Op wo, 11 jul 2018 om 10:31 , schreef Koen Vandeputte
:
On 2018-07-11 10:11, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
>
> Really not convinced I agree with the "patch 335 removes the whole
code block where that one line changed in upstream”. Did a refresh
myself, several times, and patch 335 is a
On 12/07/18 04:36, Luis Araneda wrote:
From: Christian Schoenebeck
Override the default shutdown action (stop) and close all processes
of dropbear
Since commit 498fe85, the stop action only closes the process
that's listening for new connections, maintaining the ones with
existing clients.
On 06/07/18 14:13, Florian Eckert wrote:
If a "+" is in the version string of a kernel package then the package could
not get installed by opkg with ftp. Because the file could not get found.
"kmod-wireguard_4.4.135%2b0.0.20180519-1_mips_24kc.ipk: No such file or
directory"
The problem is
Hi Etienne Champetier,
You are right.
CentOS 7 is ok, but CentOS 6 fail.
on CentOS 7
$ sh -c 'time --version'
GNU time 1.7
but on CentOS 6
$ sh -c 'time --version'
sh: --version: command not found
real0m0.001s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
Thanks!
2018-07-11 3:38 GMT+08:00 Etienne
On 2018-07-12 10:27, David Johnson wrote:
It seems its quite hard to find a board that is fully supported by
openwrt that has 2x mini pci-express, 2x ethernet ports (WAN, LAN), >
64M flash
I want to plug in ath10k supported 802.11ac mini pci-e radios
Any thoughts suggestions
Thanks
David
From: Alin Nastac
RFC 6092 recommends in section 3.3.1 that an IPv6 CPE must respond to
unsolicited inbound SYNs with an ICMPv6 Destination Unreachable error
code 1 (Communication with destination administratively prohibited).
Signed-off-by: Alin Nastac
---
defaults.c | 34
Am 12.07.2018 um 10:27 schrieb David Johnson:
> It seems its quite hard to find a board that is fully supported by
> openwrt that has 2x mini pci-express, 2x ethernet ports (WAN, LAN), >
> 64M flash
>
> I want to plug in ath10k supported 802.11ac mini pci-e radios
>
> Any thoughts suggestions
>
>
The last patch I saw was from gui in Jan 2017 but I haven't seen this
patch added to the latest openwrt code
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2017-January/005212.html
It appeared that there were issues with the Ethernet ports and the
Nand flash - any progress on those issues -
On 12/07/2018 16:27, David Johnson wrote:
It seems its quite hard to find a board that is fully supported by
openwrt that has 2x mini pci-express, 2x ethernet ports (WAN, LAN), >
64M flash
I want to plug in ath10k supported 802.11ac mini pci-e radios
Any thoughts suggestions
Thanks
David
It seems its quite hard to find a board that is fully supported by
openwrt that has 2x mini pci-express, 2x ethernet ports (WAN, LAN), >
64M flash
I want to plug in ath10k supported 802.11ac mini pci-e radios
Any thoughts suggestions
Thanks
David
___
Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens
---
package/network/utils/iperf/Makefile | 6 +++-
.../patches/0001-fix-non-ipv6-builds.patch| 36 +++
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644
Thanks all for the quick response
Turns out I can do with one PCIe if the board has built in WiFi and I
need power and form factor to be pretty low. So I'm going with
COMPEX WP J563
http://shop.compex.com.sg/wpj563.html
Looks pretty good for $70 and openwrt supported hardware table shows
that
Hi John,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:49 AM John Crispin wrote:
> does this break sysupgrade when run via ssh ?
No, it works as expected, as sysupgrade is done in stages now.
I just tested with an Asus RT-AC58U connected with a serial console
and an SSH connection.
The sysupgrade was done though
You will soon also count with the LibreRouter:
http://librerouter.org/
On 2018-07-12 09:31 AM, David Johnson wrote:
> Thanks all for the quick response
>
> Turns out I can do with one PCIe if the board has built in WiFi and I
> need power and form factor to be pretty low. So I'm going with
>
>
David Johnson wrote:
> It seems its quite hard to find a board that is fully supported by
> openwrt that has 2x mini pci-express, 2x ethernet ports (WAN, LAN), >
> 64M flash
The Turris Omnia has three mini pci-express. Two have radios already in them,
and
the third is open. I have
18.05.2018 17:25, Lev:
No empty commit message please. Explain what you are doing and why you
are doing it. If necessary, explain why you are doing it this way.
Can anything else than NAND flash have bad blocks? If no, are we still
using jffs2 on top of NAND anywhere.
---
On 12/07/18 18:18, Luis Araneda wrote:
Hi John,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:49 AM John Crispin wrote:
does this break sysupgrade when run via ssh ?
No, it works as expected, as sysupgrade is done in stages now.
I just tested with an Asus RT-AC58U connected with a serial console
and an SSH
Move common variables and/or values to the package (variant) default.
Add additional values in variant packages if necessary. Remove further
duplicates by introducing new templates.
Remove the ANY_[HOSTAPD|SUPPLICANT_PROVIDERS]_PROVIDERS. The are the
same as the variables without the any prefix.
Add each variant to the matching PROVIDERS variables after evaluating
the respective hostapd*, wpad* and wpa* variant.
Each package providing the same feature will automatically conflict with
all prior packages providing the same feature.
This way we can handle the conflicts automatically
Due to the use of dependencies to express conflicts, a package which
conflicts with multiple other packages (variants) is indented one level
for each conflict:
< > pkg-variant-a
< > pkg-variant-b (conflicts pkg-variant-a)
< > pkg-variant-c (conflicts pkg-variant-a && pkg-variant-b)
Express
20 matches
Mail list logo
