Hello,
I am very happy about moving to Github.
Saverio
2016-05-24 16:06 GMT+02:00 Luka Perkov :
> Dear OpenWrt mailing list readers,
>
> as the subject says I'd like to make proposal to move the OpenWrt
> codebase to Git. This was already discussed before [1] and now when
>
;>
>>
>> you seem to have sent the same patch which does not look whitespace
>> broken. i'll use that one instead.
>
>
> My patch is not for CC... it's for trunk which uses the newer rt305x driver.
>
> Cheers,
> Vittorio
>
>
>>
>> John
>&
This patch is also available here:
https://github.com/zioproto/openwrt15051-batman/commit/0281382bcaa139f0d1d3b589797af4c434747f3e
commit 0281382bcaa139f0d1d3b589797af4c434747f3e
Author: Saverio Proto <ziopr...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun May 1 23:14:19 2016 +0200
ramips: Fix IPv6 ne
Who has commit rights on the other tree ? So we can send an email to
have it fixed ?
thank you :)
Saverio
2016-04-05 15:42 GMT+02:00 John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org>:
>
>
> On 05/04/2016 15:33, Saverio Proto wrote:
>> Thanks Bruno,
>>
>> I am sorry I am coming b
you
Saverio
2016-04-04 22:38 GMT+02:00 Bruno Randolf <b...@einfach.org>:
> On 04/04/2016 09:34 PM, Saverio Proto wrote:
>>> Great! Thanks for your good work!
>>> Could you please add a tag for 15.05.1 in the git repo?
>>
>> That would be great. I a
> Great! Thanks for your good work!
> Could you please add a tag for 15.05.1 in the git repo?
That would be great. I am trying to git bisect a bug and I have no
idea on top of what commit is 15.05.1 built.
thank you :)
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel
> I don't have a number off hand, that's still being decided. My feeling has
> been that's it'd be in the tens of thousands USD total. I'll try to get more
> of finalized amount as soon as possible.
Hello Eric,
considering that a Senior Engineer in the SF Bay Area has an average
income of
Wow,
I received your email on so many mailing lists that I could not stop
from answering.
Could you please give some context about what is prplwrt ?
I have been working with OpenWrt since 2006 and it is the first time I
hear about prplwrt.
The website did not help, and all this people are
Hello Bruno,
yet another tool used in Ninux.org:
https://github.com/ninuxorg/misc_tools/tree/master/adsl_check
What you want to implement is a generic tool... that checks a network
condition and if this condition happens triggers an event.
Yes it would be a nice tool. However routing protocols
Have a look at this repo:
https://github.com/libre-mesh/ruci
Small utility for mass backup / restoring of OpenWrt routers configurations.
Saverio
2015-03-21 15:49 GMT+01:00 Janne Cederberg janne.cederb...@gmail.com:
Greetings all!
Been searching around and found for example OpenWISP but
I think the business model of StartSSL and others, is that they give
certificates for free, but you have to pay a lot in case you need to
revoke a certificate.
my 2 cents
Saverio
2015-02-14 19:31 GMT+01:00 Alessandro Di Federico ale+o...@clearmind.me:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:21:41 +0100
I think the one for the NanoStation should work as well:
http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/ar71xx/generic/openwrt-ar71xx-generic-ubnt-nano-m-xw-squashfs-factory.bin
I never tested, but ubnt devices are all similar.
Saverio
2015-02-12 21:27 GMT+01:00 Ken Buska kbu...@gmail.com:
Hello everyone !
Relax :) If we are reading this list it is because we all want a
better OpenWrt, and we all do the best we can for it.
Etienne in my experience the OpenWrt group is really open. The problem
is the that core people have to face thousands of contacts over the
Internet from unknown
Hello John,
there will be no release branch here ?
http://git.openwrt.org/
thanks
Saverio
2014-07-14 11:12 GMT+02:00 John Crispin j...@phrozen.org:
The OpenWrt developers are proud to announce the first release
candidate of OpenWrt Barrier Breaker.
___
we upgraded the ninux firmware to the latest OpenWrt AA.
We run into a possible bug. When STA is OpenWrt and AP is AirOS we are
not able to associate to the Access Point. We tested with the same
configuration and device the two versions of the firmware. Here the
commits:
Bad:
Hello Gui,
AirMax is disabled.
The configuration on the AirOS node is always the same with AirMax disabled.
