On 2/27/19 7:38 AM, Hans Dedecker wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:46 AM Hans Dedecker wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 7:06 AM Eric Luehrsen wrote:
Recent (20190207) changes to odhcpd makee it dependent on OpenWrt
logical interfaces. Boot time race conditions may make odhcpd binding
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 3:31 PM Christian Lamparter wrote:
>
> On Thursday, February 28, 2019 7:52:06 PM CET Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > Dmitry’s patch
> >
> >
> >
> > [OpenWrt-Devel] ath79: speed up ath9k-eeprom extraction
> >
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1046790/
On Thursday, February 28, 2019 7:52:06 PM CET Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Dmitry’s patch
>
>
>
> [OpenWrt-Devel] ath79: speed up ath9k-eeprom extraction
>
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1046790/
>
>
>
> got marked “Superseded” together with my old stuff.
>
>
>
>
On 2/28/19 3:39 AM, Andreas Ziegler wrote:
Jeff Kletsky schrieb am 25.02.19 um 02:22:
On 2/24/19 4:21 PM, Andreas Ziegler wrote:
Hi Jeff,
thanks for your suggested change!
Although i agree with your change regarding USB GPIO, i don't with the
other part.
Using stock/vendor firmware, GPIO 12
ieee80211w support is only activated in hostapd when at least one
capable driver is build into the image. Many drivers which are capable
of ieee80211 (MFP) and have the MFP_CAPABLE set in the driver are still
missing the DRIVER_11W_SUPPORT dependency. Add this to more driver
capable of ieee80211w.
Hello,
I've uploaded a new set of wave-1 and wave-2 ath10k-ct firmware. Recent
release notes
for wave-1:
* Feb 14, 2019: Remove logic that causes assert when swba logic is not
initialized.
This was seen when trying to bring up 6 VAP vdevs. A similar fix went
into wave-2
Hi,
Dmitry’s patch
[OpenWrt-Devel] ath79: speed up ath9k-eeprom extraction
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1046790/
got marked “Superseded” together with my old stuff.
However, my latest patchset is supposed to be _on top_ of this patch, not to
supersede it (_my_ own old
Fix wrong indentation introduced in 59c2f8a.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler
---
target/linux/ath79/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/ath79/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:59 AM Koen Vandeputte
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 27.02.19 08:13, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > >>
> > > What I mean is just a p2p link running in AP-STA mode, I guess there is no
> > > difference for users. Am I missing something?
> > >
>
> The design of the out-of-box
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:59 AM Koen Vandeputte
wrote:
>
>
> On 27.02.19 08:13, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> >>
> > What I mean is just a p2p link running in AP-STA mode, I guess there is no
> > difference for users. Am I missing something?
> >
The design of the out-of-box firmware for AREDN,
add definition of LAN LED to board.d/01_leds
rename WiFi LED with correct color red
rename status LED with correct color green
(like they are used in stock firmware)
Signed-off-by: Andreas Ziegler
---
target/linux/ath79/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds| 4
On 27.02.19 08:13, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
What I mean is just a p2p link running in AP-STA mode, I guess there is no
difference for users. Am I missing something?
Is dynack going to receive the late acks if I manage to run
wpa_supplicant (wpad-mini?) in plaintext or key_mgmt=NONE mode?
12 matches
Mail list logo