[OpenWrt-Devel] Generic Gpio Support Status

2008-05-23 Thread Mark Kelly
what is the status of the new generic gpio support? In the current trunk build, I am not seeing the /dev/gpio node being built when the settings are enabled at least not on IXP4XX (Avila gw2345). I know this was working in my 2.6.23 builds, but I'm unsure if I've missed a setting in the new

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] IPv6 Routing und Tunneling Patch

2008-05-23 Thread Alina Friedrichsen
This Makefile patch adds support for the Privacy Extensions, IP-in-IPv6 tunnel, Multiple Routing Tables and source address based routing in the 2.6 Kernel. Signed-off-by: Alina Friedrichsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Index: package/kernel/modules/network.mk

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Git repository for Linux kernel mainline merges

2008-05-23 Thread Axel Gembe
Gregers Petersen wrote: My comment was also a way towards: Ok if this should be done, then it needs to be done in an unconfusing manner - with a bit of thought and planning towards how such a git repository is to be integrated into what is already there ;-) I totally agree, using git

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Git repository for Linux kernel mainline merges

2008-05-23 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hey Imre, Le Friday 23 May 2008 16:13:59 Imre Kaloz, vous avez écrit : I share Gregers' view, too.. Also, one central git is a chaotic mess for this, every target would need it's own branch.. Think ddwrt's repo :P John and I had a short discussion about that on irc. Basically, the idea behind

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Generic Gpio Support Status

2008-05-23 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hi Mark, There are quite some targets which implement either a GPIO lib or Generic GPIO compatible API. You can enable the GPIO device driver for these targets, even though it is not done automatically. Le Friday 23 May 2008 16:43:49 Mark Kelly, vous avez écrit : what is the status of the new

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Git repository for Linux kernel mainline merges

2008-05-23 Thread Felix Fietkau
Axel Gembe wrote: Imre Kaloz wrote: I share Gregers' view, too.. Also, one central git is a chaotic mess for this, every target would need it's own branch.. Think ddwrt's repo :P I dunno how the current situation differs because every target effectively *IS* a branch from the generic