Hi,
I have a Wandboard and an i.mx233 board already with patches locally. I
leave it up to Kaloz and co. to decide what'll happen with those.
Thanks,
Zoltan H
Michael Heimpold wrote:
Hi,
+ARCH:=arm
+BOARD:=imx61
I'm working on patches to add support for Freescale i.MX28 based
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:13:52PM -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Imre Kaloz ka...@openwrt.org wrote:
diff --git a/target/linux/imx61/base-**files/lib/imx61.sh
b/target/linux/imx61/base-**files/lib/imx61.sh
new file mode 100644
index 000..527330e
---
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 07:48:17AM +0200, Imre Kaloz wrote:
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:13:52 +0200, Tim Harvey thar...@gateworks.com wrote:
Thanks for reviewing Imre! I'll submit a follow patch after a few days if
there is more discussion.
Okay, I'll help cleaning up that one as well, so we can
Hi,
+ARCH:=arm
+BOARD:=imx61
I'm working on patches to add support for Freescale i.MX28 based boards,
not yet published, but I've choosen BOARD:=mxs
This is like the kernel already does in arm/mach-mxs.
Does it make sense for you to choose BOARD:=imx ?
(i.MX61 is mach-imx I guess)
BR,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 05:43:03 +0200, Tim Harvey thar...@gateworks.com wrote:
This adds support for a new target architecture: i.MX61
This is based on the current 3.8.6 kernel with the following additions:
- PCIe Root Complex driver supporting bridge transactions and MSI
- DeviceTree support
Hello Tim,
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:13:52 +0200, Tim Harvey thar...@gateworks.com wrote:
snip
Thanks for reviewing Imre! I'll submit a follow patch after a few days if
there is more discussion.
Okay, I'll help cleaning up that one as well, so we can minimize the changes to
be reviewed.
