imagebuilder for 19.07.9 fails

2022-03-01 Thread Marcel Telka
Hi, I tried to rebuild my firmware using new 19.07.9 imagebuilder on a CentOS 7 host and it failed with this error: [mktplinkfw2] rootfs offset aligned to 0x2017484 [mktplinkfw2] firmware file

[PATCH] iproute2: Remove libxtables from some tc variants

2022-03-01 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
From: Tiago Gaspar This adds the new tc-bpf variant and removes libxtables dependency from the tc-tiny variant. The tc-full variant stays like before and contains everything. This allows to use tc without libxtables. The variants have the following sizes: root@OpenWrt:/# ls -al

Re: [PATCH 1/2] realtek: Use firewall4

2022-03-01 Thread Birger Koblitz
Hi, On 01/03/2022 22:11, Daniel Golle wrote: We may need to add a 'switch' DEVICE_TYPE in include/target.mk selecting packages relevant for this class of devices. ('bridge' or 'ip-full', 'ethtool', ...)Indeed, these devices are really not routers. Let's have the right packages for them

Re: [PATCH 1/2] realtek: Use firewall4

2022-03-01 Thread Daniel Golle
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 09:51:32PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Petr Štetiar writes: > > > Sander Vanheule [2022-02-28 23:00:34]: > > > >> I wonder if it doesn't make more sense to drop the firewall package from > >> the > >> default now, since there is only one interface, unless there is a

Re: [PATCH 1/2] realtek: Use firewall4

2022-03-01 Thread Bjørn Mork
Petr Štetiar writes: > Sander Vanheule [2022-02-28 23:00:34]: > >> I wonder if it doesn't make more sense to drop the firewall package from the >> default now, since there is only one interface, unless there is a different >> reason to keep the firewall. > > 1. consistency With what exactly?

Re: [PATCH] kernel: force atomic renames in ubifs

2022-03-01 Thread Richard Weinberger
Rafał, - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Rafał Miłecki" > An: "OpenWrt Development List" > CC: "Koen Vandeputte" , "richard" > , "Rafał Miłecki" > Gesendet: Dienstag, 1. März 2022 20:13:29 > Betreff: [PATCH] kernel: force atomic renames in ubifs > From: Rafał Miłecki > > This deals

[PATCH] kernel: force atomic renames in ubifs

2022-03-01 Thread Rafał Miłecki
From: Rafał Miłecki This deals with user-spaces apps that don't handle all syncing correctly. It prevents user ending up with an empty file. Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki --- .../510-ubifs-force-atomic-renames.patch | 46 +++ .../510-ubifs-force-atomic-renames.patch |

Re: [PATCH] base-files: call "sync" after initial setup

2022-03-01 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 3/1/22 18:46, Rafał Miłecki wrote: From: Rafał Miłecki OpenWrt uses a lot of (b)ash scripts for initial setup. This isn't the best solution as they almost never consider syncing files / data. Still this is what we have and we need to try living with it. Without proper syncing OpenWrt can

[PATCH] base-files: call "sync" after initial setup

2022-03-01 Thread Rafał Miłecki
From: Rafał Miłecki OpenWrt uses a lot of (b)ash scripts for initial setup. This isn't the best solution as they almost never consider syncing files / data. Still this is what we have and we need to try living with it. Without proper syncing OpenWrt can easily get into an inconsistent state on

Re: [PATCH 1/2] realtek: Use firewall4

2022-03-01 Thread Petr Štetiar
Sander Vanheule [2022-02-28 23:00:34]: Hi, > Commit 9e7149f729e9 ("realtek: revert to "standard" management > configuration") changed the > default port configuration for realtek devices to only have LAN ports, > instead of the > LAN/WAN VLANs that were used before. IMO default device