[PATCH 3/7] kernel/tegra: Restore kernel files for v5.15

2024-05-15 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
From: Tomasz Maciej Nowak This is an automatically generated commit which aids following Kernel patch history, as git will see the move and copy as a rename thus defeating the purpose. For the original discussion see: https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2023-October/041673.html

[PATCH 4/7] tegra: 6.6: refresh config and patches

2024-05-15 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
From: Tomasz Maciej Nowak Simple refresh to get rid of any fuzz and drop serial patch. With few bug fixes around tegra serial driver the spurious IRQ didn't appear any more during test. Let's see how long that'll last. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak --- target/linux/tegra/config-6.6

[PATCH 6/7] tegra: enable VDE driver

2024-05-15 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
From: Tomasz Maciej Nowak This drives power domain responsible for clean reboot on at least Tegra 2 devices. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak --- package/kernel/linux/modules/video.mk | 4 ++-- target/linux/tegra/config-6.6 | 20 2 files changed, 22

[PATCH 1/7] tegra: refresh 5.15 config

2024-05-15 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
From: Tomasz Maciej Nowak Reduce diffstat in kernel config on new version introduction. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak --- target/linux/tegra/config-5.15 | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/linux/tegra/config-5.15 b/target/linux/tegra/config-5.15 index

[PATCH] uboot-tegra: bump version to 2024.04

2024-05-15 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
From: Tomasz Maciej Nowak Since swig is mentioned as build dependency and buildbots have it installed we can safely bump version. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak --- package/boot/uboot-tegra/Makefile | 11 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 7/7] tegra: trimslice: adjust LED patch to upstream changes

2024-05-15 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
From: Tomasz Maciej Nowak LED subsystem has undergone changes how the function and color of LEDs should be specified, so use that, while still keeping the old label. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak --- ...enable-front-panel-leds-in-TrimSlice.patch | 28 ++- 1 file changed,

[PATCH 0/7] tegra: kernel 6.6 introduction

2024-05-15 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
From: Tomasz Maciej Nowak Next release skips 6.1 in favour of 6.6, so here it is one for tegra target. This series depends on "tegra: assorted fixes"[1] 1. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openwrt/list/?series=406948 Tomasz Maciej Nowak (7): tegra: refresh 5.15 config kernel/tegra:

[PATCH 5/7] tegra: add testing 6.6 kernel

2024-05-15 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
From: Tomasz Maciej Nowak Preliminary support. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak --- target/linux/tegra/Makefile | 1 + target/linux/tegra/image/Makefile | 9 +++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/linux/tegra/Makefile

[PATCH 2/7] kernel/tegra: Create kernel files for v6.6 (from v5.15)

2024-05-15 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
From: Tomasz Maciej Nowak This is an automatically generated commit. When doing `git bisect`, consider `git bisect --skip`. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak --- target/linux/tegra/{config-5.15 => config-6.6}| 0

[PATCH 2/4] tegra: drop console specifiers from kernel commad line

2024-05-15 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
From: Tomasz Maciej Nowak Because recent changes to procd, last "console" argument was used as primary argument and causing no terminal to be spawned on serial interface. So drop the hardcoded consoles in boot script, since dts has already an alias specified, which lets procd decide where to

[PATCH 3/4] tegra: trimslice: enable GPIO LEDs driver

2024-05-15 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
From: Tomasz Maciej Nowak LEDs are on all the time since boot, until there's driver to claim them. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak --- target/linux/tegra/image/Makefile | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/linux/tegra/image/Makefile

[PATCH 1/4] tegra: pad rootfs to recreate overlay after upgrade

2024-05-15 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
From: Tomasz Maciej Nowak The old overlay remained after upgrades and would cause failure on first boot after upgrade, in which no new overlay could be created while old one was unusable. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak --- target/linux/tegra/image/Makefile | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3

[PATCH 4/4] tegra: trimslice: enable USB HID driver

2024-05-15 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
From: Tomasz Maciej Nowak Without serial or network access the only option for initial configuration, is a attached display with USB keyboard, but the keyboard driver needs to be installed first. So enable keyboard driver by default to avoid this issue. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak ---

[PATCH 0/4] tegra: assorted fixes

2024-05-15 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
From: Tomasz Maciej Nowak Few minor fixes found when perparing 6.6 bump. Tomasz Maciej Nowak (4): tegra: pad rootfs to recreate overlay after upgrade tegra: drop console specifiers from kernel commad line tegra: trimslice: enable GPIO LEDs driver tegra: trimslice: enable USB HID driver

[PATCH v2] gemini: In-flight ethernet patches

2024-05-15 Thread Linus Walleij
These patches have partial acceptance upstream and are still a WIP, now there is merge window for kernel v6.10 so these will not be reposted until that is over. In the meantime, let's add the current state to OpenWrt so the ethernet on Gemini is up and working (tested on several devices).

