[OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt/LEDE v17.01.6 service release

The OpenWrt Community is proud to announce the sixth service release of the stable OpenWrt/LEDE 17.01 series. OpenWrt/LEDE 17.01.6 “Reboot” incorporates a fair number of fixes back ported from the development branch during the last 2 months. Some selected highlights of the service release are:

[OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt/LEDE v17.01.5 service release

The OpenWrt Community is proud to announce the Fifth service release of stable OpenWrt/LEDE 17.01 series, which is the first service release after the remerger of the LEDE and OpenWrt projects. OpenWrt/LEDE 17.01.5 “Reboot” incorporates a fair number of fixes back ported from the development

[OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt LEDE merge

The OpenWrt and the LEDE project are happily announcing the unification of both projects under the OpenWrt name. After long and sometimes slowly moving discussions about the specifics of the re-merge, with multiple similar proposals but little subsequent action, we're happy to announce that both

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt -> LEDE git tree merge

22.10.2017 22:56, Hauke Mehrtens: On 10/22/2017 10:28 PM, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: Hi, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: Hi Hauke, On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: I am working on merging the missing commits from the OpenWrt git repository into the LEDE repository. Here is a list of all non

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt -> LEDE git tree merge

On 10/22/2017 08:46 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on merging the missing commits from the OpenWrt git > repository into the LEDE repository. > > Here is a list of all non merge commits from the OpenWrt git repository > and their corresponding LEDE commit IDs: >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt -> LEDE git tree merge

On 10/22/2017 10:28 PM, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: > Hi, > > Zoltan HERPAI wrote: >> Hi Hauke, >> >> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >> >>> I am working on merging the missing commits from the OpenWrt git >>> repository into the LEDE repository. >>> >>> Here is a list of all non merge

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt -> LEDE git tree merge

On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: > Hi, > > > Zoltan HERPAI wrote: >> >> Hi Hauke, >> >> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >> >>> I am working on merging the missing commits from the OpenWrt git >>> repository into the LEDE repository. >>> >>> Here

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt -> LEDE git tree merge

Hi, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: Hi Hauke, On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: I am working on merging the missing commits from the OpenWrt git repository into the LEDE repository. Here is a list of all non merge commits from the OpenWrt git repository and their corresponding LEDE commit

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt -> LEDE git tree merge

On 10/22/2017 11:46 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on merging the missing commits from the OpenWrt git > repository into the LEDE repository. > > Here is a list of all non merge commits from the OpenWrt git repository > and their corresponding LEDE commit IDs: >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt -> LEDE git tree merge

Hi Hauke, On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: I am working on merging the missing commits from the OpenWrt git repository into the LEDE repository. Here is a list of all non merge commits from the OpenWrt git repository and their corresponding LEDE commit IDs:

[OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt -> LEDE git tree merge

Hi, I am working on merging the missing commits from the OpenWrt git repository into the LEDE repository. Here is a list of all non merge commits from the OpenWrt git repository and their corresponding LEDE commit IDs: https://github.com/hauke/openwrt-lede-merge/blob/master/commits.csv I only

[OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt/LEDE summit dates

This year's OpenWrt/LEDE summit should take place in Prague in October around Embedded Linux Conference Europe (ELCE). OpenWrt/LEDE summit 2017 will not be collocated with ELCE and be free of charge as of the current planning. This event is in the early planning phase, see the website of last

[OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt/LEDE job offer (devolo AG)

Hi OpenWrt/LEDE developers To intensify OpenWrt/LEDE development devolo AG is looking for . Software Engineer - Embedded Linux . Head of Engineering. Place of work would be Aachen, Germany. Unfortunately the job offers are available in German only:

[OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt/LEDE job offer (devolo AG)

Hi OpenWrt/LEDE developers To intensify OpenWrt/LEDE development devolo AG is looking for · Software Engineer - Embedded Linux · Head of Engineering. Place of work would be Aachen, Germany. Unfortunately the job offers are available in German only:

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt] [LEDE-DEV] Project proposal: The GNUnet of autonomous Things

On 2016-12-01 16:05, Daniel Golle wrote: > Hi Sukru, > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 08:52:57PM +, Sukru Senli wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> Regarding (Phase 2 - ubus rpc proxy), I had opened a thread in October: >> https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2016-October/042252.html >> >>

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt] [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 for OpenWrt

qi_w...@people2000.net tie_y...@people2000.net Dirk Feytons 于2016年6月1日 周三04:49写道： > On 30 May 2016 at 11:58, Delbar Jos wrote: > >> Felix Fietkau wrote: >> > > We are conscious of the fact that together with the proposals

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt] [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 for OpenWrt

On 30 May 2016 at 11:58, Delbar Jos wrote: > Felix Fietkau wrote: > > > We are conscious of the fact that together with the proposals made by > > > Felix, Luka and Wojtek we are now looking at many "competing" > proposals. > > > As a next step,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt] [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 for OpenWrt

I'm certainly supportive of bringing as many people involved as possible. As Jos mentioned, there's likely some approval processes at many companies that need to happen to release the source for public review. Eric On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Delbar Jos wrote:

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

Dear Jo-Philipp Wich On 26.05.2016 13:43, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Hi all, > > I think the status quo has now been described several times and can be > summarized as: ... I'm just a lurker on this list but this is exactly the kind of email I have missed in the past. I have no moral right to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

Dear Kathy, > I appreciate your well-written summary and the notable improvements. > Moving to git and keeping history, improving the web site and > documentation to enable more collaboration, making workflows more > efficient and open, etc. had been discussed during face-to-face > gatherings of

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

Wow. What a great email !!! OpenWrt core people who have decided to stay with the project think carefully about it. In my humble vision reunite with LEDE new ideas and keeping the well stabilished OpenWrt name is the ideal scenario. Put aside the diferences and makd an effort for this to happen.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Hi all, > > I think the status quo has now been described several times and can be > summarized as: > > - Launching the new LEDE project/fork/reboot without discussing >matters in advance with the developers not being

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

Hi all, I think the status quo has now been described several times and can be summarized as: - Launching the new LEDE project/fork/reboot without discussing matters in advance with the developers not being involved was perceived in a hostile action damaging OpenWrt - It has been

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

On 25 May 2016 at 10:09, mbm wrote: > The hackers email address represents the primary point of contact for > OpenWrt, particularly in regards to donations. Following the surprise LEDE > announcement, forwarding rules for @openwrt.org email addresses were > disabled. This was

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

mbm writes: > The hackers email address represents the primary point of contact for > OpenWrt, particularly in regards to donations. Following the surprise > LEDE announcement, forwarding rules for @openwrt.org email addresses > were disabled. This was done to mitigate further

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 17:56:38 -0400 From: Daniel Dickinson<open...@daniel.thecshore.com> To: OpenWrt Development List<openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE Message-ID: <1464126998.1239.137.camel@homehost> Content-Type: text/plain; char

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 23:26:37 +0200 From: Rafał Miłecki<zaj...@gmail.com> To: Hauke Mehrtens<ha...@hauke-m.de> Cc: OpenWrt Development List<openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>, LEDE Development List<lede-...@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE Message-ID:

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 21:19 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > > > Let's just save such non-sense sense of culture and expectation > > > discussion in another place. > > Perhaps the issue is the notion of a monolithic culture - that is *not* > what meant. There are variations and subgroups, and

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 20:57 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 08:45 +0800, Yousong Zhou wrote: > > > > > > To a certain extent you yourself acknowledge individual opinion (with > > > you over a beer comment), but you seem to think that such a view of > > > individual

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 08:45 +0800, Yousong Zhou wrote: > > > > To a certain extent you yourself acknowledge individual opinion (with > > you over a beer comment), but you seem to think that such a view of > > individual opinions are not as valid in the public domain, whereas our > > expectation

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

On 25 May 2016 at 07:56, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 18:18 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote: >> On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 23:57 +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: >> [snip] >> > Hi, >> > >> I would like to see a reunion of LEDE and OpenWrt, so do any of the non

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 23:57 +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: [snip] > Hi, > >> I would like to see a reunion of LEDE and OpenWrt, so do any of the non > >> LEDE but OpenWrt core devs have any problems with the LEDE rules and so on? > >> > > This is my personal opinion and this was not somehow

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 18:18 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 23:57 +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: > [snip] > > Hi, > > >> I would like to see a reunion of LEDE and OpenWrt, so do any of the non > > >> LEDE but OpenWrt core devs have any problems with the LEDE rules and so > >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 00:23 +0300, Roman Yeryomin wrote: [snip] > > I do not plan to contribute much to OpenWrt any more and I do not know > > if I can commit anything any more, at least it looks like I was kicked > > from the openwrt-hackers mailing list without informing me. > > I believe

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

Hi, On 05/24/2016 10:31 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: As it looks like the IRC meeting will not happen, because not so big interest by the people not already involved in LEDE and problems finding a time, lets discuss on the mailing list like suggested by Jow. The point you are missing is that

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

On 24 May 2016 at 22:31, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > As it looks like the IRC meeting will not happen, because not so big > interest by the people not already involved in LEDE and problems finding > a time, lets discuss on the mailing list like suggested by Jow. > > Currently it

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

On 24 May 2016 at 23:31, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > Hi, > > As it looks like the IRC meeting will not happen, because not so big > interest by the people not already involved in LEDE and problems finding > a time, lets discuss on the mailing list like suggested by Jow. > >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

add lede-dev On 05/24/2016 10:31 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > Hi, > > As it looks like the IRC meeting will not happen, because not so big > interest by the people not already involved in LEDE and problems finding > a time, lets discuss on the mailing list like suggested by Jow. > > Currently it

[OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt / LEDE

Hi, As it looks like the IRC meeting will not happen, because not so big interest by the people not already involved in LEDE and problems finding a time, lets discuss on the mailing list like suggested by Jow. Currently it looks like only Luka is working on OpenWrt as he committed many patches