Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Let's fix the OpenWrt patch acceptance problem!

2012-01-24 Thread Dave Taht
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote: As you've probably noticed, we've had issues keeping up with the workload of incoming patches. There is quite a bit of work involved in taking care of incoming patches, not just review. Patches need to be compile tested,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] New package dstat

2012-01-24 Thread Roberto Riggio
No, it is the same version. The version from the 20th wasn't in my outgoing mail box, so i thought that it was not sent. Sorry for the confusion. R. On 23/01/2012 19:13, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, is there any difference to the version from

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ltq_dsl_app support for taking pppoa link up and down

2012-01-24 Thread John Crispin
this patch is folded into the other dsl framework patch. thnaks for testing, ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2] Initial DSL framework for Lantiq

2012-01-24 Thread John Crispin
applied in r29881 thanks ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] sysupgrade for ESR-9753

2012-01-24 Thread Gabor Juhos
2012.01.15. 12:00 keltezéssel, Artur Wronowski írta: This patch add sysupgrade for Engenius ESR-9753 Signed-off-by: Artur Wronowski art...@gmail.com Applied. Thanks, Gabor ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ramips scripts updates

2012-01-24 Thread Gabor Juhos
2012.01.23. 1:29 keltezéssel, Roman Yeryomin írta: In this patch: * rename Argus leds to avoid underscores * rename Belkin F5D8235 v1 leds from f5d8234 to f5d8235 * remove Belkin F5D8235 v1 status led defined as storage led (it was defined as usb led earlier, just in wrong place) - it

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/4] ALL0256N: add entry to machtype.h, Kconfig, Makefile and config-2.6.39

2012-01-24 Thread Gabor Juhos
2012.01.23. 21:00 keltezéssel, Daniel Golle írta: ALL0256N: add entires in machtype.h, Makefile, Kconfig and enable board in config-2.3.39 Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle dgo...@allnet.de Applied. Thanks, Gabor ___ openwrt-devel mailing list

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/4] ALL0256N: board setup code

2012-01-24 Thread Gabor Juhos
2012.01.23. 21:02 keltezéssel, Daniel Golle írta: Add mach-all0256n.c doing the board-setup. Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle dgo...@allnet.de Folded into the 1/4 patch to avoid a build error. Thanks, Gabor ___ openwrt-devel mailing list

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 4/4] ALL0256N: image/Makefile

2012-01-24 Thread Gabor Juhos
2012.01.23. 21:05 keltezéssel, Daniel Golle írta: Generate sysupgrade image for the ALL0256N. Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle dgo...@allnet.de Applied. Thanks, Gabor ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/4] ALL0256N: user-space support

2012-01-24 Thread Gabor Juhos
2012.01.23. 21:03 keltezéssel, Daniel Golle írta: This adds uci-defaults and sysupgrade support for the ALL0256N. Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle dgo...@allnet.de Applied. Thanks, Gabor ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Let's fix the OpenWrt patch acceptance problem!

2012-01-24 Thread Jonathan McCrohan
On 24/01/12 08:22, Dave Taht wrote: My principal critique of this workflow is that I tend to view svn as part of the problem to a large extent. If I do a patch in my own (git) tree to test with, I invariably have to rebase that tree when it comes down from svn. as I am frequently offline,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] collectd-mod-iwinfo

2012-01-24 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hey. I cannot get collectd-mod-iwinfo to work for the proprietary wl0 drivers. They work fine on ath5k and ath9k. Make sure iwinfo was compiled with wl support (wl must be enabled at build time of libiwinfo to get enabled as backend). Before I try further, does collectd-mod-iwinfo support

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] iwinfo hardware_name

2012-01-24 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
The current code is supposed to infer the model from the PCI IDs of the radio, apparently this is not possible and as I have no access to such a model I cannot fix it either - I assumed ath5k exposes it the same way madwifi does but apparently not. ~ Jow

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Let's fix the OpenWrt patch acceptance problem!

2012-01-24 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-01-24 08:06 AM, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: I also see svn as part of the problem. I think a move towards the linux-kernel development model would be a great benefit. I hate sending simple me too posts, but to help demonstrate that there is demand for this, I too would welcome a move to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Let's fix the OpenWrt patch acceptance problem!

