Hi,
Answer below.
W dniu 2021-08-22 o 21:29, Mike Bernardo pisze:
Hi All,
Thanks Jan-Niklas for working on this! I am trying to test this on my onion
omega2+ (in the arduino dock) .. consoled in via a TTL serial adapter and I
tried doing a forced sysupgrade to
Hi All,
Thanks Jan-Niklas for working on this! I am trying to test this on my onion
omega2+ (in the arduino dock) .. consoled in via a TTL serial adapter and I
tried doing a forced sysupgrade to
openwrt-ath79-generic-onion_omega-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin which I built by
applying the patch to
On 22/08/21 14:51, Stijn Tintel wrote:
On 22/08/2021 14:35, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
+
+ port@5 {
+ status = "disabled";
+
+ reg = "<5>";
+ label = "cpu1";
+
On 22/08/21 13:06, Stijn Tintel wrote:
The T1042 CPU in the M200 is e5500, as opposed to the e6500 in the M300.
As Rui already explained, the T1042 does not support AltiVec, which musl
expects for all PPC64 CPUs. I was able to boot Linux on it after
patching the vector instructions out of the
This adds uci support to configure connmark based DNS filtering.
Signed-off-by: Etan Kissling
(imported from upstream mailing list
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2021q2/015151.html)
Signed-off-by: Etan Kissling
---
v2: Bundle with patch to update dnsmasq.
v8: Update
Need this version to add config option for connmark DNS filtering.
Summary of upstream CHANGELOG:
* Handle DHCPREBIND requests in the DHCPv6 server code.
* Fix bug which caused dnsmasq to lose track of processes forked.
* Major rewrite of the DNS server and domain handling code.
* Revise resource
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Branch: refs/heads/master
On 22/08/2021 17:35, Stijn Tintel wrote:
> On 22/08/2021 16:07, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> On 8/22/21 1:15 AM, Stijn Tintel wrote:
>>> Add a new target named "qoriq", that will support boards using PowerPC
>>> processors from NXP's QorIQ brand.
>>>
>>> This doesn't actually add support for any board
Hello. (This is my new email address that I use from now on. I'm also
testing a new mail client, sorry if my reply is unintentionally garbled.)
On 22/08/2021 17:11, Rich Brown wrote:
All,
On Aug 10, 2021, at 1:10 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
... For 21.02 we should work on the DSA
On 22/08/2021 16:07, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 8/22/21 1:15 AM, Stijn Tintel wrote:
>> Add a new target named "qoriq", that will support boards using PowerPC
>> processors from NXP's QorIQ brand.
>>
>> This doesn't actually add support for any board yet, so that
>> installation instructions can
All,
> On Aug 10, 2021, at 1:10 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>
> ... For 21.02 we should work on the DSA documentation which Rafal and Rich
> already did and continue like it is now...
Maybe I'm worrying needlessly, but I want to say I'm concerned about those DSA
pages on the wiki.
They may
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Rafal Milecki
> Sent: Freitag, 6. August 2021 13:00
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: Rafał Miłecki
> Subject: [PATCH] firmware-utils: seama.h replace LGPL-2.1-or-later
Based on the existing documentation [1][2], I dare anyone to demonstrate that
we need to fine-tune these RCU parameters. The (performance) breakage potential
for doing so is immense, so let's just please put down this loaded footgun.
Disable CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT and its dependent symbols.
CONFIG_RCU_{NEED_SEGCBLIST,STALL_COMMON} are set basically everywhere. Move them
to the generic kconfigs. And resort the generic kconfigs while at it.
Signed-off-by: Rui Salvaterra
---
v2: add back CONFIG_VIDEO_IRS1125, which fell off for some unfathomable reason.
Hi,
> --- a/config/Config-images.in
> +++ b/config/Config-images.in
> @@ -303,4 +303,10 @@ menu "Target Images"
> it will be mounted by PARTUUID which makes the kernel
> find the
> appropriate disk automatically.
>
> + config TARGET_ROOTFS_PERSIST_VAR
> +
Hi, Hauke,
On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 at 14:32, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>
> > -# CONFIG_VIDEO_IRS1125 is not set
>
> Why is this only removed?
I'd love to have an answer to that question. I think the resorting got
messed up (after reinserting the symbol and resorting, everything is
fine, so I probably
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of eveans2...@gmail.com
> Sent: Dienstag, 3. August 2021 05:36
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: Ian Chang
> Subject: [PATCH v6 3/3] mvebu: backport CN9130 dts files changes to
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of eveans2...@gmail.com
> Sent: Dienstag, 3. August 2021 05:36
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: Ian Chang
> Subject: [PATCH v6 1/3] mvebu: add support for iEi
On 8/22/21 3:17 PM, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
Based on the existing documentation [1][2], I dare anyone to demonstrate that
we need to fine-tune these RCU parameters. The (performance) breakage potential
for doing so is immense, so let's just please put down this loaded footgun.
Disable
On 8/22/21 3:17 PM, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
CONFIG_RCU_{NEED_SEGCBLIST,STALL_COMMON} are set basically everywhere. Move them
to the generic kconfigs. And resort the generic kconfigs while at it.
Signed-off-by: Rui Salvaterra
---
target/linux/arc770/config-5.4 | 2 --
> Hi Arınç,
>
> Thanks for working on a swconfig to DSA migration script.
