Hi Mark,
> On Oct 11, 2023, at 21:05, Mark Thurston wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 18:04:41 +0100 Dave Taht wrote ---
>> Anyone got a ps4 or ps5 and can take a packet capture at their router?
>> Dying to know if it is cubic or bbr in particular
>>
>
> Sorry if this is a silly comment
> On Apr 15, 2023, at 10:19, Petr Štetiar wrote:
>
> Paul Spooren [2023-04-15 02:02:24]:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I’d simply disable it instead of no longer updating it, any other opinions?
>
> fine with me, thanks for taking care. I would simply announce it in several
> places, that there is a plan to
MVEBU devices are not supported in kernel 5.10 based OpenWrt22.03.3 due to a
bug.
The fix is already in 5.15, but seems to intrusive to backport.
Current snapshot builds are on kernel 5.15 already and the issue does not exist
anymore.
So the easy ways forward are:
1) stick to 22.03.2
2) switch (
Hi Thibaut,
> On Nov 17, 2022, at 16:53, Thibaut wrote:
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
>> Le 17 nov. 2022 à 16:19, Sebastian Moeller a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Thibaut,
>
> [...]
>>>>> Although I must confess that it certainly feels counter-intuitive that
Hi Thibaut,
> On Nov 17, 2022, at 16:00, Thibaut wrote:
>
>
>
>> Le 17 nov. 2022 à 15:42, Sebastian Moeller a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Thibaut,
>>
>>> On Nov 17, 2022, at 15:22, Thibaut wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Sebastian,
>>>
&g
Hi Thibaut,
> On Nov 17, 2022, at 15:22, Thibaut wrote:
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
>> Le 17 nov. 2022 à 10:50, Sebastian Moeller a écrit :
>>
>> Hi T.
>>
>>
>> so taking your proposa under consideration I canged the section that threw
>> y
t;> Le 16 nov. 2022 à 11:49, Sebastian Moeller a écrit :
>>
>> HI T.
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 16, 2022, at 11:22, Thibaut wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> A few questions for the CAKE experts here:
>>
>> Q
Hi T.
> On Nov 16, 2022, at 12:46, Thibaut wrote:
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
>> Le 16 nov. 2022 à 11:49, Sebastian Moeller a écrit :
>>
>> HI T.
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 16, 2022, at 11:22, Thibaut wrote:
HI T.
> On Nov 16, 2022, at 11:22, Thibaut wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> A few questions for the CAKE experts here:
Quick note, this is not necessarily the best place to get advice on
cake, both the cake mailing list and the OpenWrt forum tend to be directer
paths to the "bakers".
>
> I’m
Hi Jo,
I was under the impression* that bridge-vlan filtering is something that can be
relegated to the switch hardware, while creating a bridge between VLAN
interfaces happens in software. Is that wrong?
Regards
Sebastian
*) Not sure where I got that impression from
> On Sep 7, 202
Not that I would know, being a user not a developer
> On Jun 16, 2022, at 13:33, Ravi Paluri (QUIC)
> wrote:
>
> Hi jo,
>
>>> it is not the same. There is no special handling for specific overlay file
>>> paths in procd.
> If the behavior is not same, can you let me know how "below" is
Dear Felix,
with great joy did I notice that you enabled the qos_map_set feature of hostapd
and supply a new default map that aligns OpenWrt's DSCP-2-AC mapping with
RFC8325
Cimmit: a5e3def1822431ef6436cb493df77006dbacafd6
hostapd: add wmm qos map set by default
This implements the mapping re
Smal typo? Mumber instead of Number?
Best Regards
Sebastian
> On Mar 9, 2021, at 12:36, Florian Eckert wrote:
>
> With the old ubus dsl API, the numbers for the individual line_states and
> power_states were also returned. These were not ported to the new DSL
> C-API. This commit change
Hi Florian,
> On Jun 16, 2020, at 14:18, Florian Eckert wrote:
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> thanks for your comment
>
>>> - "0xd00")s="resync" ;;
>>> - "0x3c0")s="short init entry" ;;
>>> - "") s="not running daemon"; ls="0xfff" ;;
>>> -
> On Oct 16, 2019, at 21:54, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Does it impact OpenWrt ? or just some OpenWrt based distributions ?