[PATCH] gemini: In-flight ethernet patches

2024-05-15 Thread Linus Walleij
These patches have partial acceptance upstream and are still a WIP, now there is merge window for kernel v6.10 so these will not be reposted until that is over. In the meantime, let's add the current state to OpenWrt so the ethernet on Gemini is up and working (tested on several devices).

Re: Install LuCI for snapshots builds

2024-05-13 Thread Paul Spooren
Hi, — %< — Well to conclude, it takes more time and there is “always” firmware-selector.openwrt.org, so I’ll just leave it as is. Thanks for your thoughts, Paul ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [RFC PATCH] hostapd: Add support for APuP

2024-05-13 Thread Paul Spooren
Hi Gio, > On 10. May 2024, at 19:48, gio--- via openwrt-devel > wrote: > > The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows > sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. > > To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped >

[sdwalker/sdwalker.github.io] 9b1add: This week's update

2024-05-12 Thread Stephen Walker via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Branch: refs/heads/master

Re: [RFC PATCH] hostapd: Add support for APuP

2024-05-12 Thread Paul D
inline On 2024-05-10 19:48, g...@eigenlab.org wrote: > From: Gioacchino Mazzurco > > Add support for hostapd Access Point Micro Peering > > Signed-off-by: Gioacchino Mazzurco > --- > .../wifi-scripts/files/lib/netifd/hostapd.sh | 16 +- > package/network/services/hostapd/Makefile | 2

Re: measured boot / fTPM and OpenWrt One

2024-05-10 Thread Michael Richardson
Daniel Golle wrote: >> Well, that's certainly true. It is not always possible to talk to the >> outside world from inside that initial boot enclave. That's the detail that >> we need. >> Do we even have a spare GPI(o) pin that can be used for this? >> (It can't be used for

Re: measured boot / fTPM and OpenWrt One

2024-05-10 Thread Daniel Golle
Hi Michael, On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 03:03:27PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Daniel Golle wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 03:04:37PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > >> > >> {sorry for the long delay, been unwell} > >> > >> Bjørn Mork wrote: > >> > Maybe it

measured boot / fTPM and OpenWrt One

2024-05-10 Thread Michael Richardson
Daniel Golle wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 03:04:37PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: >> >> {sorry for the long delay, been unwell} >> >> Bjørn Mork wrote: >> > Maybe it is possible to deploy the system with secure boot and a >> > protected IDevId key by default,

[RFC PATCH] hostapd: Add support for APuP

2024-05-10 Thread gio--- via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- From: Gioacchino Mazzurco Add

[PATCH] ubus: add command to create devices dynamically

2024-05-10 Thread gio--- via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- From: Gioacchino Mazzurco Some

[RFC PATCH 14/14] config: clamp dhcpv6_pd_min_len

2024-05-09 Thread Paul Donald
From: Paul Donald Attempt to be helpful. Signed-off-by: Paul Donald --- src/config.c | 10 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/config.c b/src/config.c index 4d35548..7484519 100644 --- a/src/config.c +++ b/src/config.c @@ -883,11 +883,11 @@ int

[RFC PATCH 11/14] config: clamp ra_retranstime

2024-05-09 Thread Paul Donald
From: Paul Donald Attempt to be helpful. Signed-off-by: Paul Donald --- src/config.c | 9 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/config.c b/src/config.c index e0f2d80..160d7db 100644 --- a/src/config.c +++ b/src/config.c @@ -951,11 +951,10 @@ int

[RFC PATCH 12/14] config: clamp ra_mtu into 1280-65535 range

2024-05-09 Thread Paul Donald
From: Paul Donald (ipv6 packets can be up to 4GB in size...) The old logic had a logic error of || instead of && Signed-off-by: Paul Donald --- src/config.c | 9 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/config.c b/src/config.c index 160d7db..f4eaa3b 100644

