On 26.03.24 14:39, Paul D wrote:
We have quorum/consensus on this issue. Is it too much to ask that
everyone now follow it, or at least have this token 'vote'?
Where did you see the quorum/consensus? I looked at the links and
couldn't find it.
Triggered by the yggdrasil additions of
John Crispin [2024-03-26 21:10:03]:
Hi,
tl;dr check following kernel commit d4563201f33a ("Documentation: simplify and
clarify DCO contribution example language"), the diff:
-using your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.)
+using a known identity (sorry, no
Hi,
the SoB is a DCO
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developer_Certificate_of_Origin
without a real name DCO is not assignable
John
On 26.03.24 14:39, Paul D wrote:
We have quorum/consensus on this issue. Is it too much to ask that
everyone now follow it, or at least have this token
Sorry to hijack into this thread but about having a more friendly way to
configure the kernel consistently across versions I wrote this little
utility which I sue to configure both Linux Kernel and OpenWrt
programmatically in a way which make it very very easy to upgrade versions
We have quorum/consensus on this issue. Is it too much to ask that
everyone now follow it, or at least have this token 'vote'?
Triggered by the yggdrasil additions of recent.
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/23072
Paul S amended the policy (in packages[1] and openwrt[2] repos) with