>> (might influence who need to fix this ;) )
>
> it impacts the usage of the kmod compatibility repositories - apparently
> they're completely ignored by opkg
Thanks for the update.
On October 11, 2019 12:59:04 PM GMT+02:00, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>Hi Bjørn,
>
>> Or: Start discussing the release blockers here and now. Thanks.
>
>1) Blocker: LuCI master needs to be backported to 19.07
> Time estimate: 2-3 weeks
>
>2) Blocker: All relevant sub-compone
Mmmh, I have a hunch a recent observation of mine might be related
(unfortunately I have no log data):
Within a set of recent master builds, sysupgrade from a system running for a
few days resulted in the expected behavior in that sysupgrade disconnected the
current ssh connection and the LED p
Please see
https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=commit;h=4bd9d331e5854e8325fd3b7a5f14e355a6a3c66d
for why the typo disappeared from master
> On Jan 12, 2019, at 21:56, Petr Štetiar wrote:
>
> Thomas Endt [2019-01-12 09:32:43]:
>
> Hi,
>
>> FYI: There is a typo in 3 files: "u
> On Dec 7, 2018, at 08:29, Shaleen Jain wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [...]
> The point about these boards requiring a lot of modification to be useful is
> simply not true.
> I have a TP-Link tl-wr841n-v11 running the master branch with kernel 4.14
> with luci
> and sqm-scripts + miniupnpd with no
Dear mhei,
> On Oct 12, 2018, at 20:53, Michael Heimpold wrote:
>
> Am Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018, 22:44:53 CEST schrieb Sebastian Moeller:
>> Dear Luiz,
>>
>> thank you very much for this information. By now I have realized that printf
>> evaluated lo
Dear Luiz,
thank you very much for this information. By now I have realized that printf
evaluated locale (specifically LC_NUMERIC) at least on non-openwrt unices,
which makes it unfortunately unusable for my purpose.
Best Regards
Sebastian
> On Oct 11, 2018, at 19:58, Luiz Angelo Daro
Dear Developers,
for a function for sqm-scripts I would very much like to use printf from inside
a shell script. I would also like for sqm-scripts to keep working on all
"compliant" openwrt builds. So here is my question, can I rely on the printf
binary (or a link to the busybox fprintf) to be
Dear Jérôme,
> On Sep 29, 2018, at 10:53, Jérôme Benoit wrote:
>
> Le 28/09/2018 à 18:55, Rosen Penev a écrit :
>>
>> So in kernel 4.17 I believe landed flow offloading support. This
>> accomplishes something similar to SFE while being a proper upstream
>> solution. This is already implemente
Hi David,
On May 16, 2016 10:46:25 AM GMT+02:00, David Lang wrote:
>On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>
>> On 16 May 2016 at 11:12, David Lang wrote:
>>> On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>>>
On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:5
On Sep 9, 2015, at 15:20 , Hannu Nyman wrote:
> I repeat my earlier wish that trunk should be renamed as soon as possible.
>
> There has been several changes during the summer that have made trunk to
> significantly deviate from the CC branch. Some of the changes are under the
> hood (like mu
Hi,
great news the RC3 announcement.
thanks a lot.
On Jul 16, 2015, at 17:11 , ql li wrote:
> AQM inflexible, overly complex set
Could you elaborate a bit? Which AQM system do you find inflexible,
qos-scripts or sqm-scripts?
Complex to set up, I wonder? Both systems have a luci GUI i
Hi Valent,
On Mar 25, 2015, at 15:54 , valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hahahaha, I'm so embarrassed :) And thank you very, very much!
Don’t be embarrassed! But, please, post the resolution of your issue to
the openwrt forum topic as well, so the solution is well documented for Googl
Hi Toke, hi Alan,
On Feb 15, 2015, at 17:18 , Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Sebastian Moeller writes:
>
>> Not that I have shown great taste in the past, but I think it
>> would be somewhat cleaner to put the logic into the hot plug script
>> and keep run.sh “si
Hi Alan,
On Feb 15, 2015, at 15:39 , Alan Jenkins
wrote:
> Hi Toke
>
> I tried installing sqm-scripts from trunk, on Barrier Breaker on my wndr3800.