I can associate with the good commit and I cannot when I use the bad commit
Saverio
2014-05-20 18:06 GMT+02:00 Gui Iribarren g...@altermundi.net:
On 20/05/14 05:25, Saverio Proto
to resend the patch yourself if you agree with the
changes.
Regards,
Álvaro.
El 24/04/2014 12:56, Saverio Proto escribió:
Hello,
the patch is attached to this email.
thanks
Saverio
2014-04-24 12:47 GMT+02:00 John Crispin j...@phrozen.org:
On 24/04/2014 12:44, Saverio Proto wrote:
Hello
/zioproto/openwrt-trunk-zioproto/commit/e7226ba45d7198dff71fde3caa1be9962f9f4ef1
please review it and merge it into trunk.
Saverio
2014-03-31 14:05 GMT+02:00 Saverio Proto ziopr...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I cleaned up and rebased on current trunk the patch found on the
following ticket:
https
Hello,
the patch is attached to this email.
thanks
Saverio
2014-04-24 12:47 GMT+02:00 John Crispin j...@phrozen.org:
On 24/04/2014 12:44, Saverio Proto wrote:
Hello,
talking about: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/12181
patch has been tested @ Ninux.org on TP-Link WDR3600. We are now
thanks
Saverio
commit c172caa7844b2d10e7c9d8ac574673a6451746ef
Author: Saverio Proto ziopr...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Mar 10 14:22:05 2014 +0100
Fix VLAN on Atheros AR8327N
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/12181
With this patch tagged and untagger frames are working on the same port
Yes,
the patch makes possible to have tagged+untagged vlan on the same port
at the same time.
please read https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/12181 for more details
Saverio
2014-03-31 16:05 GMT+02:00 Damian Kaczkowski
damian.kaczkowski+open...@gmail.com:
On 31 March 2014 14:05, Saverio Proto ziopr
Hello,
today I tried to boot the latest trunk with my CubieboardA10, but I
cannot boot at all.
I followed this guide:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/hardware/soc/soc.allwinner.sunxi
the most important stuff is:
dd if=openwrt-sunxi-Cubieboard-sunxi-with-spl.bin of=/dev/sdb bs=1024 seek=8
then I
Hello Luka,
my github name is zioproto and my email is correct in the MAINTAINERS file.
Saverio
2013/10/6 Luka Perkov l...@openwrt.org:
Dear openwrt-routing feed committers,
I've added MAINTAINERS file to the openwrt-routing git repository.
Please update that file with your real name and
Hello,
the attached patch updates softflowd package.
the current version is broken and not working, so please apply this patch asap.
there is currently no maintainer, if community agrees we can move this
package to openwrt-routing feed so I can take care of it.
Saverio
I used a port for a similar board (cubieboard).
It works good for me with a external kernel tree.
You might want to look at this:
https://github.com/zioproto/openwrt-sunxi/tree/sunxi-rebased
It is pretty similar board, with ARM Cortex processor.
Saverio
2013/6/24 Artur Wronowski
2. The patch description is incorrect -- the bug symptom is not
SIGPIPE. SIGPIPE is globally ignored by Polipo.
I had polipo segfaulting before applying this patch. With gdb I
thought to understand it was a SIGPIPE problem, but I can be wrong
because I am not a experienced developer.
Patch is attached,
please commit at least to trunk packages.
ciao :)
Saverio
polipo-openwrt.patch
Description: Binary data
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
1. That's commit 1144bc9a from Polipo master. Please include proper
cross-referencing information in the future.
I just got the patch from the Debian .deb package as it was and I
added it to the OpenWRT package. There is a reference to the commit in
the patch.
How can I cross-reference better
do you have a version of snmpwalk that works with IPv6 ? :)
I tried to dive into that about a year ago but then I gave up because
IPv6 and snmp is not yet well supported on Linux. Please if you have
better news tell me ! :)
ciao,
Saverio
2013/4/25 Pietro Paolini pulsarpie...@aol.com:
Hello
Anything i can do to speedup things?
no :(
I have to find some free time for the testing :(
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hello Bastian,
I successfully imported the patches in my tree.
Give me a little time for testing.
ciao,
Saverio
2013/3/11 Bastian Bittorf bitt...@bluebottle.com:
these inline patches are also here for download them:
Hello list,
do you get this email ? I got some bounces to my emails to the list
from Mailer Demon of Google with this reason:
The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn
more at http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=7720
[(0) list.openwrt.com.
