On Tue, 9 Jan 2024, Paul D wrote:
6GHz seems a starting point nowadays, although I get by with 5GHz.
only if all your clients support 6GHz as well, most don't
* Packages with cases+PSU are a must for broader acceptance,
which explains why the Raspberry Pi bare board is such a failure,
This looks like a great project. I'm sure I would end up buying several units.
Looking at the spec:
> Ethernet: 2x RJ45 (2.5 GbE + 1 GbE)
2.5Gb FTTP is becoming more widely available. It would be better to be able to
match egress and ingress surely as it is a router after all?
1GbE x 2 or
I have often tried to point out that what matters most in wifi is low
interference, better multiplexing across devices, and good bandwidth
*at range*. Up until very recently the 6ghz stuff mostly had terrible
bandwidth, jitter and latency at range, and everyone shipping it
bleeding into all the
wt., 9 sty 2024 o 18:59 Daniel Golle napisał(a):
>
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 06:49:04PM +0100, Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
> > wt., 9 sty 2024 o 18:02 Robert Marko napisał(a):
> > >
> > > On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 17:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 9.01.2024 13:29, John Crispin wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 06:49:04PM +0100, Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
> wt., 9 sty 2024 o 18:02 Robert Marko napisał(a):
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 17:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > >
> > > On 9.01.2024 13:29, John Crispin wrote:
> > > > On 09.01.24 12:56, Robert Marko wrote:
> > > >> ---SNIP---
> >
wt., 9 sty 2024 o 18:02 Robert Marko napisał(a):
>
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 17:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >
> > On 9.01.2024 13:29, John Crispin wrote:
> > > On 09.01.24 12:56, Robert Marko wrote:
> > >> ---SNIP---
> > >>
> > >>> Why not 6GHz?
> > >> 6GHz requires an external card, and I doubt
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 05:52:57PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 9.01.2024 13:29, John Crispin wrote:
> > On 09.01.24 12:56, Robert Marko wrote:
> > > ---SNIP---
> > >
> > > > Why not 6GHz?
> > > 6GHz requires an external card, and I doubt you can fit that in the
> > > target price.
> > >
> >
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 17:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>
> On 9.01.2024 13:29, John Crispin wrote:
> > On 09.01.24 12:56, Robert Marko wrote:
> >> ---SNIP---
> >>
> >>> Why not 6GHz?
> >> 6GHz requires an external card, and I doubt you can fit that in the
> >> target price.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
On 9.01.2024 13:29, John Crispin wrote:
On 09.01.24 12:56, Robert Marko wrote:
---SNIP---
Why not 6GHz?
6GHz requires an external card, and I doubt you can fit that in the
target price.
Regards,
Robert
correct. as mentioned in the email, we wanted to start out small. also upstream
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Please take a look at the PRs here:
https://github.com/openwrt/odhcpd/pulls
They need some attention :)
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi!
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 10:34 PM John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 09.01.24 14:51, Chuanhong Guo wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 6:52 PM John Crispin wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> FAQ
> >>
> >> * Why are there are 2 different flash chips?
> >> - the idea is to make the device (almost!)
On 2024-01-08 16:03, Paul Spooren wrote:
Hi Paul,
PKG_MAINTAINER:=Joe Bloggs
PKG_MAINTAINER_HANDLE:=github: @joe; https://forum.openwrt.org/u/joe/
Plan B
co-opt existing PKG_MAINTAINER field, but perhaps it's possible?
e.g:
PKG_MAINTAINER:=Joe Bloggs , github: @Joe
I think for that you
6GHz seems a starting point nowadays, although I get by with 5GHz.
If the BPi can be extended with add-on cards for exactly this area,
that's a great starting point also.
Ideally sub $100 for any product.
* Packages with cases+PSU are a must for broader acceptance, and to
prevent fatigue
Chuanhong Guo wrote:
>> * What is the purpose of the console USB-C port?
>> - Holtek UART to USB bridge with CDC-ACM support on USB-C makes the
>> device ultra easy to communicate with. No extra hardware or drivers will
>> be required. Android for example has CDC-ACM support
On 09.01.24 14:51, Chuanhong Guo wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 6:52 PM John Crispin wrote:
[...]
FAQ
* Why are there are 2 different flash chips?
