thread Daniel Golle
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 03:28:22PM +0200, Enrico Mioso wrote: > ... I know you won't like this. But in the end, I guess D-Bus, glib2 and in > the end all of MM dependencies will have to be incorporated in the core. > > A stac, of big big software, I know. But supporting 4G/5G in the end will >

Re: Brokenness of the OpenWrt "packages" repo

2021-04-26 Thread Enrico Mioso
Sorry ... I don't mean to undervalue the efforts to build an alternate software stack for that, like the very uqmi one. But there's a whole lot of complexity underneath ... ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: Brokenness of the OpenWrt "packages" repo

2021-04-26 Thread Enrico Mioso
... I know you won't like this. But in the end, I guess D-Bus, glib2 and in the end all of MM dependencies will have to be incorporated in the core. A stac, of big big software, I know. But supporting 4G/5G in the end will required that. On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Bjørn Mork wrote: Date: Mon, 26

Re: Installation error for libncursesw6

2021-04-26 Thread Philip Prindeville
> On Mar 1, 2021, at 10:54 PM, Hannu Nyman wrote: > > Philip Prindeville kirjoitti 2.3.2021 klo 0.37: >>> On Mar 1, 2021, at 7:00 AM, Hannu Nyman wrote: >>> >>> Philip Prindeville philipp_subx at redfish-solutions.com wrote at Mon Mar 1 >>> 02:11:20 EST 2021: Is there a workaround to