Re: Interface names when putting 802.1q VLAN on top of bonding configuration

2021-05-27 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 28.05.2021 03:36, Mike Bernardo wrote: I have the below working config, is there a way to get the name to be 'vlan20', instead of 'bonding-lan.20' ? I have tried a bunch of stuff and so far nothing has worked. I don't think you can change Linux interface name. I believe this is how Linux

Interface names when putting 802.1q VLAN on top of bonding configuration

2021-05-27 Thread Mike Bernardo
Hi, I have the below working config, is there a way to get the name to be 'vlan20', instead of 'bonding-lan.20' ? I have tried a bunch of stuff and so far nothing has worked. Thanks for any help! Mike config interface 'loopback' option ifname 'lo' option proto 'static'

[PATCH v3] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW)

2021-05-27 Thread Russell Senior
This patch adds support for the Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW), e.g. PBE-M5-400, a 802.11n wireless with a feed+dish form factor. This device was previously supported by the ar71xx loco-m-xw firmware. Specifications: - Atheros AR9342 SoC - 64 MB RAM - 8 MB SPI flash - 1x 10/100 Mbps Ethernet port,

Re: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW)

2021-05-27 Thread Russell Senior
I am going to send a v3 patch with the redundant mtd-mac-address removed in a few minutes, hopefully in-reply-to this thread if I can manage to do it right. On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 3:01 PM Adrian Schmutzler wrote: > > Hi, > > > -Original Message- > > From: openwrt-devel

[PATCH] ath79: rb4xx-nand: fix 512 byte pages compatibility

2021-05-27 Thread Sergey Ryazanov
MikroTik boards with 512 byte NAND pages require the old YAFFS1 OOB layout for compatibility with the RouterBoot bootloader. The RB4xx NAND driver supports such OOB layout, but checks a NAND page size too early before the flash identification, what effectively preventing the old OOB layout from

RE: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam M (XW)

2021-05-27 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Vincent Wiemann > Sent: Sonntag, 23. Mai 2021 14:20 > To: Russell Senior ; openwrt- > de...@lists.openwrt.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti PowerBeam

[PATCH luci] luci-mod-network: allow setting bridge device MTU and MAC

2021-05-27 Thread Rafał Miłecki
From: Rafał Miłecki Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki --- .../htdocs/luci-static/resources/tools/network.js | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/modules/luci-mod-network/htdocs/luci-static/resources/tools/network.js

Re: [RFC PATCH] ath10k-ct: backport upstream fixes for FragAttacks

2021-05-27 Thread Ben Greear
I am aware, just haven't had time to work on it yet. Thanks, Ben On 5/27/21 4:05 AM, Nick Lowe wrote: Hi Hauke, I wonder if it is worth also opening an issue for this over at https://github.com/greearb/ath10k-ct/issues ? Best, Nick ___

Re: [RFC v2 3/3] ath79: add support for Mikrotik RouterBoard 912G

2021-05-27 Thread Koen Vandeputte
On 23.05.21 11:01, Adrian Schmutzler wrote: ... diff --git a/target/linux/ath79/image/mikrotik.mk b/target/linux/ath79/image/mikrotik.mk index 74f8603b5a..0072ec527d 100644 --- a/target/linux/ath79/image/mikrotik.mk +++ b/target/linux/ath79/image/mikrotik.mk @@ -9,6 +9,15 @@ define

Re: [RFC PATCH] ath10k-ct: backport upstream fixes for FragAttacks

2021-05-27 Thread Nick Lowe
Hi Hauke, I wonder if it is worth also opening an issue for this over at https://github.com/greearb/ath10k-ct/issues ? Best, Nick ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[PATCH] tools/isl: bump to 0.24

2021-05-27 Thread Rui Salvaterra
Tested with Graphite and -floop-nest-optimize, without issues. Signed-off-by: Rui Salvaterra --- tools/isl/Makefile | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/isl/Makefile b/tools/isl/Makefile index c1000e1e31..be372fe2a8 100644 --- a/tools/isl/Makefile +++

[PATCH] ugps: start also in case device is absent

2021-05-27 Thread Daniel Golle
Don't bail out from init script in case the GPS device is missing. Some modems take time to come up, and some people may use things like 'kplex' to feed ugpsd. Hence it is better to always start ugpsd unconditionally and let procd's respawn take care of retrying. Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle ---

[Bug] ag71xx: MTU limited to 1516

2021-05-27 Thread Dominik Kleiser
Hello, I run a batman-adv mesh consisting of several Ubiquiti UniFi AC Mesh Pro. Some of the devices are connected over gigabit ethernet and I want to use the wired connection as a mesh backhaul. This requires setting the ethernet MTU to at least 1528 bytes, since batman-adv prepends its own

[PATCH 3/3] ath79: add support for MikroTik RouterBOARD 912UAG-2HPnD

2021-05-27 Thread Denis Kalashnikov
From: Denis Kalashnikov This board has been supported in the ar71xx. Links: * https://mikrotik.com/product/RB912UAG-2HPnD * https://openwrt.org/toh/hwdata/mikrotik/mikrotik_rb912uag-2hpnd Hardware: * SoC: Atheros AR9342, * RAM: DDR 64MB, * SPI NOR: 64KB, * NAND: 128MB, * Ethernet: x1

[PATCH 2/3] ath79: add NAND driver for MikroTik RB91xG series

2021-05-27 Thread Denis Kalashnikov
From: Denis Kalashnikov Main part is copied from ar71xx original driver rb91x_nand written by Gabor Juhos . What is done: * Support of kernel 5.4 and 5.10, * DTS support, * New gpio API (gpiod_*) support. Signed-off-by: Denis Kalashnikov --- Changelog: RFC v1 --> RFC v2 - Do not use MFD

[PATCH 1/3] ath79: add gpio-latch driver for MikroTik RouterBOARDs

2021-05-27 Thread Denis Kalashnikov
From: Denis Kalashnikov This is a slighty modified version of ar71xx gpio-latch driver written by Gabor Juhos . Changes: * DTS support, * New gpio API (gpiod_*). Signed-off-by: Denis Kalashnikov --- Changelog: RFC v1 --> RFC v2 - Don't use MFD driver API anymore, - Use the new gpio API

[PATCH 0/3] ath79: add support for MikroTik RouterBOARD 912UAG-2HPnD

2021-05-27 Thread Denis Kalashnikov
From: Denis Kalashnikov RB912 needs two ad hoc drivers: gpio-latch and rb91x_nand. So I've ported them from ar71xx and added DTS. In RFC v1 I added a MFD driver that provided API for manipulating shared gpio lines to gpio-latch and nand drivers. In RFC v2 I just ported gpio-latch and rb91x_nand

Re: Flagship AX routers

2021-05-27 Thread Bjørn Mork
John Crispin writes: > that ubnt 6-lr unit boots fine with HEAD and delivers good > performance. It is really hard to get hold of them right now in EU. I > managed to get one as "used" on ebay and after initial testing sent it > off to Daniel s.T. he can give it some loving care in regards to >