- the idea is to make the device (almost!) unbrickable and very easy to
recover
What about a built-in JTAG probe instead of
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 14:59, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> Honestly, if progress is not made towards making GPON accessible in
> FOSS, the next generation of fiber routers will be as locked down as
> cablemodems are. While I do know of many ISPs using active ethernet
> fiber instead, GPON is big in some
Battery power capability? Parts of the world still have their power
flicker regularly. Others can be solar powered. What is the projected
power consumption of this device?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Honestly, if progress is not made towards making GPON accessible in
FOSS, the next generation of fiber routers will be as locked down as
cablemodems are. While I do know of many ISPs using active ethernet
fiber instead, GPON is big in some places.
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 7:39 AM Robert Marko
Hi!
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 6:52 PM John Crispin wrote:
> [...]
> FAQ
>
> * Why are there are 2 different flash chips?
> - the idea is to make the device (almost!) unbrickable and very easy to
> recover
What about a built-in JTAG probe instead of SPI-NOR+USB-UART?
It'll be actually unbrickable
Hello!!
First of all, let me thank You all for this great project.
I wll do my best to buy some units - even tough I am not contributing by any
mean to OpenWrt in terms of code, or very little, I am very passionate about
this project and the overall router freedom.
As most of you know by now,
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 13:38, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> You should talk about this project at FOSSDEM!
>
> Two potential funders off the top of my head:
>
> https://nlnet.nl/funding.html
> https://www.ardc.net/apply/
> Ardc funded the latest round of the librerouter project in argentina,
> which is
You should talk about this project at FOSSDEM!
Two potential funders off the top of my head:
https://nlnet.nl/funding.html
https://www.ardc.net/apply/
Ardc funded the latest round of the librerouter project in argentina,
which is also openwrt based, but intended for outdoor.
a 10 year design
On 09.01.24 12:56, Robert Marko wrote:
---SNIP---
Why not 6GHz?
6GHz requires an external card, and I doubt you can fit that in the
target price.
Regards,
Robert
correct. as mentioned in the email, we wanted to start out small. also
upstream mac80211 is still missing a bunch of 11be
wt., 9 sty 2024 o 13:21 Daniel Golle napisał(a):
>
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 12:56:55PM +0100, Robert Marko wrote:
> > ---SNIP---
> >
> > > Why not 6GHz?
> >
> > 6GHz requires an external card, and I doubt you can fit that in the
> > target price.
>
> Afaik we could use MT7976A as DBDC front-end
On 09.01.24 12:58, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
So are you looking for just a generic interest feedback? Or some
technical comments? What are next steps for this project and do you
could use some community help?
just general feedback. it felt a bit weird to jump straight into voting.
John
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 12:56:55PM +0100, Robert Marko wrote:
> ---SNIP---
>
> > Why not 6GHz?
>
> 6GHz requires an external card, and I doubt you can fit that in the
> target price.
Afaik we could use MT7976A as DBDC front-end supporting 2.4 GHz + 5/6 GHz
instead of MT7976C which only supports
On 9.01.2024 11:49, John Crispin wrote:
If the community likes the idea outlined below in greater details, we would
like to start a vote.
I'm afraid it's a bit unclear what do you expect here ;) People at IRC
started wondering too.
I love idea of this project and I'll surely be interested in
---SNIP---
> Why not 6GHz?
6GHz requires an external card, and I doubt you can fit that in the
target price.
Regards,
Robert
>
> BR
>
>
> Janusz
>
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>
wt., 9 sty 2024 o 11:54 John Crispin napisał(a):
>
> tl;dr
>
> In 2024 the OpenWrt project turns 20 years! Let's celebrate this
> anniversary by launching our own first and fully upstream supported
> hardware design.
>
> If the community likes the idea outlined below in greater details, we
>
tl;dr
In 2024 the OpenWrt project turns 20 years! Let's celebrate this
anniversary by launching our own first and fully upstream supported
hardware design.
If the community likes the idea outlined below in greater details, we
would like to start a vote.
---
The idea
It is not new. We
On 09/01/2024 09:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki
>
> OpenWrt project provides downstream support for thousands of embedded
> home network devices. Its custom requirement for DT is to provide info
> about LEDs roles. Currently it does it by using custom non-documented
> aliases.
From: Rafał Miłecki
OpenWrt project provides downstream support for thousands of embedded
home network devices. Its custom requirement for DT is to provide info
about LEDs roles. Currently it does it by using custom non-documented
aliases. While formally valid (aliases.yaml doesn't limit names
33 matches
Mail list logo