[RFC PATCH 00/14] odhcpd config value clamping

2024-05-09 Thread Paul Donald
Clamp values read from config to RFC mandated sane values instead of just complaining. We also now implement valid_lifetime for ULA prefixes. This is useful if you need to sunset or remove one from circulation. ( Interestingly, if you spin up dev devices frequently which spam the network with new

[RFC PATCH 09/14] config: clamp ra_reachabletime to RFC maximum (instead of complaining)

2024-05-09 Thread Paul Donald
From: Paul Donald Attempt to be helpful. Signed-off-by: Paul Donald --- src/config.c | 12 +++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/config.c b/src/config.c index 6b3cb01..54fb9b5 100644 --- a/src/config.c +++ b/src/config.c @@ -939,11 +939,13 @@ int

[RFC PATCH 04/14] router: refactor calc_ra_lifetime, and define ra_lifetime as uint32_t

2024-05-09 Thread Paul Donald
From: Paul Donald ra_lifetime no longer holds negative values, because we no longer do 'init' when we do calc_ra_lifetime. Signed-off-by: Paul Donald --- src/odhcpd.h | 2 +- src/router.c | 19 --- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/odhcpd.h

[RFC PATCH 03/14] config: clamp ra_mininterval, ra_maxinterval, ra_lifetime at load time

2024-05-09 Thread Paul Donald
From: Paul Donald Signed-off-by: Paul Donald --- src/config.c | 48 +--- src/router.c | 10 -- src/router.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/config.c b/src/config.c index 346d74a..2ccf742 100644

[RFC PATCH 08/14] router: clamp prefix valid_lt to interface valid_lifetime

2024-05-09 Thread Paul Donald
From: Paul Donald Before: == ICMPv6 Option (Prefix information : fd26:3c30:a222::/64) Type: Prefix information (3) Length: 4 (32 bytes) Prefix Length: 64 Flag: 0xc0, On-link flag(L), Autonomous address-configuration flag(A) Valid Lifetime: Infinity (4294967295) Preferred

[RFC PATCH 10/14] config: clamp ra_hoplimit to maximum (instead of complaining)

2024-05-09 Thread Paul Donald
From: Paul Donald Attempt to be helpful. Signed-off-by: Paul Donald --- src/config.c | 11 ++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/config.c b/src/config.c index 54fb9b5..e0f2d80 100644 --- a/src/config.c +++ b/src/config.c @@ -961,11 +961,12 @@ int

[RFC PATCH 06/14] config: implement RFC4861 AdvValidLifetime (make configurable)

2024-05-09 Thread Paul Donald
From: Paul Donald In accordance with RFC4861. Enables control of ULA. The new config variable is valid_lifetime. e.g.: config dhcp 'lan' ... option valid_lifetime '6h' Signed-off-by: Paul Donald --- README | 2 ++ src/config.c | 14 ++ src/odhcpd.h | 1 +

[RFC PATCH 02/14] router: Apply updated values from RFC8319 (updates RFC4861) to RA/ND

2024-05-09 Thread Paul Donald
From: Paul Donald https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8319#section-4 Signed-off-by: Paul Donald --- src/router.c | 6 -- src/router.h | 23 ++- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/router.c b/src/router.c index 7f5658b..ae0c545 100644 ---

[RFC PATCH 07/14] config: lease times are all UINT32_MAX; drop double size handling

2024-05-09 Thread Paul Donald
From: Paul Donald This now prevents implicit 64 bit->32 bit truncation which may flag compiler errors later on down the road. All of the variables receiving from parse_leasetime() are uint32_t anyway, so max 136 years of valid lease time will have to suffice :) Signed-off-by: Paul Donald ---

[RFC PATCH 05/14] router: redefine ra_mininterval and ra_maxinterval as uint32_t

2024-05-09 Thread Paul Donald
From: Paul Donald They never store negative values. Signed-off-by: Paul Donald --- src/config.c | 6 +++--- src/odhcpd.h | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/config.c b/src/config.c index 2ccf742..a3bf1ba 100644 --- a/src/config.c +++ b/src/config.c @@

