Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ? Or seperate name for Trunk?

On 11/09/2015 08:53, Etienne Champetier wrote: > > > 2015-09-11 8:46 GMT+02:00 John Crispin >: > > > > On 11/09/2015 08:39, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > On 11 September 2015 at 07:51, John Crispin

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ? Or seperate name for Trunk?

On 11 September 2015 at 07:51, John Crispin wrote: > On 11/09/2015 07:18, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> On 9 September 2015 at 17:24, Tobias Welz wrote: >>> BTW: Why does the trunk has to be "renamed". The trunk is always recent, so >>> it could also have a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ? Or seperate name for Trunk?

2015-09-11 8:46 GMT+02:00 John Crispin : > > > On 11/09/2015 08:39, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > On 11 September 2015 at 07:51, John Crispin wrote: > >> On 11/09/2015 07:18, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >>> On 9 September 2015 at 17:24, Tobias Welz

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ? Or seperate name for Trunk?

On 11/09/2015 08:39, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 11 September 2015 at 07:51, John Crispin wrote: >> On 11/09/2015 07:18, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> On 9 September 2015 at 17:24, Tobias Welz wrote: BTW: Why does the trunk has to be "renamed". The trunk is

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ? Or seperate name for Trunk?

2015-09-11 8:59 GMT+02:00 John Crispin : > > > On 11/09/2015 08:53, Etienne Champetier wrote: > > > > > > 2015-09-11 8:46 GMT+02:00 John Crispin > >: > > > > > > > > On 11/09/2015 08:39, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > > On 11

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ? Or seperate name for Trunk?

John Crispin wrote at Fri Sep 11 08:59:01 CEST 2015: > yes, once all the stuff required for doing so is resolved :) as you may have noticed CC-final is already uploaded to the dl server. we did basic testing already and all seems well. only missing bit is that the folder currently shows a 403

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ? Or seperate name for Trunk?

IMHO, I would avoid "normal releases" rule as, at some time in future, OpenWRT might hopefully hit T..T.. name. Trunk, unstable or anything like this might be better. Regards, Em qui, 10 de set de 2015 às 17:58, escreveu: > How about Trusty Trunk.. no cocktail though.. so

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ? Or seperate name for Trunk?

On 11/09/2015 07:18, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 9 September 2015 at 17:24, Tobias Welz wrote: >> BTW: Why does the trunk has to be "renamed". The trunk is always recent, so >> it could also have a persistent name like "Bleeding Edge" (BTW: is this a >> cocktail?) and it would be

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ? Or seperate name for Trunk?

On 9 September 2015 at 17:24, Tobias Welz wrote: > BTW: Why does the trunk has to be "renamed". The trunk is always recent, so > it could also have a persistent name like "Bleeding Edge" (BTW: is this a > cocktail?) and it would be always clear, that you are on the trunk. Similar

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ? Or seperate name for Trunk?

Just following up with the T... T... idea - I found some T T Cocktails: Tahitian Tea Tahitian Treat Tanqueray Tonic Tanzanian Tonic Am 09.09.2015 um 19:57 schrieb Hannu Nyman: Tobias Welz wrote at Wed Sep 9 17:24:14 CEST 2015: > So I absolutely vote for some clear consistent naming of the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ? Or seperate name for Trunk?

How about Trusty Trunk.. no cocktail though.. so far.. ede On 10.09.2015 22:08, Tobias Welz wrote: > Just following up with the T... T... idea - I found some T T Cocktails: > > Tahitian Tea > Tahitian Treat > Tanqueray Tonic > Tanzanian Tonic > > > > Am 09.09.2015 um 19:57 schrieb Hannu

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ?

2015-09-09 15:20 GMT+02:00 Hannu Nyman : > I repeat my earlier wish that trunk should be renamed as soon as possible. > > There has been several changes during the summer that have made trunk to > significantly deviate from the CC branch. Some of the changes are under the >

[OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ?

I repeat my earlier wish that trunk should be renamed as soon as possible. There has been several changes during the summer that have made trunk to significantly deviate from the CC branch. Some of the changes are under the hood (like musl vs. uClibc), but especially the recent telnet removal

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ? Or seperate name for Trunk?

We ran into this issue recently, where the switch to musl subtly changed the regexp behavior of grep, and where it took a while to realize that the reporter was on musl while all other testing machines where not. Having had a "DD rNN” version string somewhere early in the report

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ? Or seperate name for Trunk?

Tobias Welz wrote at Wed Sep 9 17:24:14 CEST 2015: > So I absolutely vote for some clear consistent naming of the trunk and seperate names for the releases. (What about some Cocktail with a letter from the end of the alphabet like Z Z or X X in case there exists one) On that

[OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ?

Please rename trunk to Dxxx Dxxx something. It is a bit confusing when both trunk and CC15.05 claim to be Chaos Calmer. The clear identification of the two got more important now when trunk has started to use musl, and trunk and CC start to deviate further. I considered patching trunk's

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ?

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 03:58:34PM +0300, Hannu Nyman wrote: Please rename trunk to Dxxx Dxxx something. It is a bit confusing when both trunk and CC15.05 claim to be Chaos Calmer. The clear identification of the two got more important now when trunk has started to use musl, and trunk and CC