2012-01-24 Thread Emmanuel Deloget
Le 01/24/2012 02:06 PM, Jonathan McCrohan a écrit : On 24/01/12 08:22, Dave Taht wrote: My principal critique of this workflow is that I tend to view svn as part of the problem to a large extent. If I do a patch in my own (git) tree to test with, I invariably have to rebase that tree when it

[OpenWrt-Devel] Synopsys DWC OTG USB, round 4

2012-01-24 Thread Nikolai Zhubr
Hello people, I'd like to hear some advice before I waste yet more time on this. Because my knowledge of USB concepts is close to nonexistent, I'll just present the situation as I see it currently with just all details I have. As I understand it, the problem with this thing in device mode is

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Let's fix the OpenWrt patch acceptance problem!

2012-01-24 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2012-01-24 3:57 PM, Brian J. Murrell wrote: On 12-01-24 08:06 AM, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: I also see svn as part of the problem. I think a move towards the linux-kernel development model would be a great benefit. I hate sending simple me too posts, but to help demonstrate that there

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Let's fix the OpenWrt patch acceptance problem!

2012-01-24 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 16:16, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote: Probably not going to happen for the main repo. Some developers like to stay with SVN. Right now I don't see a point in pushing for a complete switch to git, since the svn-git integration is working just fine. While git-svn

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Let's fix the OpenWrt patch acceptance problem!

2012-01-24 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2012-01-24 4:29 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 16:16, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote: Probably not going to happen for the main repo. Some developers like to stay with SVN. Right now I don't see a point in pushing for a complete switch to git, since the svn-git

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designware USB OTG driver upstream questions

2012-01-24 Thread Nikolai Zhubr
Hi, 24.01.2012 19:12, Loh Tien Hock: Hi Nikolai. I tried the patch with g_serial. it needed some fix I have in my company's repository for slave mode. Dma mode works correctly. Wow, this puzzles me somewhat. I'll definitely try to test it and report back. Thank you. Nikolai [trim]

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Synopsys DWC OTG USB, round 4

2012-01-24 Thread Nikolai Zhubr
Hello Alan, 24.01.2012 19:45, Alan Stern: [trim] Does this mean that the hardware has only one FIFO? Or only one for each direction? That's a pretty limited design. Well EPs do have separate FIFOs, at least that's how the driver see it, but it looks like they are somehow not fully

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2] ar71xx: TL-MR3020: fix GPIO polarity for button and switch

2012-01-24 Thread Christian Cier-Zniewski
This patch fixes the GPIO polarity for the button and the sliding switch. The buttons are not active low. Pressed and Released events are wrong without the patch. Signed-off-by: Christian Cier-Zniewski c.c...@gmx.de Index: target/linux/ar71xx/files-2.6.39/arch/mips/ar71xx/mach-tl-mr3020.c

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Let's fix the OpenWrt patch acceptance problem!

2012-01-24 Thread Michael Heimpold
Hi, In my opinion, the main issue is not that we don't give out SVN access fast enough, from my personal experience I can say that I got SVN access very quickly after I offered taking over maintainership for php5 package. After some months I suggested to split php into multiple packages (for

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Let's fix the OpenWrt patch acceptance problem!

2012-01-24 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hello, On Tuesday 24 January 2012 21:14:23 Michael Heimpold wrote: Hi, In my opinion, the main issue is not that we don't give out SVN access fast enough, from my personal experience I can say that I got SVN access very quickly after I offered taking over maintainership for php5

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Let's fix the OpenWrt patch acceptance problem!

2012-01-24 Thread Florian Fainelli
On Tuesday 24 January 2012 15:59:18 Emmanuel Deloget wrote: Le 01/24/2012 02:06 PM, Jonathan McCrohan a écrit : On 24/01/12 08:22, Dave Taht wrote: My principal critique of this workflow is that I tend to view svn as part of the problem to a large extent. If I do a patch in my own (git)

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add support for Sitecom WL-341v3 and other Sercomm IP1006RRv2 boards

2012-01-24 Thread Marco Antonio Mauro
This patch adds support for the Sitecom WL-341 v3 and other Sercomm IP1006RRv2 based boards for sysupgrade support and for the initial flash through pushbutton initiated recovery mode with the special partition table and fixes for the quirks and things required by the modified bootloader. There

