On 06/05/11 15:16, John Crispin wrote:
On 06/05/11 15:13, Peter Lebbing wrote:
So, can someone please commit my patch,
http://patchwork.midlink.org/patch/906/ ?
patch looks ok, let me apply it
Problems?
Peter.
--
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You
On 09/05/11 16:01, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 06/05/11 15:16, John Crispin wrote:
On 06/05/11 15:13, Peter Lebbing wrote:
So, can someone please commit my patch,
http://patchwork.midlink.org/patch/906/ ?
patch looks ok, let me apply it
Problems?
Peter.
apart from not liking this
Hi,
a very silly question is therer a 2/2 to go with this 1/2 patch ?
John
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On 09/05/11 16:01, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 06/05/11 15:16, John Crispin wrote:
On 06/05/11 15:13, Peter Lebbing wrote:
So, can someone please commit my patch,
http://patchwork.midlink.org/patch/906/ ?
patch looks ok, let me apply it
Problems?
Peter.
applied in r26865, thx !
On 09/05/11 16:10, John Crispin wrote:
On 09/05/11 16:01, Peter Lebbing wrote:
Problems?
apart from not liking this rather impolite single word style of
(mis-)communication i think there are no problems.
Oh, I'm very sorry. It was in no way meant to be impolite. It was simply
meant to have
On 09/05/11 18:21, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 09/05/11 16:10, John Crispin wrote:
On 09/05/11 16:01, Peter Lebbing wrote:
Problems?
apart from not liking this rather impolite single word style of
(mis-)communication i think there are no problems.
Oh, I'm very sorry. It was in no way meant to
On 09/05/11 17:22, John Crispin wrote:
a very silly question is therer a 2/2 to go with this 1/2 patch ?
That is a patch that I posted to have it available to people, but not for
inclusion in OpenWRT yet.
From my 0/2 mail:
I am submitting for inclusion in OpenWRT the driver for the M
On 09/05/11 18:36, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 09/05/11 17:22, John Crispin wrote:
a very silly question is therer a 2/2 to go with this 1/2 patch ?
That is a patch that I posted to have it available to people, but not for
inclusion in OpenWRT yet.
From my 0/2 mail:
I am submitting for
On 09/05/11 17:24, John Crispin wrote:
applied in r26865, thx !
Thanks, great!
Peter.
--
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
My key is available at http://wwwhome.cs.utwente.nl/~lebbing/pubkey.txt
On 06/05/11 15:13, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 02/05/11 14:01, John Crispin wrote:
after the very long thread on the ML, i figure no one was aware that the
patch was complete.
So, can someone please commit my patch,
http://patchwork.midlink.org/patch/906/ ?
(Or tell me why not...)
Thanks,
Luka Perkov wrote:
Patch tested on D-Link 584T DSL router with ADM6996M chip. Works.
Please commit.
Can I please ask why my patch isn't committed?
Also, what is the Recommended Nag Interval for asking about this? ;P
Peter.
PS: CC'd Felix as the original author of the driver, and possible
On 02/05/11 13:57, Peter Lebbing wrote:
Luka Perkov wrote:
Patch tested on D-Link 584T DSL router with ADM6996M chip. Works.
Please commit.
Can I please ask why my patch isn't committed?
yes you can
Also, what is the Recommended Nag Interval for asking about this? ;P
trial and error,
This patch adds 802.1Q VLAN support for the ADM6996M chip.
The driver is loaded for both the FC and M model. It will detect which of the
two chips is connected. The FC model is initialised, but no further
functionality is offered.
The PHY driver will always report 100 Mbit/s, link up, for both
Patch tested on D-Link 584T DSL router with ADM6996M chip. Works.
Please commit.
Luka
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 07:16:56PM +0200, Peter Lebbing wrote:
This patch adds 802.1Q VLAN support for the ADM6996M chip.
The driver is loaded for both the FC and M model. It will detect which of the
two
14 matches
Mail list logo