>
> It's very effective, but I notice SQM isn't applied at boot time. The system
> log complains about pppoe-wan interface not existing, when t
Hi Toke,
On Feb 15, 2015, at 16:56 , Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Sebastian Moeller writes:
>
>> I am not sure that this works as intended. The first thing
>> run.sh does is take down all running SQM instances:
>
> Ah yes, seems I was a bit too trigger-ha
t would be nice
to keep that capability).
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
> -Toke
>
#!/bin/sh
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
# published by the Free Software Foundation.
#
#
Hello Derek,
Thanks for trying SQM.
On Dec 28, 2014, at 03:29 , Derek & Vicky wrote:
> I've installed and configured the SQM QOS module for my Bleeding Edge, r43718
> access point. The access point runs on the sunxi A20 processor with 1
> Ethernet and 1 USB powered Wifi adapter. A 5 port s
Hi Jaime,
On Nov 21, 2014, at 12:49 , Jaime T wrote:
> On 20 November 2014 20:49, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>> Hi Jaime,
>> not an expert on adel modem errors, let alone lantiq, here is my attempt at
>> helping out:
>
> Hi Sebastien. Thank you for trying t
Hi Jaime,
not an expert on adel modem errors, let alone lantiq, here is my attempt at
helping out:
On Nov 20, 2014, at 17:26 , Jaime T wrote:
> On 17 November 2014 18:36, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>> Hi Jaime,
>> maybe you should also look at the rror counters. Especially
Hi Michael,
On Nov 17, 2014, at 18:39 , Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Richard Mortimer wrote:
>> I think I saw something similar when I was using an ADSL connection.
>
>> When the connection was under full load (I don't remember whether it
>> was upstream, downstream or both) the LCP echo re
Hi Richard, hi Jaime
On Nov 17, 2014, at 12:33 , Richard Mortimer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15/11/2014 10:40, Jaime T wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I'm running "barrier breaker" (r42625) on a BTHOMEHUBV2B and it's
>> great apart from frequent adsl disconnections (approx 40 per day). My
>> adsl-type is P
Hi Jaime,
maybe you should also look at the rror counters. Especially the CRC and HEC
errors short before the connection drops might be interesting.
Best Regards
Sebastian
On Nov 16, 2014, at 15:43 , Jaime T wrote:
> On 15 November 2014 20:46, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> How do you
~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.50-1/packages
to /etc/opkg.conf
but I do not know the exact incantation of that, maybe hnyman, or Dave know the
correct answer to this..
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
> Regards,
> Luis Garcia
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote
Ooops,
On Oct 9, 2014, at 20:13 , Dave Taht wrote:
> 3.3 is obsolete, use 3.10.
What Dave says, I should have actually looked at the copied link…
Sorry
Sebastian
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> On Oct
Hi Richard,
On Oct 9, 2014, at 18:42 , Richard Smith wrote:
> On 10/06/2014 03:41 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I have spare routers that I can run OpenWRT or CeroWRt on and I'm
>>> setup to test with netperf, netperf-wrapper on my local net
Hello Stephan,
On Oct 9, 2014, at 01:01 , Stephan Günther wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Hannu Nyman wrote:
>> Dave Taht wrote on Thu Oct 2 03:49:15 CEST 2014:
>>> So I don't know where to go. Certainly I'd like to see the battle hardened
>>> sqm scripts (which are more fle
Hi Richard,
On Oct 6, 2014, at 18:02 , Richard A. Smith wrote:
> On 10/02/2014 10:05 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>
>> I assume you are talking about the pure routing performance with no
>> firewall/NAT and traffic-shaping involved? I think they pretty much are
>
Hi Dave,
On Oct 3, 2014, at 01:07 , Dave Taht wrote:
[cut a lot...]
> But: the real killer, on ingress shaping, is the call to skb_clone in
> sch_ingress->act_mirred path, I think.
