with OpenWrt on a NanoPi R5C
(https://www.friendlyelec.com/index.php?route=product/product_id=290).
I'm not sure if it requires compiling a full custom OpenWrt image from
scratch or just creating a package that can be installed atop vanilla
OpenWrt. Open to hire immediately for this single project.
--
Sam
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 12:59:49PM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> On 15.04.2023 20:02, Sam Kuper wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 12:44:12PM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>> These are the ideas I've been thinking about for the future of
>>> OpenWrt for a while. It loo
mbed to entropy in
the meantime.
Thank you,
Sam
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
This adds support for pc-engines-apu4, which, aside from having 4 LAN
ports, is nearly the same as the already-supported apu[123] variants.
Signed-off-by: Sam Lunt
diff --git a/target/linux/x86/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds
b/target/linux/x86/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds
index 74ad2d59fe
warra... - Hacker News":
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29816098
)
At this point I've raised all my objections about GitHub. The sole
major objection that I didn't raise - the fact that GitHub is not
accessible to users reliant on IPv6 - has already been raised by others.
Than
sh, nor why that would be relevant.)
> I just want to say that I personally agree with this concern and still
> for me it looks like GH is at least not a worse option even from this
> point of view.
Codeberg and SourceHut both seem to be better than GitHub on this front.
Best wishes
involvement.)
I will write to SourceHut and CodeBerg to ask whether they block users
by territory.
Sam
--
A: When it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: When is top-posting a bad thing?
() ASCII ribbon campaign. Please avoid HTML emails & proprietary
/\ fi
Could not find one myself, but
perhaps my search-fu is off today.)
If not, I will aim to post one, referencing this discussion thread.
Thanks again,
Sam
> A quick bug tracker conclusion, I'd be happy to use codeberg.org for
> issue tracking. Both sr.ht and codeberg.org are FOSS, GitHub no
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 08:02:30PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Sam Kuper writes:
>> Not everyone has, or can have, a Microsoft (GitHub) account.
>
> Please explain.
>
> These terms are pretty much identical:
>
>
> https://docs.github.com/en/github/site-policy/git
ove OpenWRT core infrastructure to GitHub.
> so the resource-limited core developers can focus on evolving openwrt
> itself, instead of spending cycles on its infrastructure.
If OpenWRT devs/maintainers want to outsource code/bug-hosting, please
look at accessible FOSS hosts like Sour
ssibility and privacy
flaws, compared to other options - and fails ethical code/bug-hosting
criteria: https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html
Please either stick with existing arrangements, or go with an ethical,
accessible code/bug-host (e.g. SourceHut https://sr.ht ).
Tha
day.
>
> [..] Awesome, thanks.
Thank you, David, for this. (And for maintaining infradead generally!)
Best,
Sam
--
A: When it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: When is top-posting a bad thing?
() ASCII ribbon campaign. Please avoid HTML emails & proprietar
atch/a355cb9d-9b07-4d62-a228-a37c2660c...@apple.com/
> for mailing list: netfilter-de...@vger.kernel.org
I don't know which headers Patchwork requires in order to be able to
process an email correctly, but if it requires a non-empty "Subject:"
header, then see:
https://mail.python.org
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 06:57:53PM -0500, Etienne Champetier wrote:
> Le sam. 23 janv. 2021 à 18:09, Sam Kuper a écrit :
>> I suggest that if a vote is held, it should be a three-way vote
>> between the following outcomes (which should probably be mutually
>> exclusive):
>
he wiki page idea.
I suggest that if a vote is held, it should be a three-way vote between
the following outcomes (which should probably be mutually exclusive):
- OpenWRT Jobs wiki page;
- openwrt-jobs mailing list;
- Do nothing.
Sam
P.S. I don't have an opinion on whether such a vote should b
ot reasonable to have this by default in a release.
>
> I don't agree. It has to be default in the next release :-)
+1
>> I'm working on adding persistent connection support to opkg but it's
>> not straightforward.
>
> Great, thanks!
+1
Thanks to both of you for you
ious user, setting up a router for the first time, is
likely to keep it disconnected from the Internet (either
physically, or firewalled/blocked by an upstream device) until sure
it has been configured to their requirements. Also, routers used
in some local networks should n
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 12:10:17AM +0200, Alberto Bursi wrote:
> On 07/10/20 15:34, abnoeh wrote:
>>> However, I think you are assuming a RA/DHCP-based WAN connection.