Yes,
somebody wrote directly to me with Cc list.openwrt.org, and my reply
to all started to generate this bounce.
thanks
Saverio
2013/2/8 Florian Fainelli flor...@openwrt.org:
On 02/08/2013 10:46 AM, Saverio Proto wrote:
Hello list,
do you get this email ? I got some bounces to my emails
Hello,
you need to post what svn revision of OpenWRT you are compiling.
best regards
Saverio Proto
2013/2/4 Pietro Paolini p.paol...@genexis.nl:
Hi all,
I catch a problem in compiling the toolchain, I am under a:
Linux pedr0debian 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Sun Sep 23 09:49:36 UTC 2012 i686
Hello Manuel,
I tested on my router and now the patch is committed in r35053
https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/35053
thanks
Saverio
2013/1/3 Saverio Proto ziopr...@gmail.com:
Hello Manuel,
I will test your patch as soon as possible.
thanks
Saverio
2012/12/22 Manuel Munz freif
Hello Manuel,
I will test your patch as soon as possible.
thanks
Saverio
2012/12/22 Manuel Munz freif...@somakoma.de:
The initscript for tinc writes a temporary config into /tmp/tinc. In the
prepare_net function it appends flags and params from the uci config to
the temporary tinc.conf for
Hello Jack,
did you send this patch also to the mini_snmpd developers to have this
patch in the next releases ?
thanks
Saverio Proto
2012/12/21 Jack Bates k15...@nottheoilrig.com:
Support monitoring wireless signal and noise with SNMP. This is based on
the demo example distributed with Mini
Hello,
did you notify this problem upstream to radvd developers also ?
thanks
Saverio Proto
2013/1/2 Nathan Hintz nlhi...@hotmail.com:
When running 'top', I sometimes see RADVD consuming a lot of CPU (some times
close to 50%). I put some debug statements into RADVD, and have found
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Justin Vallon justinval...@gmail.com
Date: 2012/10/29
Subject: [OpenWrt-Users] Wifi trouble
To: openwrt-us...@lists.openwrt.org
Found this in system log, wifi stopped working:
Oct 29 04:03:43 kiwi kern.err kernel: [14858.50] ath: phy0:
The image that is not generated is for a device with 4Mb flash ? If
your build makes a larger image you will find only 8Mb images
generated but not the smaller ones.
I hope this help.
best regards
Saverio Proto
2012/10/25 Sivateja Patibandla patibandl...@vcu.edu:
Hey guys,
I've updated my
Hello,
I found a bug ! :)
I need this block of configuration for olsrd:
LoadPlugin olsrd_mdns.so.1.0.1
{
PlParam NonOlsrIf br-lan
PlParam TTL_Check true
PlParam MDNS_TTL 20
}
So I write this UCI syntax
config LoadPlugin
option library 'olsrd_mdns.so.1.0.1'
Thanks !
I included the patch in the Ninux firmware, as soon as I have it
tested I will report. However the patch looks so trivial that I would
ask to package maintainer to commit it immediatly :)
Moritz maybe you are interested in forking our git repository:
No release is necessary. The OpenWrt stable maintainer(s) need to backport
that fix to stable or you do it yourself or you use trunk.
Hello,
this conversation come out to be very interesting to me. I finally
realize why Ninux Pisa uses OpenWRT trunk and not a stable realease.
Marek may I ask
Looks like the committer for the OpenWRT package is Marek:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/batman-adv
did you report this problem to him ?
bye :)
Saverio
2012/5/23 Pedro Nuno Costa Rodrigues pedro...@sapo.pt:
Hello, my name is Pedro, and I'm writing from Portugal.
I would like
I applied your patch
https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/31837
Saverio
2012/5/17 Moritz Warning moritzwarn...@web.de:
On 05/17/2012 09:56 AM, ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote:
Hello,
please can you resend to me the patch as attachment ? my email client
mangled the patch.
I will review
Hello,
please can you resend to me the patch as attachment ? my email client
mangled the patch.
I will review it today. thanks
Saverio
2012/5/17 Moritz Warning moritzwarn...@web.de:
The tinc init script needs to know all valid options used in /etc/conf/tinc.
This patch updates that list to
I found the following bug in the Backfire buildroot:
If package X is in a submenu, if it exist another package Y that
requires X, than X is not represented anymore in the submenu but at
the same hierarchy of this parent. Note that Y must exist and do not
need to be selected.