So I thought that we basically have around 50Mbps “shaping-capability”
on the wndrs which hew can distrib
Hi Weedy,
On Oct 2, 2014, at 05:46 , Alpha Sparc wrote:
> How good is the throughput on CeroWrt compared to OpenWrt ?
I assume you are talking about the pure routing performance with no
firewall/NAT and traffic-shaping involved? I think they pretty much are equal
(pretty much the same
Hi Gui, hi list,
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Juli 2014 um 05:56 Uhr
Von: "Gui Iribarren"
An: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Betreff: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] IPv6 firewall and Port Control Protocol (Was:
Barrier Breaker 14.07-rc1)
On 17/07/14 21:59, Fernando Frediani wrote:
> > Perfect and well said.
Hi Karl,
On July 17, 2014 11:40:52 PM CEST, Karl P wrote:
>
>
>On 07/17/2014 08:26 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>>
>>I argue that people unable to change the router settings are
>better of with all unsolicited inbound traffic disabled.
>
>I've tried to
Hello Benjamin,
On July 17, 2014 7:45:10 PM CEST, Benjamin Cama wrote:
>Le mercredi 16 juillet 2014 à 21:12 +0200, Sebastian Moeller a écrit :
>> What is so wonderful about IPv6? Maleware surely will evolve quickly
>> to take advantage of a dropped layer of defense…
>
Hi Gui,
On Jul 16, 2014, at 20:10 , Gui Iribarren wrote:
> On 16/07/14 12:09, Gert Doering wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 08:41:50AM -0300, Gui Iribarren wrote:
>>> then, what happens when those devices are deployed in a myriad of
>>> real-world scenarios? hackers rejoice!
>>
>>
Hi John,
On Jan 21, 2014, at 21:41 , John Crispin wrote:
>
> On 21/01/2014 21:35, James Cloos wrote:
>>> "JC" == John Crispin writes:
>> JC> * unit most likely runs on a ghz arm soc made by marvell
>>
>> IIRC, semiaccurate reported that it uses an atom processor.
That truly was
>
> best regards,
> Stefan
>
>
> 2014/1/6 Sebastian Moeller
> Hi Etienne,
>
>
> On Jan 6, 2014, at 13:01 , Etienne CHAMPETIER
> wrote:
>
> > Simply scan for the most recent file in /etc and set
> > system time to this file modification time if it
Hi Etienne,
On Jan 6, 2014, at 13:01 , Etienne CHAMPETIER
wrote:
> Simply scan for the most recent file in /etc and set
> system time to this file modification time if it's in the future
> It allow some time dependent program to work immediatly
> without waiting for ntpd to sync
>
> v1: v2: b
Hi John,
On Dec 18, 2013, at 11:42 , John Crispin wrote:
> On 18/12/13 11:41, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>> So, should I send a patch? Against what version, or should I contact
>> the maintainer (do you happen to know who that would be?)
>
> Hi,
>
> that would
Hi John,
On Dec 17, 2013, at 12:51 , John Crispin wrote:
> On 17/12/13 12:49, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>> replacing all invocations of "mount" with "/usr/mount"
>
>
> i think this would be the correct approach.
So, should I send a patch? Aga
ount" or "busy box mount", unless
mount-utils is deprecated.
Best Regards
Sebastian Moeller
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
HI Pawel,
On Dec 12, 2013, at 21:47 , Pawel Pastuszak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using pretty much the trunk version of openwrt and i want to adjust the
> tmpfs /tmp size? I recall in old version of openwrt it was in
> 10_essential_fs but the new version i cannot find it.
>
> Can someone point
Hi there,
On Jan 11, 2013, at 05:16 , Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On 13-01-11 07:29 AM, etienne.champet...@free.fr wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/packet.scheduler/packet.scheduler
>
> Note that OP described wanting to distribute "download" bandwidth for
> users. The documen
Hi Felix,
On Oct 1, 2012, at 10:26 , Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2012-10-01 6:49 PM, Dave Täht wrote:
>> From: Dave Taht
>>
>> After queue lengths start getting out of hand, try to preserve memory
>> by shortening skbs to their truesize on the common pfifo, codel, and
>> fq_codel qdiscs.
>>
>>
57 matches
Mail list logo
