On 25/08/2021 21:01, Stijn Tintel wrote:
> On 24/08/2021 15:41, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
> + reg = <0x00 0x1>;
> + label = "NOR (RW) LANNER RCW Code";
Labels here might need some refactoring, too.
>>> Since we're not really touching
On 24/08/2021 15:41, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
> Hi,
>
+ reg = <0x00 0x1>;
+ label = "NOR (RW) LANNER RCW Code";
>>> Labels here might need some refactoring, too.
>> Since we're not really touching anything on the NOR (yet), I prefer to
>> keep the
Hi,
> >
> >> + reg = <0x00 0x1>;
> >> + label = "NOR (RW) LANNER RCW Code";
> > Labels here might need some refactoring, too.
> Since we're not really touching anything on the NOR (yet), I prefer to
> keep the OEM names for now. What else would you suggest?
<>___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On 22/08/21 14:51, Stijn Tintel wrote:
On 22/08/2021 14:35, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
+
+ port@5 {
+ status = "disabled";
+
+ reg = "<5>";
+ label = "cpu1";
+
On 22/08/21 13:06, Stijn Tintel wrote:
The T1042 CPU in the M200 is e5500, as opposed to the e6500 in the M300.
As Rui already explained, the T1042 does not support AltiVec, which musl
expects for all PPC64 CPUs. I was able to boot Linux on it after
patching the vector instructions out of the
On 22/08/2021 14:35, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
>> On Behalf Of Stijn Tintel
>> Sent: Sonntag, 22. August 2021 01:15
>> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>> Subject: [PATCH 6/6] qoriq: add
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Stijn Tintel
> Sent: Sonntag, 22. August 2021 01:15
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: [PATCH 6/6] qoriq: add support for WatchGuard Firebox M300
>
> This device
On 22/08/2021 03:06, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>
>
> On 22/08/21 01:15, Stijn Tintel wrote:
>> This device is based on NXP's QorIQ T2081QDS board, with a quad-core
>> dual-threaded 1.5 GHz ppc64 CPU and 4GB ECC RAM. The board has 5
>
> A few questions about this device hardware:
> is there anything in
Hi, Alberto,
On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 at 01:07, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>
> Do you think adding the Watchguard M200 would be mostly a copy-paste
> job? from what I have seen online it should be more or less the same
> board but with a lower end CPU.
> I might get one in the near future to do this myself
On 22/08/21 01:15, Stijn Tintel wrote:
This device is based on NXP's QorIQ T2081QDS board, with a quad-core
dual-threaded 1.5 GHz ppc64 CPU and 4GB ECC RAM. The board has 5
A few questions about this device hardware:
is there anything in uboot or Linux that shows or even hints at the fact
11 matches
Mail list logo