[RFC PATCH 01/14] config: refactor parse_leasetime() - branch amount remains same

2024-05-09 Thread Paul Donald
From: Paul Donald Also make 's' value a noop. Signed-off-by: Paul Donald --- src/config.c | 20 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/config.c b/src/config.c index 62d4857..346d74a 100644 --- a/src/config.c +++ b/src/config.c @@ -356,18

[RFC PATCH 13/14] config: clamp dhcpv6_hostid_len

2024-05-09 Thread Paul Donald
From: Paul Donald Attempt to be helpful. Signed-off-by: Paul Donald --- src/config.c | 11 ++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/config.c b/src/config.c index f4eaa3b..4d35548 100644 --- a/src/config.c +++ b/src/config.c @@ -896,11 +896,12 @@ int

[PATCH 23.05 1/2] mt76: update to Git HEAD (2024-01-18)

2024-05-09 Thread Rafał Miłecki
From: Felix Fietkau 83e3947e2c52 linux-firmware: update firmware for MT7922 WiFi device ddaa8cb6e81a linux-firmware: update firmware for MT7921 WiFi device f83b1601cc10 linux-firmware: update firmware for MT7922 WiFi device 61d334ab0f33 linux-firmware: add firmware for MT7925 a7836e4c8a60 wifi:

[PATCH 23.05 2/2] mt76: update to Git HEAD (2024-02-03)

2024-05-09 Thread Rafał Miłecki
From: Felix Fietkau a9693e1979c2 linux-firmware: add firmware for MT7996 0258dc90e3a1 wifi: mt76: mt7603: fix reading target power from eeprom 3e81173d9e2b wifi: mt76: mt7603: initialize chainmask 786a339bac36 wifi: mt76: mt7996: fix fortify warning bc37a7ebc267 wifi: mt76: mt7996: fix fw

[PATCH 23.05 0/2] mt76: firmwares, minor power fixes, mt7925/mt7996 stability

2024-05-09 Thread Rafał Miłecki
From: Rafał Miłecki Update 23.05 mt76 to the 3 months old version which should we well tested by now. There are minor fixes, updated firmwares and mt7996 out of box support thanks to the included firmware files. Felix Fietkau (2): mt76: update to Git HEAD (2024-01-18) mt76: update to Git

[PATCH] Fix has_better_load evaluation

2024-05-08 Thread Daniel Albers
Fixes two bugs: 1) if condition in is_better_candidate previously always evaluated to false. 2) below_load_threshold actually implemented above_load_threshold Signed-off-by: Daniel Albers --- policy.c | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/policy.c b/policy.c

[usteer] Fix has_better_load evaluation

2024-05-08 Thread Daniel Albers
Fixes two bugs: 1) if condition in is_better_candidate previously always evaluated to false. 2) below_load_threshold actually implemented above_load_threshold Fixes #5 --- policy.c | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/policy.c b/policy.c index

Re: Install LuCI for snapshots builds

2024-05-08 Thread Thibaut
Hi, > Le 8 mai 2024 à 09:30, Jo-Philipp Wich a écrit : > > Hi, > >> [...] >> Let me explain why: >> Currently the snapshot builders are only building **target-specific** >> packages as well as packages included in the image by default. (We call >> that "phase1"). That means that a single build

Re: Install LuCI for snapshots builds

2024-05-08 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi, [...] Let me explain why: Currently the snapshot builders are only building **target-specific** packages as well as packages included in the image by default. (We call that "phase1"). That means that a single build takes around 2~3 hours, depending on the target and the machine carrying out

Re: Install LuCI for snapshots builds

2024-05-08 Thread Robert Marko
On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 03:32, Rich Brown wrote: > > Daniel, > > I find your comment persuasive. I was not aware of the cost of including LuCI > In the nightly builds. I withdraw my "+1" for including LuCI. > > On May 7, 2024, at 8:38 PM, Daniel Golle wrote: > > ...That means that a single build

Re: Install LuCI for snapshots builds

2024-05-07 Thread Daniel Golle
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 11:52:02PM +0200, Robert Marko wrote: > On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 23:25, Paul Spooren wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > For some reason (resource usage?) our snapshot builds do not include the > > LuCI web interface. I think it’s an advantage to have LuCI installed in > >