Because of this the
Hello,
I starting to work with git, maybe this link:
git://nbd.name/backfire.git
should be published here:
https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/GetSource
I don't have rights to edit this wiki :)
thanks
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Hello,
from about 16 hours now I cannot browse smoothly dev.openwrt.org ..
most of the time I get
504 Gateway Time-out
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hello Nico,
i just applied a patch submitted by Manuel Munz.
https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/29134
I tested this stuff in the last 24 hours and it works to me.
In the same time I was testing you updated the init.d file... I solved
the conflict ignoring your changes.
Using start-stop-daemon
Hello Nico,
I tested and reworked Gioacchino's mini_snmpd patch to support uci
interfaces names instead of real interface names.
please check and commit. I would commit myself but I do not have
permission for that folder
ciao :)
Saverio
mini_snmpd.patch
Description: Binary data
I'm trying the patch Gioacchino,
so now config should look something like this ?
config mini_snmpd
option enabled 1
option ipv6 0
option community public
option location 'Via Gallia'
option contact 'ziopr...@gmail.com'
option interfaces 'lan'
config mini_snmpd
option enabled 1
option ipv6 0
option community public
option location 'Via Gallia'
option contact 'ziopr...@gmail.com'
option interfaces 'lan'
option interfaces 'wan'
I found my self to add more than one interface syntax
can you check if you can add that patch? It includes improvements for
6and4 operation and also for syetup of smartgw. I'm running olsrd 0.6.1
with this patch for about half a year now and it works as expected here.
It should apply clean to the init file because nothing was changed there
as
Hello,
I'm upgrading olsrd to 0.6.2
I should keep this patch ? It was introduced because the output is
parsed by some web interface ?
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/olsrd/patches/200-txtinfo_gateways_formatting.patch
The txtinfo plugin changed a bit in 0.6.2.
Hello,
the following patch do not apply cleanly to olsrd 0.6.2
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/olsrd/patches/910-quagga_workaround_remove.patch
is the new version of olsrd fixing the problem so we can remove tha
patch from the OpenWRT feed, or the patch needs upgrading to compile
Do you have qos-scripts enabled ? maybe they are not properly configured.
Saverio
2011/7/31 jerry M jerrry94...@yahoo.com:
I installed OpenWRT r.27797 on DIR-601 (hw.A1).
All pings from LAN to WAN have very high latencies which also vary a lot.
For example, outbound ping to www.google.com
Hello,
at Ninux we bought a stock of new Ubiquiti Picostation m2hg and we
noticed that the radio does not work with backfire because the
processor is not anymore ar7140 rev 2 but AR7141 rev. 1 (at least this
is the only difference we spotted).
With trunk the radio works again, so we just wonder
Hello,
I just wanted to share that I found a version of the TP-Link
TL-WR1043ND with 16MB of RAM instead of 32MB. Watch out before buying
your router :)
I opened the case and the RAM chip is Hynix H5DU2562GTR-E3C
The version on the sticker in the outer case is v.1.0 (DE) but printed
in the
Hello,
following patch to Makefile updates tinc-vpn to upstream release 1.0.15.
I tested the patch and it compiles ok.
ciao,
Saverio
PS I have some issues with my svn+ssh access, looks like I cant commit
anymore :( Maybe I'm restricted only to olsrd folder ? How can I check
this out without
Hello,
I was trying to commit the following but looks like my SVN account
does not have enough privileges because I get a Access denied.
Probably my SSH private key is good only for the olsrd package.
Here the change I was try to commit, basically just delete empty
folders from packages/net
It is here:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/start
Saverio
2011/4/28 Sven Bachmann d...@mcbachmann.de:
Hi there,
I couldn't find an info on the web if this was already discussed, but
does there exist a simple database (read: table in the wiki) which
describes what target (AR7, BRCM...) to select
So the question - does anyone work on it already? Any results?
read from here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org/msg08779.html
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
I have however a designed issue. At the moment a bash daemon periodically
checks if the wan interface is up. If the check is positive then the mesh
daemon
advertise this gateway, otherwise the mesh interface is set as default
route.
in the OLSR routing protocol implementation, we have a
I would like to suggest that everyone joins -devel on irc this next
sunday at 19:00 UTC to discuss the topic.