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add support for Sitecom WL-341v3 and other Sercomm IP1006RRv2 boards -- third attempt

2012-01-24 Thread Marco Antonio Mauro
This patch adds support for the Sitecom WL-341 v3 and other Sercomm IP1006RRv2 based boards for sysupgrade support and for the initial flash through pushbutton initiated recovery mode with the special partition table and fixes for the quirks and things required by the modified bootloader. There

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] collectd-mod-iwinfo

2012-01-24 Thread Hanno Schupp
Thanks Jow, I had a look at /trunk/package/iwinfo/Makefile and the IWINFO_BACKENDS section seems to define wl driver as required target if a Broadcom kernel module is loaded. I do not understand Makefile at all, so I do not understand what else needs to be done to 'wl must be enabled at build

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] collectd-mod-iwinfo

2012-01-24 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So if you install the iwinfo cli frontend and run iwinfo wl0 info, does it output anything useful, does it identify the hw as type wl ? Is LoadPlugin iwinfo in the enerated collectd.conf ? Is killall -9 collectd; collectd -f reporting any errors ?

[OpenWrt-Devel] Qdisc

2012-01-24 Thread scolfield
Hi, I'm not family with queue disciplines in the Linux kernel. My doubt is, if the switch/router with Linux has exactly two ports to use for input and output, so consider the following ASCII picture: ___

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Let's fix the OpenWrt patch acceptance problem!

2012-01-24 Thread Philip Prindeville
On 1/24/12 6:06 AM, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: I also see svn as part of the problem. I think a move towards the linux-kernel development model would be a great benefit. Using git would allow users to make many small fixes in their own tree and send single a pull request for fixes to x,y and z

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] collectd-mod-iwinfo

2012-01-24 Thread Hanno Schupp
Hi jow, Thanks for following up. Here the outputs: root@Router00177962:/tmp# iwinfo wl0 info wl0 ESSID: Chillifire Hotspot Access Point: 00:1D:7E:E7:96:D4 Type: wl HW Mode(s): 802.11bg Mode: Master Channel: 3 (2.422 GHz) Tx-Power: 24 dBm Link

[OpenWrt-Devel] Compiling WNDR3700 with 3.2 kernel?

2012-01-24 Thread Andrew Silverman
I'm sure this is obvious to most, but not to me- I'd like to try out the new trunk builds with the 3.2 kernel, but it's not clear to me how to configure the build to start using that version even though I've grabbed the recent svn updates- it continues to build the 2.6.39.4 kernel. Any quick

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Compiling WNDR3700 with 3.2 kernel?

2012-01-24 Thread Gabor Juhos
2012.01.25. 8:19 keltezéssel, Andrew Silverman írta: I'm sure this is obvious to most, but not to me- I'd like to try out the new trunk builds with the 3.2 kernel, but it's not clear to me how to configure the build to start using that version even though I've grabbed the recent svn updates-

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2] ar71xx: TL-MR3020: fix GPIO polarity for button and switch

2012-01-24 Thread Gabor Juhos
2012.01.24. 19:31 keltezéssel, Christian Cier-Zniewski írta: This patch fixes the GPIO polarity for the button and the sliding switch. The buttons are not active low. Pressed and Released events are wrong without the patch. Signed-off-by: Christian Cier-Zniewski c.c...@gmx.de Applied.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/2] ar71xx: TL-MR3020: fix board detection, fix missing mandatory package and modify LED behaviour

2012-01-24 Thread Gabor Juhos
2012.01.24. 19:41 keltezéssel, Christian Cier-Zniewski írta: This patch fixes the board detection of the TL-MR3020. The string *TL-MR3020 was searched which is wrong. Now the correct string *TL-MR3020 v1 is searched for. The board name has also been modified from tl-mr3020 to tl-mr3020-v1 to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2] mac80211: enable support for RaLink Rt53xx USB devices in rt2800usb

2012-01-24 Thread Gabor Juhos
2011.12.25. 17:16 keltezéssel, Daniel Golle írta: Hi! On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 03:01:34PM +0100, Daniel Golle wrote: The driver works quite nice and stable for me using a RaLink Rt5370 USB device. Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle dgo...@allnet.de Index: package/mac80211/Makefile