> I would prefer not to delay the final 21.02 release further. We should fix the
> IPv6 flow offload problems and then do the final 21.02 release.
+1
> Such a migration script also needs testing, user will have all sorts
CONFIG_RCU_{NEED_SEGCBLIST,STALL_COMMON} are set basically everywhere. Move them
to the generic kconfigs. And resort the generic kconfigs while at it.
Signed-off-by: Rui Salvaterra
---
target/linux/arc770/config-5.4 | 2 --
target/linux/archs38/config-5.4 | 2 --
Based on the existing documentation [1][2], I dare anyone to demonstrate that
we need to fine-tune these RCU parameters. The (performance) breakage potential
for doing so is immense, so let's just please put down this loaded footgun.
Disable CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT and its dependent symbols.
On 8/22/21 1:15 AM, Stijn Tintel wrote:
Add a new target named "qoriq", that will support boards using PowerPC
processors from NXP's QorIQ brand.
This doesn't actually add support for any board yet, so that
installation instructions can go in the commit message of the commit
that adds actual
Hi, Hauke,
On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 at 13:45, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>
> Both options are hidden anyway, so we can manually change them:
>
> config RCU_STALL_COMMON
> def_bool ( TREE_RCU || PREEMPT_RCU )
> help
>
> config RCU_NEED_SEGCBLIST
> def_bool ( TREE_RCU || PREEMPT_RCU
On 22/08/2021 14:35, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
>> On Behalf Of Stijn Tintel
>> Sent: Sonntag, 22. August 2021 01:15
>> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>> Subject: [PATCH 6/6] qoriq: add
On 8/22/21 2:17 PM, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
Hi, Hauke,
On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 at 10:20, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
There are also some targets which explicitly unset CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT:
[snipped]
This should be removed from the target config file.
Sure thing, I'll clean up the targets and fold
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Jan-Niklas Burfeind
> Sent: Samstag, 14. August 2021 15:55
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: open...@sebastianschaper.net; m...@david-bauer.net; Jan-Niklas
> Burfeind
>
Hi, Hauke,
On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 at 10:20, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>
> There are also some targets which explicitly unset CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT:
[snipped]
> This should be removed from the target config file.
Sure thing, I'll clean up the targets and fold the changes into this patch.
>
On 8/20/21 1:42 PM, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
Enable specific sam9x kernel config flags.
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea
---
target/linux/at91/sam9x/config-default | 182 -
1 file changed, 176 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 8/20/21 1:42 PM, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
Use kernel_menuconfig and save for sam9x kernel config.
Is the result of this command the same? (executed with the sam9x and the
sama5 sub target selected)
make kernel_oldconfig CONFIG_TARGET=subtarget
This would run an oldconfig using the
Hi,
> @@ -112,6 +112,15 @@ define Device/atmel_at91sam9x35ek endef
> TARGET_DEVICES += atmel_at91sam9x35ek
>
> +define Device/microchip_sam9x60ek
Please move device definition block according to alphabetic sorting.
Best
Adrian
> + $(Device/evaluation-dtb)
> + DEVICE_VENDOR := Microchip
>
Hi,
> diff --git a/target/linux/at91/image/sama5.mk
> b/target/linux/at91/image/sama5.mk
> index f8e05aae9343..ae3494332139 100644
> --- a/target/linux/at91/image/sama5.mk
> +++ b/target/linux/at91/image/sama5.mk
> @@ -54,6 +54,17 @@ define Build/at91-sdcard
>rm -f $@.img $@.boot $@-uboot.env
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Stijn Tintel
> Sent: Sonntag, 22. August 2021 01:15
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: [PATCH 6/6] qoriq: add support for WatchGuard Firebox M300
>
> This device
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Stijn Tintel
> Sent: Sonntag, 22. August 2021 01:15
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: [PATCH 3/6] openssl: add ppc64 support
>
> Backport an upstream patch that
On 22/08/2021 03:06, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>
>
> On 22/08/21 01:15, Stijn Tintel wrote:
>> This device is based on NXP's QorIQ T2081QDS board, with a quad-core
>> dual-threaded 1.5 GHz ppc64 CPU and 4GB ECC RAM. The board has 5
>
> A few questions about this device hardware:
> is there anything in
On 8/22/21 10:01 AM, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
Based on the existing documentation [1][2], I dare anyone to demonstrate that
we need to fine-tune these RCU parameters. The (performance) breakage potential
for doing so is immense, so let's just please put down this loaded footgun.
Disable
Hi, Alberto,
On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 at 01:07, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>
> Do you think adding the Watchguard M200 would be mostly a copy-paste
> job? from what I have seen online it should be more or less the same
> board but with a lower end CPU.
> I might get one in the near future to do this myself
Hi, Stijn,
FWIW, the whole series is…
Reviewed-by: Rui Salvaterra
… even though I don't have the hardware for testing it. But being a
new target, the whole thing is self-contained. :)
Cheers,
Rui
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Based on the existing documentation [1][2], I dare anyone to demonstrate that
we need to fine-tune these RCU parameters. The (performance) breakage potential
for doing so is immense, so let's just please put down this loaded footgun.
Disable CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT and dependent symbols.
[1]
40 matches
Mail list logo
