Hello,
I found a bug ! :)
I need this block of configuration for olsrd:
LoadPlugin olsrd_mdns.so.1.0.1
{
PlParam NonOlsrIf br-lan
PlParam TTL_Check true
PlParam MDNS_TTL 20
}
So I write this UCI syntax
config LoadPlugin
option library 'olsrd_mdns.so.1.0.1'
Thanks !
I included the patch in the Ninux firmware, as soon as I have it
tested I will report. However the patch looks so trivial that I would
ask to package maintainer to commit it immediatly :)
Moritz maybe you are interested in forking our git repository:
No release is necessary. The OpenWrt stable maintainer(s) need to backport
that fix to stable or you do it yourself or you use trunk.
Hello,
this conversation come out to be very interesting to me. I finally
realize why Ninux Pisa uses OpenWRT trunk and not a stable realease.
Marek may I ask
Looks like the committer for the OpenWRT package is Marek:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/batman-adv
did you report this problem to him ?
bye :)
Saverio
2012/5/23 Pedro Nuno Costa Rodrigues pedro...@sapo.pt:
Hello, my name is Pedro, and I'm writing from Portugal.
I would like
I applied your patch
https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/31837
Saverio
2012/5/17 Moritz Warning moritzwarn...@web.de:
On 05/17/2012 09:56 AM, ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote:
Hello,
please can you resend to me the patch as attachment ? my email client
mangled the patch.
I will review
Hello,
please can you resend to me the patch as attachment ? my email client
mangled the patch.
I will review it today. thanks
Saverio
2012/5/17 Moritz Warning moritzwarn...@web.de:
The tinc init script needs to know all valid options used in /etc/conf/tinc.
This patch updates that list to
I found the following bug in the Backfire buildroot:
If package X is in a submenu, if it exist another package Y that
requires X, than X is not represented anymore in the submenu but at
the same hierarchy of this parent. Note that Y must exist and do not
need to be selected.
Because of this the
Hello,
I starting to work with git, maybe this link:
git://nbd.name/backfire.git
should be published here:
https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/GetSource
I don't have rights to edit this wiki :)
thanks
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Hello,
from about 16 hours now I cannot browse smoothly dev.openwrt.org ..
most of the time I get
504 Gateway Time-out
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hello Nico,
i just applied a patch submitted by Manuel Munz.
https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/29134
I tested this stuff in the last 24 hours and it works to me.
In the same time I was testing you updated the init.d file... I solved
the conflict ignoring your changes.
Using start-stop-daemon
Hello Nico,
I tested and reworked Gioacchino's mini_snmpd patch to support uci
interfaces names instead of real interface names.
please check and commit. I would commit myself but I do not have
permission for that folder
ciao :)
Saverio
mini_snmpd.patch
Description: Binary data
I'm trying the patch Gioacchino,
so now config should look something like this ?
config mini_snmpd
option enabled 1
option ipv6 0
option community public
option location 'Via Gallia'
option contact 'ziopr...@gmail.com'
option interfaces 'lan'
config mini_snmpd
option enabled 1
option ipv6 0
option community public
option location 'Via Gallia'
option contact 'ziopr...@gmail.com'
option interfaces 'lan'
option interfaces 'wan'
I found my self to add more than one interface syntax
can you check if you can add that patch? It includes improvements for
6and4 operation and also for syetup of smartgw. I'm running olsrd 0.6.1
with this patch for about half a year now and it works as expected here.
It should apply clean to the init file because nothing was changed there
as
Hello,
I'm upgrading olsrd to 0.6.2
I should keep this patch ? It was introduced because the output is
parsed by some web interface ?
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/olsrd/patches/200-txtinfo_gateways_formatting.patch
The txtinfo plugin changed a bit in 0.6.2.
Hello,
the following patch do not apply cleanly to olsrd 0.6.2
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/olsrd/patches/910-quagga_workaround_remove.patch
is the new version of olsrd fixing the problem so we can remove tha
patch from the OpenWRT feed, or the patch needs upgrading to compile
Do you have qos-scripts enabled ? maybe they are not properly configured.
