Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

OpenWRT and LEDE/[OpenWRT] folks: I do not have any interest of my own in seeing particular individuals take upon certain roles or getting privileges. I am not friends with anyone here. In fact, this is my first submission to this forum. With respect to individuals and their roles, I am a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

On 06/27/2016 11:39 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Hi Zoltan, > > we started a discussion on OpenWrt re-merge conditions over at lede-dev > and waited for a while to solicit more feedback. > > Since no other people expressed further wishes and since you repeatedly > asked for a list of things

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

On 2016-06-27 11:56, mbm wrote: > Am I correct in assuming that this is also a statement that the LEDE > members will assist in accomplishing the tasks mentioned? From my side, yes - as long as we agree about the tasks in question. - Felix ___

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

Hi Mike, given sufficient and reasonable agreements I am certainly willing to help implementing our desired changes. Regards, Jo ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

Am I correct in assuming that this is also a statement that the LEDE members will assist in accomplishing the tasks mentioned? On 6/27/2016 2:39 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: Hi Zoltan, we started a discussion on OpenWrt re-merge conditions over at lede-dev and waited for a while to solicit

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

Hi Zoltan, we started a discussion on OpenWrt re-merge conditions over at lede-dev and waited for a while to solicit more feedback. Since no other people expressed further wishes and since you repeatedly asked for a list of things the LEDE folks would like to see in OpenWrt I'm going to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

, lede-adm Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 15:22:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5756c13c.6040...@uid0.hu> References: <1465294394.3094.78.camel@homehost> <5756c13c.6040...@uid0.hu> Face:

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

On 2016-06-08 11:12, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: >> Which exact goal are you referring to? Imho a 'split' never happened, >> everybody kept contributing to both projects. > Let me argue with that: > > 2016-06-07: 08:59 Changeset [49379] by nbd > treewide: fix replace nbd@… with nbd@… Signed-off-by: … >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

On 8 June 2016 at 11:12, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: > Daniel Golle wrote: >> Which exact goal are you referring to? Imho a 'split' never happened, >> everybody kept contributing to both projects. > > Let me argue with that: > > 2016-06-07: 08:59 Changeset [49379] by nbd > treewide: fix

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

Hey Daniel, Daniel Golle wrote: Hi! On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:42:36PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: ... The official line - which I should have sent out a few days ago - from the OpenWrt team is: Felix's initial comment was LEDE to become a "development environment" for new ideas, and

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

El 7/6/16 a las 14:42, Zoltan HERPAI escribió: > Daniel Dickinson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I had a few emails on this topic I thought better of sending, but I'm >> sure I'm not the only one wondering why the remaining OpenWrt devs have >> not responded to the various LEDE overtures on this mailing

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:42:36PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: > May I ask you to point to which e-mail are you referring to? We are > yet to see an official line from LEDE on what they want to see to > happen in OpenWrt. > i don't think you'll get anything more official than jow's mail from may

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

On Tue, 7 Jun 2016, Eric Schultz wrote: Zoltan, I'm pleased to hear there's been some movement. Does this mean that OpenWrt is going to have releases while LEDE will not? Considering that LEDE folks recently posted a "what's blocking the release" message, this would be extremely unlikely.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

Zoltan, I'm pleased to hear there's been some movement. Does this mean that OpenWrt is going to have releases while LEDE will not? Eric On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: > Daniel Dickinson wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I had a few emails on this topic I thought

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

Hi! On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:42:36PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: > ... > The official line - which I should have sent out a few days ago - from the > OpenWrt team is: > > > Felix's initial comment was LEDE to become a "development environment" for > new ideas, and to keep OpenWrt as the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

Daniel Dickinson wrote: Hi, I had a few emails on this topic I thought better of sending, but I'm sure I'm not the only one wondering why the remaining OpenWrt devs have not responded to the various LEDE overtures on this mailing list. Is it lack of time, an unwillingness to attempt to have an

[OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

iVBORw0KGgoNSUhEUgAAADAwAQMAAABtzGvEBlBMVEX///8AAABVwtN+eklEQVQY04XQzQ2EIBAF4IdMDIc5UAIlUIKlWMr0ZiMm28jOj+6iMXEOfBBmXgJAVLGlBkU3wcZ9I3Q7EdrAveowx6hZ0q6QJDsRnHlJwr+W4CHF7vLqTEenXABeUnSssbP8SdwdjTHEwcFDtQGKFuWjH8Lna8vAmfEF3NMPdAOsBscASUVORK5CYII= Content-Type: text/plain;