Re: Issues w/ kexec-tools when building images

2024-05-07 Thread Philip Prindeville via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Actually, I *am* selecting kexec

Re: Issues w/ kexec-tools when building images

2024-05-07 Thread Enéas Ulir de Queiroz
I’m nowhere close to being able to even check this, but I will give you a pointer. This usually happens when some Makefile defines multiple packages, one of them depending on kexec-tools (or any package define in its Makefile), and another one—which you are selecting—that doesn’t. The build

Re: Issues w/ kexec-tools when building images (redux)

2024-05-07 Thread Christian Marangi (Ansuel)
Il giorno mer 8 mag 2024 alle ore 00:03 Philip Prindeville via openwrt-devel ha scritto: > > The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows > sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. > > To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped

Issues w/ kexec-tools when building images (redux)

2024-05-07 Thread Philip Prindeville via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hi, Sorry, had to add filters to

Re: Install LuCI for snapshots builds

2024-05-07 Thread Robert Marko
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 23:25, Paul Spooren wrote: > > Hi all, > > For some reason (resource usage?) our snapshot builds do not include the LuCI > web interface. I think it’s an advantage to have LuCI installed in snapshot > images since a) it installed for all releases anyway and b) often it’s

Re: Install LuCI for snapshots builds

2024-05-07 Thread Rich Brown
+1 - I endorse installing LuCI in snapshot builds. - A significant fraction of people will wind up installing LuCI anyway. - It's a FAQ on the forum. "I just installed a snapshot build, but there's no web GUI." (This even bites me from time to time...) - LuCI poses less of a space concern (in

Issues w/ kexec-tools when building images

2024-05-07 Thread Philip Prindeville via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hi, I fetched/rebased recently

Re: Install LuCI for snapshots builds

2024-05-07 Thread Christian Marangi
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 11:24:32PM +0200, Paul Spooren wrote: > Hi all, > > For some reason (resource usage?) our snapshot builds do not include the LuCI > web interface. I think it’s an advantage to have LuCI installed in snapshot > images since a) it installed for all releases anyway and b)

Install LuCI for snapshots builds

2024-05-07 Thread Paul Spooren
Hi all, For some reason (resource usage?) our snapshot builds do not include the LuCI web interface. I think it’s an advantage to have LuCI installed in snapshot images since a) it installed for all releases anyway and b) often it’s just nice to have the web interface directly available. Is

Re: [PATCH] ipq40xx: add PCIe magic hack to improve VRX518 compatibility

2024-05-07 Thread Christian Marangi (Ansuel)
Il giorno mar 7 mag 2024 alle ore 18:53 Enrico Mioso ha scritto: > > Hello all!! > > is there any chance we can merge any form of this patch? > The device it is related seems pretty popular and one of the rare devices > supporting VDSL, 35B profile and with nice specs. > Even tough I can

Re: Re: [PATCH] ramips: mt7621: add support for Keenetic Viva (KN-1910)

2024-05-07 Thread wornandrew via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- > I count 15 partitions in your

Re: [PATCH] ipq40xx: add PCIe magic hack to improve VRX518 compatibility

2024-05-07 Thread Enrico Mioso
Hello all!! is there any chance we can merge any form of this patch? The device it is related seems pretty popular and one of the rare devices supporting VDSL, 35B profile and with nice specs. Even tough I can understand it is not desirable to maintain this patch indefinitely should that be the

Re: [PATCH 2/2] realtek: add RTL821X_CHIP_ID

2024-05-07 Thread Jonas Gorski
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 12:16, Bjørn Mork wrote: > > Stijn Tintel writes: > > > On 27/04/2024 11:16, Bjørn Mork wrote: > >> st...@linux-ipv6.be writes: > >> > >>> phy_write_paged(phydev, 31, 27, 0x0002); > >>> val = phy_read_paged(phydev, 31, 28); > >> .. > >>> phy_write_paged(phydev,

Re: [PATCH] ramips: mt7621: add support for Keenetic Viva (KN-1910)

2024-05-07 Thread Felix Baumann via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- I count 15 partitions in your dts

[PATCH] ramips: mt7621: add support for Keenetic Viva (KN-1910)

2024-05-07 Thread wornandrew via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- From: Andrew Worn SoC :