IRC meetings are good, but I think what is missing in this community
is some meetup face to face. I think when people know each other
directly then is much easier to understand each
I have found this http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/GSoC/2011/
on ath9k page, i see that there isn't ideas posted, is it a good idea
to fix ad-hoc + ap VAP combination on ath9k for google summer of code?
Gioacchino post it here:
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
Can I assume openwrt supports multiple routing tables?
do you mean if OpenWRT supports to configure multiple routing tables
with the UCI schemas ?
Yes. Or, if it does not, what could the best way to support this
particular case.
I'm also interested in knowing this :)
Right now I have
Can I assume openwrt supports multiple routing tables?
do you mean if OpenWRT supports to configure multiple routing tables
with the UCI schemas ?
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
I would really like to go - would there be interest in adding an
adhoc-springtime-openwrt-developer meeting.
I visited Guifi.net a few years ago, and it is a wonderful area with
wonderful people.
even user meeting would be cool :) Because a lot of developers will
be there we can organize
==
Announcing the Wireless Battle Mesh v4
(16-20 March 2011, Sant Bartomeu del Grau, Spain)
==
The next 'Wireless Battle of the Mesh' will take place from
Wed 16th till Sun
https://dev.openwrt.org/attachment/ticket/6696/tmp.diff
any reason why this patch is not included in Backfire 10.03.1 ?
I'm using this patch compiling my firmware on the backfire branch, all
seems working good.
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
any reason why this patch is not included in Backfire 10.03.1 ?
Nobody demanded a backport yet.
At Ninux we are using hashlimit, and many times we recompile backfire
instead of using snapshots because we need that patch.
Backporting would be appreciated :)
Saverio
Are you compiling trunk ?
Make sure this patch is in your build:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/target/linux/uml/patches-2.6.34/002-gcc4_unfortify_source.patch
I had problem before with UML and 64bit machines (I was not using
trunk), when I backported this patch everything went ok
I'm thinking it would be nice to have a macro package that selects a
platform, boot format, packages on that platform, etc.
For instance, being able to build a target called
net5501-asterisk-squashfs... What are the steps to making this happen?
you can have a package that once selected
Once you telnet into it try to type uname -a and see if it is Linux ! :)
Saverio
2010/7/29 Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca:
I inherited from a DSL modem+router whose firmware describe as a Solos
4610 RD / Solos 461x CSP v1.0, and telnet shows me a big
`conexant' banner.
Does anyone
Why don't you use the OpenWRT toolchain and the OpenWRT packaging to
cross-compile ?
Saverio
2010/7/8 Airton Ishimori nobumasa@gmail.com:
Some problem with my Makefile ??
OLSRD_PLUGIN = true
PLUGIN_NAME = olsrd_test
PLUGIN_VER = 0.1
TOPDIR = ../..
include
I need to overwrite some configuration files, but the system overrides in
alphabetical order.
Instead of overwriting config files that is not supported, you better
use the uci-defaults mechanism.
Put the script in /etc/uci-defaults/some-name and do the required uci stuff.
It will be evaluated
I've been trying to figure out how to setup a box behind my router (running
Backfire) and make it publicly routable. This is needed since it is running
services for which no properly working ALGs are available under Linux. I'm
fairly sure there's something obvious I'm missing, so that's why
OpenWrt is still looking for more package maintainers. A list of
current maintainers is located at
https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/packages . If you are interested please
let me know and I will get you setup.
I can volunteer to maintain the OLSR package.
Travis, I'm going to write you offlist,
Hello,
many of you already know about the Wireless Battle Mesh (2-6 June in Italy)
http://battlemesh.org/BattleMeshV3
Some devs from OpenWRT, like Nico, are in the organization of the event
the event has also a social character, we want to involve people in
free wireless, in community networks
Hello,
sorry for people receiving this email from different mailing list.
just to point out that olsr (stable) is changing a lot its
configuration file with new things/features.
UCI configuration and LuCI web interface should take care of new
configuration variable (like RtPolicy)
So next the
And packets are sent by the laptop but not received by the nanostation
according to tcpdump (attached) but they do if I use eth0 instead of eth1 to
connect the laptop and the nanostation m5. Also I attach olsrd output with
-d 3.
is eth1 inside the bridge ? Try without the bridge.