Saverio
2011/7/31 jerry M jerrry94...@yahoo.com:
I installed OpenWRT r.27797 on DIR-601 (hw.A1).
All pings from LAN to WAN have very high latencies which also vary a lot.
For example, outbound ping to www.google.com
Hello,
at Ninux we bought a stock of new Ubiquiti Picostation m2hg and we
noticed that the radio does not work with backfire because the
processor is not anymore ar7140 rev 2 but AR7141 rev. 1 (at least this
is the only difference we spotted).
With trunk the radio works again, so we just wonder
Hello,
I just wanted to share that I found a version of the TP-Link
TL-WR1043ND with 16MB of RAM instead of 32MB. Watch out before buying
your router :)
I opened the case and the RAM chip is Hynix H5DU2562GTR-E3C
The version on the sticker in the outer case is v.1.0 (DE) but printed
in the
Hello,
following patch to Makefile updates tinc-vpn to upstream release 1.0.15.
I tested the patch and it compiles ok.
ciao,
Saverio
PS I have some issues with my svn+ssh access, looks like I cant commit
anymore :( Maybe I'm restricted only to olsrd folder ? How can I check
this out without
Hello,
I was trying to commit the following but looks like my SVN account
does not have enough privileges because I get a Access denied.
Probably my SSH private key is good only for the olsrd package.
Here the change I was try to commit, basically just delete empty
folders from packages/net
It is here:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/start
Saverio
2011/4/28 Sven Bachmann d...@mcbachmann.de:
Hi there,
I couldn't find an info on the web if this was already discussed, but
does there exist a simple database (read: table in the wiki) which
describes what target (AR7, BRCM...) to select
So the question - does anyone work on it already? Any results?
read from here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org/msg08779.html
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
I have however a designed issue. At the moment a bash daemon periodically
checks if the wan interface is up. If the check is positive then the mesh
daemon
advertise this gateway, otherwise the mesh interface is set as default
route.
in the OLSR routing protocol implementation, we have a
I would like to suggest that everyone joins -devel on irc this next
sunday at 19:00 UTC to discuss the topic.
IRC meetings are good, but I think what is missing in this community
is some meetup face to face. I think when people know each other
directly then is much easier to understand each
I have found this http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/GSoC/2011/
on ath9k page, i see that there isn't ideas posted, is it a good idea
to fix ad-hoc + ap VAP combination on ath9k for google summer of code?
Gioacchino post it here:
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
Can I assume openwrt supports multiple routing tables?
do you mean if OpenWRT supports to configure multiple routing tables
with the UCI schemas ?
Yes. Or, if it does not, what could the best way to support this
particular case.
I'm also interested in knowing this :)
Right now I have
Can I assume openwrt supports multiple routing tables?
do you mean if OpenWRT supports to configure multiple routing tables
with the UCI schemas ?
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
I would really like to go - would there be interest in adding an
adhoc-springtime-openwrt-developer meeting.
I visited Guifi.net a few years ago, and it is a wonderful area with
wonderful people.
even user meeting would be cool :) Because a lot of developers will
be there we can organize
==
Announcing the Wireless Battle Mesh v4
(16-20 March 2011, Sant Bartomeu del Grau, Spain)
==
The next 'Wireless Battle of the Mesh' will take place from
Wed 16th till Sun
https://dev.openwrt.org/attachment/ticket/6696/tmp.diff
any reason why this patch is not included in Backfire 10.03.1 ?
I'm using this patch compiling my firmware on the backfire branch, all
seems working good.
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
any reason why this patch is not included in Backfire 10.03.1 ?
Nobody demanded a backport yet.
At Ninux we are using hashlimit, and many times we recompile backfire
instead of using snapshots because we need that patch.
Backporting would be appreciated :)
Saverio
Are you compiling trunk ?
Make sure this patch is in your build:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/target/linux/uml/patches-2.6.34/002-gcc4_unfortify_source.patch
I had problem before with UML and 64bit machines (I was not using
trunk), when I backported this patch everything went ok
I'm thinking it would be nice to have a macro package that selects a
platform, boot format, packages on that platform, etc.
For instance, being able to build a target called
net5501-asterisk-squashfs... What are the steps to making this happen?
you can have a package that once selected
Once you telnet into it try to type uname -a and see if it is Linux ! :)
Saverio
2010/7/29 Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca:
I inherited from a DSL modem+router whose firmware describe as a Solos
4610 RD / Solos 461x CSP v1.0, and telnet shows me a big
`conexant' banner.
Does anyone
Why don't you use the OpenWRT toolchain and the OpenWRT packaging to
cross-compile ?
Saverio
2010/7/8 Airton Ishimori nobumasa@gmail.com:
Some problem with my Makefile ??
OLSRD_PLUGIN = true
PLUGIN_NAME = olsrd_test
PLUGIN_VER = 0.1
TOPDIR = ../..
include
I need to overwrite some configuration files, but the system overrides in
alphabetical order.
Instead of overwriting config files that is not supported, you better
use the uci-defaults mechanism.
Put the script in /etc/uci-defaults/some-name and do the required uci stuff.
It will be evaluated
I've been trying to figure out how to setup a box behind my router (running
Backfire) and make it publicly routable. This is needed since it is running
services for which no properly working ALGs are available under Linux. I'm
fairly sure there's something obvious I'm missing, so that's why
OpenWrt is still looking for more package maintainers. A list of
current maintainers is located at
https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/packages . If you are interested please
let me know and I will get you setup.
I can volunteer to maintain the OLSR package.
Travis, I'm going to write you offlist,
Hello,
many of you already know about the Wireless Battle Mesh (2-6 June in Italy)
http://battlemesh.org/BattleMeshV3
Some devs from OpenWRT, like Nico, are in the organization of the event
the event has also a social character, we want to involve people in
free wireless, in community networks
Hello,
sorry for people receiving this email from different mailing list.
just to point out that olsr (stable) is changing a lot its
configuration file with new things/features.
UCI configuration and LuCI web interface should take care of new
configuration variable (like RtPolicy)
So next the
And packets are sent by the laptop but not received by the nanostation
according to tcpdump (attached) but they do if I use eth0 instead of eth1 to
connect the laptop and the nanostation m5. Also I attach olsrd output with
-d 3.
is eth1 inside the bridge ? Try without the bridge.
Saverio
I'm trying to build OpenWrt for the UML-target on x86_64. While this works
fine on x86, on x86_64 machines I get the following error:
I had the same problem with UML, I fixed like this:
cd $trunk_dir$/staging_dir/toolchain-x86_64_gcc-4.1.2_uClibc-0.9.30.1/
ln -s lib lib64
Saverio
1) get the erlang package
./scripts/feeds install erlang
output -- WARNING! No feed for package 'erlang' found, maybe it's
already part of the standard packages?
Hey, this are the packages you are getting with 8.09.2:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/branches/packages_8.09/lang
the erlang
The OpenWRT router was able to talk with other native IPv6 hosts (like
ipv6.google.com) because the traffic was arriving encapsulated in IPv4
packets with source $remoteip4.
But when you talk IPv6 with other 6to4 hosts the $remoteip4 is always
different. The following trivial patch fixes the
Is rsync at openwrt.org now closed ?
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
I applied your patch in r19069 - sorry for the delay.
I don't understand if this patch changes how to write the configuration file
For example I have some blocks like this in my /etc/config/dhcp
config host macprosaverio
option name macprosaverio
option mac 00:23:6c:99:87:be
I think I found a bug in scripts/kconfig.pl
looks like if I use the name openwrt-8.09.1-UML for the folder where I
have my buildroot the build process dies at make target/linux
look here:
save...@nordkapp ~/SORGENTI/openwrt-8.09.1-UML $ make V=99
make[1]: Entering directory
Hello Nico,
I'm still testing some UML stuff, I understand now why I was not able
to compile the 8.09.1 tag on my x86_64 host.
I was able to compile trunk because there is patch from trunk:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/target/linux/uml/patches/002-gcc4_unfortify_source.patch
that
Alina wrote:
I think the one IP per interface principle is a legacy thinking.
I agree with that, long time ago I opened this ticket:
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/2829
is was IPv4 but it was the same problem.
Bastian wrote:
PS: see you at 26c3!
I'll also be there ! :)
Saverio
Are there any other uml openwrt users out there? What are you doing
with the new uml releases (aside from developing openwrt?)
Hello,
sorry if you receive this email twice because you are in both mailing lists.
I successfully compiled a OpenWRT UML Image and used it in the Netkit [0]
I got
very interesting!
The page you mention has been linked from the Netkit web site:
http://wiki.netkit.org/index.php/Labs_Links.
thanks ! :)
About the tap, host-side setup is performed by the
$NETKIT_HOME/bin/manage_tuntap script, and this is almost all that is
required to get it running. The
very interesting!
The page you mention has been linked from the Netkit web site:
http://wiki.netkit.org/index.php/Labs_Links.
Massimo there is a little wrong detail on the web site.
I did not use only the OpenWRT kernel. I used both OpenWRT kernel AND
filesystem ! :)
Saverio
Hello,
at Ninux.org we want to get rid of a our custom package that
configures the router for our network but introduces file collision
between packages.
I heard there is a script that is run at the first boot where we can
introduce some uci set commands ... what is the name if this script
?
What is the proper way to support such build? Obviously, it can be
easily done by creating two completely independent package
specifications, but that would lead to unnecessary duplication.
look at the iperf package for an example:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/iperf
it is only
# opkg install kmod-sched
Collected errors:
* Packages were found, but none compatible with the architectures configured
I had the same problem with weekend upgrading some packages on same
devices running 8.09.1 tag, and packages were compiled using the trunk
toolchain.
I don't know exactly
I compiled a firmware for Fonera with the current 8.09 branch r18049
and looks like WiFi is broken in ad-hoc mode.
Now I'm compiling again with tag 8.09.1 to see if the problem is
related to a recent changeset.
I'll keep you updated.
Saverio
___
Please upgrade olsrd to 0.5.6-r6 also in 8.09 branch.
Necessary patch is attached.
Thank you
Saverio
Index: net/olsrd/Makefile
===
--- net/olsrd/Makefile (revisione 18046)
+++ net/olsrd/Makefile (copia locale)
@@ -9,13 +9,13 @@
Hello,
asking on the olsrd-dev lists I've been told something like this was
missing, so I implemented it into a package feed. Sorry if you receive
this mail multiple times because you are subscribed to more mailing
lists.
adding the following feed:
echo src-svn zzzninux
Any comments, ideas, flames? I'm also hanging around on #openwrt as
moonflux.
Hello Malte,
Just a quick flame to have fun ;)
I see you are doing IPv4 and IPv6 firewall, it is very nice and I'm a
IPv6 supporter as well.
However, before using an IPv6 firewall I'd like to be able to assign
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/5356
I found a little bug and I opened a ticket on the trac.
Regards :)
Saverio Proto
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
This is a quick fix for the HNA-Problem with the 6and4-Mode. I will
hopefully get the time to
rewrite and clean up the complete script in the next weeks. This patch is
for get it working now.
thank you :)
Should the patch be included on the OpenWRT Trac attached to this
ticket:
is there an easy way to compile everything, where compilation errors do
not stop the compilation process?
As manually removing a problem package and manually restarting is
wasting a lot of time.
All compilation errors should be stored in a log so that they can be
checked afterwards.
I know
Use PKG_BUILD_DEPENDS. It works similiar to DEPENDS but is for compile time.
I know that feature but it does not solve my problem.
I have no problem when I do:
make package-name-compile
but I have the problem when I do:
make package-name-install
anyway I found a way out.
When the install
Ehm, I received no answer and I'm stuck with this nasty problem :(
Maybe my explanation was unclear... so I try again:
There is a way to force a package to be installed after another
package when creating the firmware image ?
Thank you
Saverio
___
Hello,
I'm working on some packages [1] for OpenWRT and I run in the following problem:
I have this package ninux-ipkg-brcm that basically writes some
configuration files and modifies some init.d stuff.
The package compiles fine:
make package/feeds/ninux/ninux-ipkg-brcm-compile V=99
But when I
For the past couple of months, I have been marking spam on the wiki on a
daily basis. (look under the username ChadHowell) I would like to take
[..CUT..]
At Ninux.org we had a big problem with spam on wiki.ninux.org. We also
use MoinMoin
After using a captcha for editing the pages _all_ the
I'm wondering why the 8.09 RC1 announcement was not made here. It was
made on the forums at
[..CUT..]
thanks for reporting on mailing list! I never read forums ...
maybe is time also to update the wiki/trac main page:
https://dev.openwrt.org/
*** there is also a 8.09 tag of the packages
*** there is also a 8.09 tag of the packages folder ?? ***
I think this is _VERY_ important!
We decided to not tag packages for 8.09 until we introduce build
system related API changes, so that 8.09 users can keep updating
their packages.
The feeds.conf.default was set up in a way that it
We decided to maintain packages outside of the release cycle, so that
people always get the latest package updates, even when using the
release branch.
Let me tell you this story first :)
At Ninux.org we tried to mantain a meta-package of OpenWRT, that was
supposed to configure the router to
Hello,
sorry if this is strongly off topic
I'm trying to get in touch with the Iperf people
http://dast.nlanr.net/
but their web site is offline since several days (more than 2 weeks)
and also their email contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces emails back to
me.
I have a patch to submit to
Recordings?
If you want to view the presentation later, please go to
http://sc.superbetram.com/archive/
broken link :(
Regards
Saverio Proto
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
This morning I was not able to compile OpenWRT due to this broken link
http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-2.45.tar.gz
any hint where to download this tarball ? Looks like it is no where on
the Internet :(
thanks
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel
This morning I was not able to compile OpenWRT due to this broken link
http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-2.45.tar.gz
Now it works :)
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Here at Ninux.org (Rome) we have been playing with Ath5k and PCMCIA
atheros cards.
Using Linux 2.6.26 and this patch:
http://aquila.netgroup.uniroma2.it/~saverio/patch/ath5k_more_channels.patch
we have cards working at 2.7Ghz
It would be nice to see the Fonera working at that frequency.
I
Hello,
reading the discussion on web interfaces for OpenWRT I got confused about UCI.
Since I have not found any official OpenWRT page that documents UCI,
all this I'm going to say comes from various googling, and hands-on
boards with OpenWRT.
I thought UCI was a way to concentrate all the
Florian, thanks for your answers.
Yes, if you know how to modify madwifi accordingly, ath5k does not work with
the Fonera because the Fonera does use AHB as the interconnection bus between
the CPU and the Wi-Fi core, not PCI.
Oh, I see ... :(
Still, I can work at 2.7Ghz with ath5k with any
Hello,
I found some papers in the Internet that talk about a software called
ART (Atheros radio test).
This tool looks perfect for characterize in the right way the response
in terms of frequency and power of miniPCI cards.
I googled a bit but I found no website of this software... maybe is
not
I can't seem to figure out how to either mount or uncompress the
jffs2 filesystem that is produced by the OpenWRT compile.
I had your same problem some time ago... JFFS2 filesystem can't be
mounted in the obvious way :| You need a further step regarding the
mtd device
Here some good
79 matches
Mail list logo