Re: [PATCH 1/2] realtek/rtl839x: respect phy-is-integrated property

2024-05-07 Thread Andreas Böhler via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hi, On 27/04/2024 00:40,

Re: [PATCH 2/2] realtek: add RTL821X_CHIP_ID

2024-05-07 Thread Bjørn Mork
Stijn Tintel writes: > On 27/04/2024 11:16, Bjørn Mork wrote: >> st...@linux-ipv6.be writes: >> >>> phy_write_paged(phydev, 31, 27, 0x0002); >>> val = phy_read_paged(phydev, 31, 28); >> .. >>> phy_write_paged(phydev, 0x1f, 0x1b, 0x0002); >>> val = phy_read_paged(phydev, 0x1f,

Re: [PATCH 2/2] realtek: add RTL821X_CHIP_ID

2024-05-07 Thread Stijn Tintel
On 27/04/2024 11:16, Bjørn Mork wrote: st...@linux-ipv6.be writes: phy_write_paged(phydev, 31, 27, 0x0002); val = phy_read_paged(phydev, 31, 28); .. phy_write_paged(phydev, 0x1f, 0x1b, 0x0002); val = phy_read_paged(phydev, 0x1f, 0x1c); While you're doing

[PATCH qca-wireless] ipq6018: add BDF for Edgecore EAP101

2024-05-07 Thread stijn
Taken from TIP OpenWiFi: https://github.com/Telecominfraproject/wlan-ap/raw/88d6633c85acd4143cfcb1f0a4fdcfdc88f35f3e/feeds/ipq807x_v5.4/ath11k-wifi/board-edgecore-eap101.bin.IPQ6018 Signed-off-by: Stijn Tintel --- board-edgecore_eap101.ipq6018 | Bin 0 -> 65644 bytes 1 file changed, 0

Issues w/ kexec-tools when building images

2024-05-06 Thread Philip Prindeville via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hi, I fetched/rebased recently

Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] odhcpd patchset

2024-05-06 Thread Paul D
Any further comments or reviews for this to go in? On 2024-04-09 05:04, Paul Donald wrote: > From: Paul Donald > > applies to odhcpd master HEAD d8118f6e76e5519881f9a37137c3a06b3cb60fd2 > > Before: > == > ICMPv6 Option (Prefix information : fd51:1c2a:8909::/64) > Type: Prefix information

[PATCH v2] gemini: Bump to kernel v6.6

2024-05-05 Thread Linus Walleij
The Gemini works fine with kernel v6.6. As per the example for ipq806x, drop support for anything older than v6.6, there is no point in supporting it, and the new DTS SoC directory just makes it hard to maintain. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- ChangeLog v1->v2: - Update all patches for quilt.

[sdwalker/sdwalker.github.io] 30cdb4: This week's update

2024-05-05 Thread Stephen Walker via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Branch: refs/heads/master

Re: Question to recent Qualcomm CVEs

2024-05-03 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Thursday, 2 May 2024 09:25:03 CEST Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:36:47 CEST Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote: > > > It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first but my > > > understanding that there should be

Re: Question to recent Qualcomm CVEs

2024-05-02 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:36:47 CEST Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote: > > It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first but my > > understanding that there should be updates for the newer 2.7.0.1 branch > > as well (2.7.0.1 branch is

[PATCH] gemini: Bump to kernel v6.6

2024-05-02 Thread Linus Walleij
The Gemini works fine with kernel v6.6. As per the example for ipq806x, drop support for anything older than v6.6, there is no point in supporting it, and the new DTS SoC directory just makes it hard to maintain. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- target/linux/gemini/Makefile |

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Base support for Inteno XG6846

2024-05-01 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 8:36 PM Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote: > Looks good to me. > AFAIK you have write access to the repo > (https://openwrt.org/voting/2024-02-new-member-linusw), so feel free > to merge these patches yourself. Yep I have, I'm just scared ;) OK I pushed them now, please check

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Base support for Inteno XG6846

2024-05-01 Thread Álvaro Fernández Rojas
Hi Linus, El jue, 25 abr 2024 a las 22:12, Linus Walleij () escribió: > > These patches have been cooking for some time, let's > get them moving. > > The idea is to merge this base so we have base support > for the target and then try to work out remaining issues > such as the LED handling.