Saverio
I'm trying to build OpenWrt for the UML-target on x86_64. While this works
fine on x86, on x86_64 machines I get the following error:
I had the same problem with UML, I fixed like this:
cd $trunk_dir$/staging_dir/toolchain-x86_64_gcc-4.1.2_uClibc-0.9.30.1/
ln -s lib lib64
Saverio
1) get the erlang package
./scripts/feeds install erlang
output -- WARNING! No feed for package 'erlang' found, maybe it's
already part of the standard packages?
Hey, this are the packages you are getting with 8.09.2:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/branches/packages_8.09/lang
the erlang
The OpenWRT router was able to talk with other native IPv6 hosts (like
ipv6.google.com) because the traffic was arriving encapsulated in IPv4
packets with source $remoteip4.
But when you talk IPv6 with other 6to4 hosts the $remoteip4 is always
different. The following trivial patch fixes the
Is rsync at openwrt.org now closed ?
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
I applied your patch in r19069 - sorry for the delay.
I don't understand if this patch changes how to write the configuration file
For example I have some blocks like this in my /etc/config/dhcp
config host macprosaverio
option name macprosaverio
option mac 00:23:6c:99:87:be
I think I found a bug in scripts/kconfig.pl
looks like if I use the name openwrt-8.09.1-UML for the folder where I
have my buildroot the build process dies at make target/linux
look here:
save...@nordkapp ~/SORGENTI/openwrt-8.09.1-UML $ make V=99
make[1]: Entering directory
Hello Nico,
I'm still testing some UML stuff, I understand now why I was not able
to compile the 8.09.1 tag on my x86_64 host.
I was able to compile trunk because there is patch from trunk:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/target/linux/uml/patches/002-gcc4_unfortify_source.patch
that
Alina wrote:
I think the one IP per interface principle is a legacy thinking.
I agree with that, long time ago I opened this ticket:
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/2829
is was IPv4 but it was the same problem.
Bastian wrote:
PS: see you at 26c3!
I'll also be there ! :)
Saverio
Are there any other uml openwrt users out there? What are you doing
with the new uml releases (aside from developing openwrt?)
Hello,
sorry if you receive this email twice because you are in both mailing lists.
I successfully compiled a OpenWRT UML Image and used it in the Netkit [0]
I got
very interesting!
The page you mention has been linked from the Netkit web site:
http://wiki.netkit.org/index.php/Labs_Links.
thanks ! :)
About the tap, host-side setup is performed by the
$NETKIT_HOME/bin/manage_tuntap script, and this is almost all that is
required to get it running. The
very interesting!
The page you mention has been linked from the Netkit web site:
http://wiki.netkit.org/index.php/Labs_Links.
Massimo there is a little wrong detail on the web site.
I did not use only the OpenWRT kernel. I used both OpenWRT kernel AND
filesystem ! :)
Saverio
Hello,
at Ninux.org we want to get rid of a our custom package that
configures the router for our network but introduces file collision
between packages.
I heard there is a script that is run at the first boot where we can
introduce some uci set commands ... what is the name if this script
?
What is the proper way to support such build? Obviously, it can be
easily done by creating two completely independent package
specifications, but that would lead to unnecessary duplication.
look at the iperf package for an example:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/iperf
it is only
# opkg install kmod-sched
Collected errors:
* Packages were found, but none compatible with the architectures configured
I had the same problem with weekend upgrading some packages on same
devices running 8.09.1 tag, and packages were compiled using the trunk
toolchain.
I don't know exactly
I compiled a firmware for Fonera with the current 8.09 branch r18049
and looks like WiFi is broken in ad-hoc mode.
Now I'm compiling again with tag 8.09.1 to see if the problem is
related to a recent changeset.
I'll keep you updated.
Saverio
___
Please upgrade olsrd to 0.5.6-r6 also in 8.09 branch.
Necessary patch is attached.
Thank you
Saverio
Index: net/olsrd/Makefile
===
--- net/olsrd/Makefile (revisione 18046)
+++ net/olsrd/Makefile (copia locale)
@@ -9,13 +9,13 @@
Hello,
asking on the olsrd-dev lists I've been told something like this was
missing, so I implemented it into a package feed. Sorry if you receive
this mail multiple times because you are subscribed to more mailing
lists.
adding the following feed:
echo src-svn zzzninux
IPv6 addresses to my router !
But how do you assign IPv6 addresses at boot ?
Can you reproduce this bug ?
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/5356
there is out there some patch not already committed that fixes this problem ??
thank you :)
Saverio Proto
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo