2013/8/3 Jonas Gorski j...@openwrt.org:
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Personally I'm playing with Broadcom devices, but my friend asked me
for help with WNDR4300. It's a device very similar to the WNDR3700v4.
2013/8/3 John Crispin j...@phrozen.org:
On 03/08/13 16:04, Chirag Chhatriwala wrote:
So what does this mean for the future of OpenWrt on NAND based devices?
It seems like there are quite a few new and upcoming devices making use
of NAND flash exclusively. If squashfs (which according to me
On 05/08/13 08:13, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
2013/8/3 John Crispinj...@phrozen.org:
On 03/08/13 16:04, Chirag Chhatriwala wrote:
So what does this mean for the future of OpenWrt on NAND based devices?
It seems like there are quite a few new and upcoming devices making use
of NAND flash
2013/8/5 John Crispin j...@phrozen.org:
On 05/08/13 08:13, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
2013/8/3 John Crispinj...@phrozen.org:
On 03/08/13 16:04, Chirag Chhatriwala wrote:
So what does this mean for the future of OpenWrt on NAND based devices?
It seems like there are quite a few new and upcoming
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 10:13 AM, John Crispin j...@phrozen.org wrote:
Hi,
why so negative ? no one said we are throwing the towel ... in general
those targets using nand need to be converted to using an intermediate
layer such as ubi, which several targets already do.
John,
Sorry, I did
Hi,
Personally I'm playing with Broadcom devices, but my friend asked me
for help with WNDR4300. It's a device very similar to the WNDR3700v4.
http://wikidevi.com/wiki/Netgear_WNDR3700v4
http://wikidevi.com/wiki/Netgear_WNDR4300
http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/netgear/wndr3700
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Personally I'm playing with Broadcom devices, but my friend asked me
for help with WNDR4300. It's a device very similar to the WNDR3700v4.
http://wikidevi.com/wiki/Netgear_WNDR3700v4
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Jonas Gorski j...@openwrt.org wrote:
No, this is a generic NAND flash problem.
The issue is that squashfs has no bad block management at all and
requires all blocks on order; but for proper NAND bad block management
you also need to be able to skip bad blocks
On 03/08/13 16:04, Chirag Chhatriwala wrote:
So what does this mean for the future of OpenWrt on NAND based devices?
It seems like there are quite a few new and upcoming devices making use
of NAND flash exclusively. If squashfs (which according to me has been
the filesystem of choice on my