Re: Question to recent Qualcomm CVEs

2024-04-30 Thread Christian Marangi (Ansuel)
Il giorno mar 30 apr 2024 alle ore 15:04 Kalle Valo ha scritto: > > Robert Marko writes: > > > On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 10:48, Kalle Valo wrote: > > > >> > >> Robert Marko writes: > >> > >> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:37, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18

Re: Question to recent Qualcomm CVEs

2024-04-30 Thread Robert Marko
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 15:02, Kalle Valo wrote: > > Robert Marko writes: > > > On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 10:48, Kalle Valo wrote: > > > >> > >> Robert Marko writes: > >> > >> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:37, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo

Re: Question to recent Qualcomm CVEs

2024-04-30 Thread Kalle Valo
Robert Marko writes: > On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 10:48, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> >> Robert Marko writes: >> >> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:37, Sven Eckelmann wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote: >> >> > It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch

Re: OpenWrt One / project update

2024-04-30 Thread Torsten Duwe
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 21:05:15 +0100 Daniel Golle wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 03:04:37PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > > {sorry for the long delay, been unwell} > > > > Bjørn Mork wrote: > > > Maybe it is possible to deploy the system with secure boot > >

Re: Question to recent Qualcomm CVEs

2024-04-30 Thread Robert Marko
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 10:48, Kalle Valo wrote: > > Robert Marko writes: > > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:37, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > >> > >> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote: > >> > It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first but my > >> > understanding that

Re: Question to recent Qualcomm CVEs

2024-04-30 Thread Kalle Valo
Robert Marko writes: > On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:37, Sven Eckelmann wrote: >> >> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote: >> > It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first but my >> > understanding that there should be updates for the newer 2.7.0.1 branch >> > as

Re: OpenWrt One / project update

2024-04-29 Thread David Lang
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Michael Richardson wrote: {sorry for the long delay, been unwell} Bjørn Mork wrote: > Maybe it is possible to deploy the system with secure boot and a > protected IDevId key by default, but allowing the user/owner to erase > the key and disable secure boot? This

Re: OpenWrt One / project update

2024-04-29 Thread Daniel Golle
Hi Michael, On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 03:04:37PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > > {sorry for the long delay, been unwell} > > Bjørn Mork wrote: > > Maybe it is possible to deploy the system with secure boot and a > > protected IDevId key by default, but allowing the user/owner to

Re: OpenWrt One / project update

2024-04-29 Thread Michael Richardson
{sorry for the long delay, been unwell} Bjørn Mork wrote: > Maybe it is possible to deploy the system with secure boot and a > protected IDevId key by default, but allowing the user/owner to erase > the key and disable secure boot? This way all use cases could be > supported,

[PATCH 23.05 0/2] mt76: update for some fixes & important features

2024-04-29 Thread Rafał Miłecki
From: Rafał Miłecki I'd like to slightly update mt76 for 23.05. This update: 1. Is important for MT7996 (important features including WED support) 2. Includes minor fixes for mt7915 & mt7921 Felix Fietkau (2): mt76: update to the latest version mt76: update to Git HEAD (2023-12-08)

[PATCH 23.05 1/2] mt76: update to the latest version

2024-04-29 Thread Rafał Miłecki
From: Felix Fietkau b5d13611d35e mt76: mt7915: fix monitor mode issues bbbac7deee3d wifi: mt76: rename mt76_packet_id_init/flush to mt76_wcid_init/cleanup f1e1e67d97d1 wifi: mt76: fix race condition related to checking tx queue fill status b3f739a64e6b wifi: mt76: mt7996: add eht rx rate

[PATCH 23.05 2/2] mt76: update to Git HEAD (2023-12-08)

2024-04-29 Thread Rafał Miłecki
From: Felix Fietkau 890ae4d717f1 wifi: mt76: mt76x02: fix MT76x0 external LNA gain handling fcc2f3d82bc9 wifi: mt76: fix lock dependency problem for wed_lock 77cc14596202 wifi: mt76: mt792x: move mt7921_skb_add_usb_sdio_hdr in mt792x module bc85355885d1 wifi: mt76: mt792x: move some common usb

Re: Question to recent Qualcomm CVEs

2024-04-29 Thread Robert Marko
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:37, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote: > > It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first but my > > understanding that there should be updates for the newer 2.7.0.1 branch > > as well (2.7.0.1 branch is also in