>>> For PPPoE (which is still a thing in a lot of places, including
>>> developing world, where last mile is often wifi), this
who develops/maintains
OpenWRT. Likewise thank you to everyone who campaigns in favour of
libre software and against software patents. I think we are all pretty
much on the same side here in principle, we just need to agree on an
implementation :)
Sam
--
A: When it messes up the order in which peo
seem wise for OpenWRT devs to seek advice on the proposal, from
SPI and/or SFC.
Best wishes,
Sam
--
A: When it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: When is top-posting a bad thing?
() ASCII ribbon campaign. Please avoid HTML emails & proprietary
/\
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 01:21:26PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 6:09 AM Sam Kuper wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 10:55:37AM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 07:11:13PM +0300, Etienne Champetier wrote:
>>>> Le lun. 3 août 202
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 10:55:37AM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 07:11:13PM +0300, Etienne Champetier wrote:
>> Le lun. 3 août 2020 à 00:04, Rosen Penev a écrit :
>>> Whenever discussion about patents arise, I usually point to Fedora
>>> whose paren
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 07:11:13PM +0300, Etienne Champetier wrote:
> Le lun. 3 août 2020 à 00:04, Rosen Penev a écrit :
>> The remerged OpenWrt project is legally represented by the Software
>> in the Public Interest (SPI) - an US 501(c)(3) non-profit
>> organization which is managing our OpenWrt
ly by people who value security and
therefore choose it over proprietary alternatives. Consequently, it is
a "target-rich environment".
For this reason, I would urge the OpenWRT devs *not* to switch to any
web-based software that requires visitors to browse with JavaScript
enable
d trigger bugs with the
current scripts.
So, I would also be glad if Jordan's suggestion (& patch) could be
accepted.
Thank you for hearing me out, & thanks again for developing/maintaining
OpenWRT!
Sam
--
A: When it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: When i
website, but have
also tried 18.06.x.
The issue is described in more detail with reproduction steps at
https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details_id=3094
Thanks,
Sam
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https
this further.
Thanks
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 6:00 PM Sam Samy wrote:
>
> > Yes, the implemented method for reading the data is not correct for the
> > wave 2 cards (and maybe also other). You can try the attached hack. At
> > least this worked in 2017 when I've poke
anks
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 1:33 AM Sven Eckelmann wrote:
>
> On Monday, 13 May 2019 22:58:00 CEST Sam Samy wrote:
> > I installed master branch openwrt onto Asus MAP-AC2200 AP. It has tri
> > band. Its based on IPQ4019 DK04 QCA reference platform. 2 radios
> > (2Ghz/5
M Sven Eckelmann wrote:
>
> On Monday, 13 May 2019 22:58:00 CEST Sam Samy wrote:
> > I installed master branch openwrt onto Asus MAP-AC2200 AP. It has tri
> > band. Its based on IPQ4019 DK04 QCA reference platform. 2 radios
> > (2Ghz/5Ghz) on AHB bus and one 5GHZ on PCIe bu
Hi,
I installed master branch openwrt onto Asus MAP-AC2200 AP. It has tri
band. Its based on IPQ4019 DK04 QCA reference platform. 2 radios
(2Ghz/5Ghz) on AHB bus and one 5GHZ on PCIe bus. Its generally working
fine except one problem in 5Ghz. On both the 5Ghz radios the RSSI is
pretty low on any
Hi,
Did this ever get resolved?
I would like to help resolve it so please advise ASAP.
Thanks,
Sam
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi, all,
i try to compile openwrt with external toolchain, and it fails when
compile ther kernel.
i check the TARGET_CROSS in rules.mk and make a little modification.
and compile success.
i don't know if someone has fixed this issue. the patch below works well
on my environment.
diff
Hi, all,
i try to compile openwrt with external toolchain, and it fails when
compile ther kernel.
i check the TARGET_CROSS in rules.mk and make a little modification.
and compile success.
i don't know if someone has fixed this issue. the patch below works well
on my environment.
diff
33 matches
Mail list logo