Re: Question to recent Qualcomm CVEs

2024-04-29 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote: > It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first but my > understanding that there should be updates for the newer 2.7.0.1 branch > as well (2.7.0.1 branch is also in linux-firmware). Yes, I also told them in the support ticket

Re: Question to recent Qualcomm CVEs

2024-04-29 Thread Kalle Valo
Kalle Valo writes: > + ath11k, jeff > > Sven Eckelmann writes: > >> On Monday, 26 February 2024 15:50:44 CET Felix Fietkau wrote: >> [...] The Qualcomm bulletin[1] says "Patches are being actively >>> > shared with OEMs". >>> > >>> > Were these bugfixes made available for OpenWRT? Is

[sdwalker/sdwalker.github.io] f1f5b4: This week's update

2024-04-28 Thread Stephen Walker via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Branch: refs/heads/master

[PATCH 0/2] Add support for ASUS RT-AC3200 and ASUS RT-AC5300

2024-04-28 Thread Arınç ÜNAL via B4 Relay
Hello. This patch series brings support for ASUS RT-AC3200 and ASUS RT-AC5300 on OpenWrt. Note to Rafał, please apply this after backporting the device tree patches for these devices. Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL --- Arınç ÜNAL (2): bcm53xx: add support for ASUS RT-AC3200 and ASUS RT-AC5300

[PATCH 2/2] packages: nvram: add asus,rt-ac{3200,5300} to set_wireless_led_behaviour

2024-04-28 Thread Arınç ÜNAL via B4 Relay
From: Arınç ÜNAL Add ASUS RT-AC3200 and ASUS RT-AC5300 to the set wireless LED behaviour quirk. ASUS RT-AC3200's wireless chip is different than ASUS RT-AC5300's, the environment variables for it are 0:ledbh10 and 1:ledbh10. Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL --- package/utils/nvram/Makefile

[PATCH 1/2] bcm53xx: add support for ASUS RT-AC3200 and ASUS RT-AC5300

2024-04-28 Thread Arınç ÜNAL via B4 Relay
From: Arınç ÜNAL ASUS RT-AC3200 and ASUS RT-AC5300 are AC3200 and AC5300 routers, respectively, featuring 5 Ethernet ports over the integrated Broadcom switch. ASUS RT-AC3200 hardware info: * Processor: Broadcom BCM4709A0 dual-core @ 1.0 GHz * Switch: BCM53012 in BCM4709A0 * DDR3 RAM: 256 MB *

Re: [PATCH 2/2] realtek: add RTL821X_CHIP_ID

2024-04-27 Thread Bjørn Mork
st...@linux-ipv6.be writes: > phy_write_paged(phydev, 31, 27, 0x0002); > val = phy_read_paged(phydev, 31, 28); .. > phy_write_paged(phydev, 0x1f, 0x1b, 0x0002); > val = phy_read_paged(phydev, 0x1f, 0x1c); While you're doing spring cleaning That piece of cut-n-paste

Re: [PATCH 1/2] realtek/rtl839x: respect phy-is-integrated property

2024-04-26 Thread Daniel Golle
Hi Stijn, On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 01:40:07AM +0300, st...@linux-ipv6.be wrote: > Respect the phy-is-integrated property on ethernet-phy nodes. > > There are RTL8393M switches where the PHYs at address 48 and 49 are > provided by an external RTL8214FC. Hardcoding them to use the internal > SerDes

[PATCH 2/2] realtek: add RTL821X_CHIP_ID

2024-04-26 Thread stijn
According to the Realtek SDK code, the RTL8214FC, RTL8218B and RTL8218FB all have the same chip ID 0x6276. Let's add a constant for it, as we're using it in more than one location. Signed-off-by: Stijn Tintel --- .../linux/realtek/files-5.15/drivers/net/phy/rtl83xx-phy.c | 6 -- 1 file

[PATCH 1/2] realtek/rtl839x: respect phy-is-integrated property

2024-04-26 Thread stijn
Respect the phy-is-integrated property on ethernet-phy nodes. There are RTL8393M switches where the PHYs at address 48 and 49 are provided by an external RTL8214FC. Hardcoding them to use the internal SerDes makes it impossible to use the ports connected to such an external PHY. Respect the

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >