Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt userspace git repo location

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On 28 September 2016 at 10:30, Felix Fietkau  wrote:
> [Cc'd lede-dev@]
>
> On 2016-09-28 10:03, Luka Perkov wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 08:46:51AM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>> On 2016-09-28 00:56, Luka Perkov wrote:
>>> > Hi Felix,
>>> >
>>> > it seems there is some divergence from the Git repos hosted on OpenWrt
>>> > site and on LEDE:
>>> >
>>> > http://git.openwrt.org/?p=project/ubus.git;a=summary
>>> > https://git.lede-project.org/?p=project/ubus.git;a=summary
>>> >
>>> > Do you know why is that?
>>> I don't see the divergence there. Care to explain what you mean?
>>
>> The last two commits were not merged. Thanks for merging them in the
>> meantime.
>>
>> As per earlier discussions on #openwrt-devel with Zoltan, the
>> git.openwrt.org trees should have been mirrored from
>> git.lede-project.org, right?
> I don't know if somebody merged those commits manually or why they
> weren't automatically merged in the first place, maybe there was a
> glitch in the automated mirroring setup.
>
>>> > Speaking of this topic I'd like to propose that we host these repos in a
>>> > single location on GitHub under the OpenWrt project here:
>>> >
>>> > https://github.com/openwrt
>>> >
>>> > GitHub proved to be convinient in attracting easier collaboration. I'm
>>> > wondering what the community thinks about this proposal. Thoughts?
>>> For packages that I maintain, I will stick to git.lede-project.org as
>>> the main repo.
>>>
>>> I still find github to be rather cumbersome, and we already had to add
>>> automatic mirroring of some github repos to git.lede-project.org,
>>> because github was being unreliable again.
>>>
>>> I do see the point in enabling github-style collaboration for the main
>>> repo or for package feeds, but not for things like ubus.
>>
>> Well, the whole workflow like - I have decided XYZ in LEDE and I will
>> now (try to) push it in OpenWrt too just because does not make any
>> sense.
> We added the automatic repository mirroring to make things easier for
> OpenWrt, because upstream development of those components is with LEDE now.
> If OpenWrt guys simply want to contribute to the development of these
> components, feel free to send patches to the LEDE list.
> However, OpenWrt wants to fork any of the component packages like ubus,
> please tell us which ones so we can disable automatic mirroring of them.
> It's completely up to you guys.
>
>> Can you elaborate why you do not see a point in enabeling GitHub
>> style collaboration?
> GitHub lowers the entry barrier by enabling people to contribute that
> aren't able (or willing) to adopt the development workflow of sending
> patches to the mailing list. Even though this has somewhat reduced the
> average quality of contributions in practice and made the maintenance
> work more cumbersome for some of us (including me), that was an
> acceptable tradeoff for increasing number of contributions for the main
> repo and packages.
>
> For me personally, the github workflow is quite annoying, but I'm
> willing to accept it in places where the benefits outweigh the costs.
>
> Components like netifd and ubus need more careful review and testing, so
> to me as a maintainer, lowering the entry barrier does not make any sense.
>
> - Felix
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Github has become de facto standard for contributing to open source
projects, so no matter if you hate it or love it, this is just now the
new norm.
Going against the "norm" is seen by potential contributors as building
barriers for contribution.

I'm not a openwrt developer/contributor so I can't speak from that
angle, but as an hardware and software integrator but I have report
numerous bugs and helped developers to track down issues so that they
can fix it faster...

I have seen patches being rejected on mailing lists and after giving
feedback most patches come back with fixed any outstanding issues.
When more people contribute then handling one-time patches becomes
bigger task, but most contributors on github as on mailing lists will
take their code and comments from maintainers and clean it up or fix
it...

So from my outside point of view having userspace openwrt  parts on
github would be a good move for the project...
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introducing "fastpath" - Kernel module for speeding up IP forwarding

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

A long shot, but are there any news from Marvel legal department? Would
sending them a case of good beer solve this? :)

On Sunday, 27 September 2015, Weedy  wrote:

> Did this die?
> On 22 Dec 2014 9:06 am, "Tomer Eliyahu"  > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are software developers, part of Marvell's cellular platform
>> infrastructure team.
>>
>> Our team has been working on a project named "fastpath" for speeding
>> up IP forwarding in embedded systems.
>> The initial version (fastpath v1) has already been successfully
>> deployed in our latest pxa1801 (cellular modem) based products.
>>
>> We are in the final stages of fastpath v2 development, which is
>> completely hardware independent and requires minimal changes in the
>> generic networking code (the project consists of a kernel module and a
>> single kernel patch); despite being hardware independent, fastpath v2
>> already achieved the same level of performance (as fastpath v1) and
>> even increased stability.
>>
>> Our development platform is running openwrt Barrier Breaker (r43694),
>> so naturally we chose to suggest this to the openwrt development
>> community first.
>>
>> You can find a brief description of our fastpath solution below.
>>
>> We are anxious to hear your thoughts/comments and will gladly share the
>> code.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Ram Marzin r...@marvell.com
>> 
>> Tomer Eliyahu tom...@marvell.com
>> 
>>
>>
>> Fastpath in a nutshell
>> --
>>
>> The basic concept of fastpath is to optimize the data-plane while
>> keeping the control-plane in the generic networking stack.
>> This is a known concept in the industry which is commonly used in
>> embedded systems [1], but so far we couldn't find any open source
>> implementation for it.
>>
>> Fast path implements an optimized data-plane, which replaces the
>> generic data-plane forwarding code for selected connections. The
>> data-plane implementation includes a straight forward optimized packet
>> processing engine which handles all the required packet manipulation
>> for IP forwarding, such as decrement ttl/hop count, checksum
>> adjustment, MAC header encapsulation and "dummy NAT" (TCP/UDP traffic
>> which does not carry any L3/L4 information in the packet payload).
>>
>> As noted above, the control-plane is handled by the generic networking
>> stack, with the only exception of learning new connections and marking
>> the valid ones as fastpath - some connections can't participate in
>> fastpath, such as any "non-dummy NAT" connections (e.g. FTP control
>> port), local traffic, and any protocol which is not supported (e.g.
>> IPv6 extensions, IPSec, IPv4 fragmanted packets, etc.).
>> Needless to say that ALL non-fastpath connections / protocols will
>> work as is, i.e. they simply won't go through fastpath.
>>
>> As a rule of thumb, it is safe to assume that in most of the cases,
>> 90% of the data will go through fastpath. In our experiments on
>> pxa1801, fastpath alone *almost doubled* the performance (both
>> Throughput and MIPS consumption) for TCP/UDP IPv4/IPv6 forwarding.
>>
>> References
>> [1]
>> http://www.embedded.com/design/operating-systems/4403058/Accelerating-network-packet-processing-in-Linux
>> ___
>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>> 
>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>>
>
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] New Ubiquiti AC products locked against 3rd party firmware?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Nice that you checked... I would understand this stance from a company
that doesn't rely on so much open source software without which they
wouldn't even exists. Shame, just shame.

On 30 November 2015 at 09:48, John Crispin  wrote:
>
>
> On 30/11/2015 09:38, Petr Štetiar wrote:
>> Ben West  [2015-11-27 10:00:51]:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> This person is reporting a new Ubiquiti AC AP where there the bootloader
>>> does an RSA signature check on the firmware image.
>>
>> let's hope, that it would be possible to replace/patch that unfriendly 
>> U-Boot.
>>
>>> Could anyone else confirm if they've observed the same, and if it now
>>> prevents loading OpenWRT, etc?  Or at least, confirm if the RSA signature
>>> checking by the bootloader was not present before?
>>
>> We're using UBNT products and I can confirm, that there wasn't any RSA
>> firmware signature checking previously and we're able to run OpenWRT on them.
>> Maybe it's time to look around for alternatives...
>>
>> -- ynezz
>>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> i contacted UBNT customer support. they specifically stated that they do
> not want users to install openwrt and prefer not to cooperate with us.
> it is a concious decision to *not* support the free software movement
> and be capitalist pigs. the reasoning given to me was not related to FCC
> ruling but specifically stated that they dont like users installing free
> software on their routers. they prefer to have submissive users that
> will do as they are told.
>
> John
>
>
>>> -- Forwarded message --
>>> From: Andrew Margarit | Cucumber WiFI 
>>> Date: Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 7:59 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [FCC] New AP with the lockdown
>>> To: f...@lists.prplfoundation.org
>>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> Just to let you know, I've been looking at the Ubiquiti new AC APs, and it
>>> looks like they added a RSA check in the bootloader.
>>>
>>> Firmware Version: BZ.qca956x.v3.4.7.3284.150911.1650
>>> RSA Signed Firmware. Verfiying please wait...
>>> Decrypted hash: f8 2b 45 72 9f e4 5f 46 a0 96 43 37 57 4f 49 ab 43 dc 1e 8c
>>> Image hash: f8 2b 45 72 9f e4 5f 46 a0 96 43 37 57 4f 49 ab 43 dc 1e 8c
>>>
>>> All fun and good!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrew Margarit
>>>
>>> Wi-FI Chief | Cucumber Tony
>>> and...@polkaspots.com
>>> cucumberwifi.io
>>>
>>> twitter/cucumbertony
>>> ___
>>> FCC mailing list
>>> f...@lists.prplfoundation.org
>>> http://lists.prplfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fcc
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ben West
>>> http://gowasabi.net
>>> b...@gowasabi.net
>>> 314-246-9434
>>> ___
>>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>> ___
>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>>
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Anyone familiar with RouterBoot? Trying to port board.

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hi David,
did you manage to get OpenWrt up and running on RouterBOARD mAP 2n ?

Cheers,
Valent.

On 28 January 2015 at 02:35, David Hutchison  wrote:
> The problem is there is no yaffs2 filesystem like typical
> RouterBOARD's, it's all one 16mb SPI flash chip.
>
> If it expects kernel, would renaming the .elf file to just "kernel" be
> sufficient? I suppose I could give that a try.
>
> -- Davey
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Soren Harward  wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:56 PM, David Hutchison
>>  wrote:
>>> The problem is when I write the kernel to flash I cannot for the life
>>> of me get RouterBOOT to recognize the kernel.
>>
>> What is the filename of the kernel on the yaffs2 filesystem on the
>> kernel MTD partition?  AFAIK, RouterBoot expects it to be called
>> "kernel".  Not "vmlinux" or "vmlinuz" or
>> "openwrt-ar71xx-generic-vmlinux.elf" or anything else.
>>
>> --
>> Soren Harward
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] alternative for "pyserial+python-mini"

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Just found this --
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/lang/python/files/python-package.mk?rev=13921
-- which suggests that 7 years ago .pyc file creation was turned OFF
for Python.

I can only assume that it was because of the SquashFS issue, so my
question is: Can we precompile Python files at image creation time so
that they can be included in the SquashFS from the beginning. Maybe a
cross-compiling guru can enlighten us?

On 2 July 2015 at 11:25, Alexandru Ardelean  wrote:
> Will make time to update Python :)
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:51 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
>  wrote:
>>
>> Come on guys help me out with Python wiki page, it looks like I know
>> much less about python that you and I'm the only one documenting this
>> which is bad :)
>>
>> Take a look at latest version:
>> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/software/python
>>
>> On 27 June 2015 at 22:42, Christian Mehlis  wrote:
>> > Am 26.06.2015 um 14:57 schrieb valent.turko...@gmail.com:
>> >>
>> >> Does micro-python have some alternative or replacement for pyserial?
>> >
>> >
>> > you can use stty[1] from busybox to configure the tty.
>> > After that every program can use regular read/write calls...
>> >
>> > [1] http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?stty
>> >
>> > Best
>> > Christian
>> >
>> > ___
>> > openwrt-devel mailing list
>> > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>> > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>
>
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Why STA wifi interface shutsdown AP interface?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

> Because there is only one pysical hardware and the hardware can only be
> tuned to one channel. The STA interface needs to look for the channel
> the AP is on and as long as the channel is not determined we can not
> start an AP.

I think that all of us understand limitations of one physical hardware
interface. Still other wifi stack don't disable all interfaces if one
fails.

I would expect that if I set wifi to channel 8 (option channel '8')
that then both AP and STA wifi interfaces use that channel, and it is
know to both of them. If upstream AP for STA is not on channel 8 or
becomes out of range then AP interface still works.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Why STA wifi interface shutsdown AP interface?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

I don't understad how that script even works! Here is the script from
that blog post - http://pastebin.com/ihNAfbcr

Why use wifi-iface[99] ? Who has 100 wifi interfaces? When I manually
run "uci show wireless.@wifi-iface[99]" I get "uci: Entry not found"
as expected.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Why STA wifi interface shutsdown AP interface?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On 15 July 2015 at 12:37, Yaroslav Syrytsia  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is a known issue, some descriptions you can find there - 
> http://vonger.cn/?p=1778
> I guess it is not depend on a driver or hw.

Yaroslav thanks man you saved me lots of headache! :)

>From reading blog post you linked this seams to be more a feature than
bug. Other vendors like Mikrotik for example made their wifi stack so
that virtual wifi interfaces act more like "real" interfaces and
aren't linked.

I actually consider this behaviour as a bug. Why not have 6 different
virtual wifi interfaces each separate from others? How do OpenWrt devs
look at this issue?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Why STA wifi interface shutsdown AP interface?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hi,
Atheros hardware supports multiple wireless interfaces, and ath9k
driver takes advantage of that.

What is not clear to me is why if you have two interfaces, one in sta
mode and other in ap mode then ap interface isn't available until sta
interface is connected to upstream AP.

Why? Is there any way to have multiple wifi intefaces and that they
aren't linked together but that one can work independent of other?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Alternatives do TDMA

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

After some more research I found that FreeBSD recently added TDMA
support to their ath driver [1]. Friend of mine just tried to use it
on some cheap TP-Link device but currently TDMA support is broken but
it will be fixed in next few days.

[1] https://wiki.freebsd.org/dev/ath%284%29
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Alternatives do TDMA

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Sorry for not sending all links at once (some consider it spammy), but
I also see that NETSHe guys extensively tested different size time
slots and did benchmarks and comparisons:
http://netshe.stasoft.net/node/47

And here are their results:
http://netshe.ru/files/doc/en/test_results_28032015.pdf

This seams like a stable and tested TDMA driver which is in
development for around 5 years. Versions prior to stable 1.0 also had
their source posted on UBNT forums (search for NETSHe on Ubiquiti
forums).
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Alternatives do TDMA

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

I have your found out that NETSHe offers some of their firmwares for
free download and testing with TDMA enbled driver:
http://netshe.ru/files/NETSHe-3.0/


On 14 July 2015 at 10:47, valent.turko...@gmail.com
 wrote:
> Sorry to jump in on an older tdma thread, but I found two interesting things.
>
> It looks like  Russian company called NETSHe have made TDMA driver:
> http://www.netshe.ru/files/doc/en/TDMA_brief_en.pdf
> http://www.netshe.ru/tdma
>
> And also there was a intesting job posting for developing TDMA driver
> for cliend in United Arab Emirates:
> https://www.elance.com/j/outdoor-wireless-open-wrt-atheros-development/69183838/?backurl=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZWxhbmNlLmNvbS9yL2pvYnMvcS1vcGVud3J0Lw==
>
> So I guess there are few working implementations out there, but just
> not is open source so far :(
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Alternatives do TDMA

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Sorry to jump in on an older tdma thread, but I found two interesting things.

It looks like  Russian company called NETSHe have made TDMA driver:
http://www.netshe.ru/files/doc/en/TDMA_brief_en.pdf
http://www.netshe.ru/tdma

And also there was a intesting job posting for developing TDMA driver
for cliend in United Arab Emirates:
https://www.elance.com/j/outdoor-wireless-open-wrt-atheros-development/69183838/?backurl=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZWxhbmNlLmNvbS9yL2pvYnMvcS1vcGVud3J0Lw==

So I guess there are few working implementations out there, but just
not is open source so far :(
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Hard float ABI for BCM2708/BCM2709

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Probably no body checked until now if it works and devs went with safe
choice. Just my 2c.

On 11 July 2015 at 18:51, Matthias Schiffer
 wrote:
> Hi,
> I've noticed that OpenWrt currently uses the soft-float ABI in the
> Raspberry Pi images. Is there a specific reason hard float is not used,
> even though most other distributions like Raspbian have switched to it?
>
> I tried adding "fpu" to FEATURES to enable hard-float, and the generated
> images seem to work fine.
>
> Matthias
>
>
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] alternative for "pyserial+python-mini"

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Come on guys help me out with Python wiki page, it looks like I know
much less about python that you and I'm the only one documenting this
which is bad :)

Take a look at latest version:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/software/python

On 27 June 2015 at 22:42, Christian Mehlis  wrote:
> Am 26.06.2015 um 14:57 schrieb valent.turko...@gmail.com:
>>
>> Does micro-python have some alternative or replacement for pyserial?
>
>
> you can use stty[1] from busybox to configure the tty.
> After that every program can use regular read/write calls...
>
> [1] http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?stty
>
> Best
> Christian
>
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] alternative for "pyserial+python-mini"

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On 24 October 2014 at 11:10, Alexandru Ardelean  wrote:
> python-mini is now just python.

Thanks for clarification, I'll add that info on Python OpenWrt Wiki page [1].

I tried installing python package on Caos Calmer rc2 and I get a bunch
of dependencies installed automatically and they use up bunch of
space. I didn't notice that python-mini package installed lots of
dependencies on Barrier Breaker, but I'm not 100% sure.

Was python-mini package on BB python without any dependencies and
python same package but with all added dependencies?

[1] http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/software/python
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] alternative for "pyserial+python-mini"

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Does micro-python have some alternative or replacement for pyserial?

On 31 October 2014 at 08:52, Alexandru Ardelean  wrote:
> python has been moved to Github
> https://github.com/openwrt/packages/tree/master/lang/python
>
> python-mini will be rebooted;
>
> the whole python package needs a bit of revamp/cleanup especially since it's
> been upgraded to version 2.7.8
>
> as for python-smbus and pyserial, someone will have to maintain those;
> otherwise they'll just stay in old packages, while other packages get moved
> to Github
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:05 AM,  wrote:
>>
>> python-smbus/serial depends still on python-mini
>> python and python-mini is missing.
>>
>> ?
>>
>>
>> Am Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:10:32 +0300
>> schrieb Alexandru Ardelean :
>>
>> > python-mini is now just python.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Claudio Thomas
>> >  wrote:
>> >
>> > >  Hi,
>> > > "python-mini" is missing in oldpackages (trunk), is there an
>> > > alternative for "python-mini"?
>> > > I need it for pyserial, which depends on "python-mini", and still
>> > > exists in oldpackages (trunk).
>> > >
>> > > What about "micropython+micropython-lib"?
>> > > Has anyone already tested this as replacement?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Claudio
>> > > --
>> > > Working on OpenWrt BB for XM1700E
>> > > 
>> > >
>> > > ___
>> > > openwrt-devel mailing list
>> > > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>> > > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>> > >
>> > >
>>
>>
>> ___
>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>>
>
>
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ar71xx: add support for tp-link wr740n v5.0 (EU)

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

When will these patched be available in trunk? I have few of these
devices ordered so I can test them once they arrive in few days.

Thanks.

On 21 June 2015 at 22:42, Matthias Schiffer
 wrote:
> On 06/08/2015 05:47 PM, Daniel Petre wrote:
>> TP-Link ships wr740n v5.0 to Romania (so probably everywhere except
>> China) with 4 MB flash and 32 MB memory (confirmed by their local
>> support). This patch adds support for the v5.0 clone of v4, i just
>> tested it on my own v5.0 router and it works.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Petre 
>>
>
> By the way, the same image also works on the WR741ND v5. TP-LINK decided
> to use the same HWID 0x0745 for the 741v5 as well, instead of
> 0x07410005 one might expect. So regarding the software, there isn't any
> difference between 740 and 741 v5.
>
> I think it would make sense to explicitly create images with the name
> tl-wr741nd-v5 even though they will be identical to the tl-wr740n-v5, so
> the images get built when the TLWR741 profile is selected.
>
> I'll provide a patch to do that (as soon as this one has been applied,
> to avoid unnecessary conflicts ;) )
>
> Matthias
>
>
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ar71xx: add support for tp-link wr740n v5.0 (EU)

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Daniel thank you for this patch, we are organising a wifi workshop for
spreading free and open mesh network and without support for these
affordable router we couldn't do it!

So thanks a lot, and thanks a lot to all OpenWrt developers, all of
you guys rock!

On 18 June 2015 at 19:00, Daniel Petre  wrote:
> On 06/18/2015 06:54 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Daniel thank you!
>>  Who will add V5 so
>> it gets build?
>
> OpenWrt developers of course :)
> I tested my little patch, it works.
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Valent.
>>
>> On 8 June 2015 at 17:47, Daniel Petre  wrote:
>>> TP-Link ships wr740n v5.0 to Romania (so probably everywhere except
>>> China) with 4 MB flash and 32 MB memory (confirmed by their local
>>> support). This patch adds support for the v5.0 clone of v4, i just
>>> tested it on my own v5.0 router and it works.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Petre 
>>>
>>> Index: openwrt/target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile
>>> ===
>>> --- openwrt/target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile  (revision 45921)
>>> +++ openwrt/target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile  (working copy)
>>> @@ -443,6 +443,14 @@
>>>  CONSOLE := ttyATH0,115200
>>>  endef
>>>
>>> +define Device/tl-wr740n-v5
>>> +$(Device/tplink-4mlzma)
>>> +BOARDNAME := TL-WR741ND-v4
>>> +DEVICE_PROFILE := TLWR740
>>> +TPLINK_HWID := 0x0745
>>> +CONSOLE := ttyATH0,115200
>>> +endef
>>> +
>>>  define Device/tl-wr741nd-v1
>>>  $(Device/tplink-4m)
>>>  BOARDNAME := TL-WR741ND
>>> @@ -472,7 +480,7 @@
>>>  TPLINK_HWID := 0x07430002
>>>  CONSOLE := ttyATH0,115200
>>>  endef
>>> -TARGET_DEVICES += tl-wr740n-v4 tl-wr741nd-v1 tl-wr741nd-v2
>>> tl-wr741nd-v4 tl-wr743nd-v2
>>> +TARGET_DEVICES += tl-wr740n-v4 tl-wr740n-v5 tl-wr741nd-v1 tl-wr741nd-v2
>>> tl-wr741nd-v4 tl-wr743nd-v2
>>>
>>>  define Device/tl-wr841n-v8
>>>  $(Device/tplink-4mlzma)
>>> ___
>>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ar71xx: add support for tp-link wr740n v5.0 (EU)

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Daniel thank you!

Daniel can you please share firmware you have build so I can join in testing.
I still don't see V5 images being build in trunk. Who will add V5 so
it gets build?

Cheers,
Valent.

On 8 June 2015 at 17:47, Daniel Petre  wrote:
> TP-Link ships wr740n v5.0 to Romania (so probably everywhere except
> China) with 4 MB flash and 32 MB memory (confirmed by their local
> support). This patch adds support for the v5.0 clone of v4, i just
> tested it on my own v5.0 router and it works.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Petre 
>
> Index: openwrt/target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile
> ===
> --- openwrt/target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile  (revision 45921)
> +++ openwrt/target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile  (working copy)
> @@ -443,6 +443,14 @@
>  CONSOLE := ttyATH0,115200
>  endef
>
> +define Device/tl-wr740n-v5
> +$(Device/tplink-4mlzma)
> +BOARDNAME := TL-WR741ND-v4
> +DEVICE_PROFILE := TLWR740
> +TPLINK_HWID := 0x0745
> +CONSOLE := ttyATH0,115200
> +endef
> +
>  define Device/tl-wr741nd-v1
>  $(Device/tplink-4m)
>  BOARDNAME := TL-WR741ND
> @@ -472,7 +480,7 @@
>  TPLINK_HWID := 0x07430002
>  CONSOLE := ttyATH0,115200
>  endef
> -TARGET_DEVICES += tl-wr740n-v4 tl-wr741nd-v1 tl-wr741nd-v2
> tl-wr741nd-v4 tl-wr743nd-v2
> +TARGET_DEVICES += tl-wr740n-v4 tl-wr740n-v5 tl-wr741nd-v1 tl-wr741nd-v2
> tl-wr741nd-v4 tl-wr743nd-v2
>
>  define Device/tl-wr841n-v8
>  $(Device/tplink-4mlzma)
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] downloads.openwrt.org looks down

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

It's not just you! http://downloads.openwrt.org looks down from here

http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/http://downloads.openwrt.org/
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] downloads.openwrt.org looks down

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Found about this mirror so helping to spread the word -
http://bo.mirror.garr.it/pub/1/openwrt/

On 12 June 2015 at 12:29, valent.turko...@gmail.com
 wrote:
> It's not just you! http://downloads.openwrt.org looks down from here
>
> http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/http://downloads.openwrt.org/
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How to track IO usage of internal flash mtd partitions?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Awesome news Sergey,
will this patch be applied to latest trunk anytime soon so that I can test it?

Can you just briefly explain how will it be possible to track erase
block count once this patch is applied?

Regards,
Valent.

On 20 May 2015 at 08:38, Sergey Zakharchenko  wrote:
> Hello Valent,
>
> 2015-05-19 15:52 GMT+03:00 you wrote:
>> Is there maybe something that I have missed or there is no tool for
>> reading IO usage of mtd partitions?
>
> Without kernel support for this, it's not possible. However, yo're
> (possibly) in luck, as we use the following patch in new DLI power
> controllers to do what you probably want to do:
>
> http://sources.digital-loggers.com/patches/openwrt-aa-r42647/mtd_erasecount.patch
>
> It's supposed to work with OpenWrt AA (kernel 3.3). It's distributed
> together with the firmware sources, so consider it's under GPL.
>
> Keep in mind that few care about the write count, it's usually the
> erase count that matters.
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> DoubleF
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How to track IO usage of internal flash mtd partitions?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

> Try dstat. you can select it in the utilities menu.
> http://dag.wiee.rs/home-made/dstat/
>
> Pepe

I tried dstat also, with "dstat -r" and with "dstat --disk-util"
options, nothing.

So far my conclusion is that utilies that works with block devices
can't work with mtd partitions. And other issue is that mtdblock
kernel module doesn't give any statistics so mtdblock partitions show
0 usage with any standard tool that tries to read io statistics from
mtdblock partitions .

Is there maybe something that I have missed or there is no tool for
reading IO usage of mtd partitions?

Is there a way to read IO usage of /overlay jffs2 partition?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How to track IO usage of internal flash mtd partitions?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Looks like iostat only tracks block devices so I can see change for
usb flash device but no change for internal flash partitions :(

# iostat
Linux 3.10.49 (Demo36_Muc (Base9)) 05/18/15 _mips_ (1 CPU)

avg-cpu:  %user   %nice %system %iowait  %steal   %idle
   5.340.001.470.000.00   93.19

Device:tps   Blk_read/s   Blk_wrtn/s   Blk_read   Blk_wrtn
mtdblock0 0.00 0.00 0.00208  0
mtdblock1 0.00 0.00 0.00208  0
mtdblock2 0.00 0.00 0.00208  0
mtdblock3 0.00 0.00 0.00208  0
mtdblock4 0.00 0.04 0.00  12240  0
mtdblock5 0.00 0.00 0.00208  0
mtdblock6 0.00 0.00 0.00208  0
mmcblk0   0.02 0.03 0.21   9786  69721


Any ideas?

On 18 May 2015 at 11:45, José Vázquez  wrote:
> Try iostat (selectable in busybox). Maybe is what are you looking for.
>
> 2015-05-17 0:40 GMT+02:00, valent.turko...@gmail.com
> :
>> Here is some interesting info I found using mtdinfo tool:
>>
>> # mtdinfo /dev/mtd5
>> mtd5
>> Name:   rootfs_data
>> Type:   nor
>> Eraseblock size:65536 bytes, 64.0 KiB
>> Amount of eraseblocks:  104 (6815744 bytes, 6.5 MiB)
>> Minimum input/output unit size: 1 byte
>> Sub-page size:  1 byte
>> Character device major/minor:   90:10
>> Bad blocks are allowed: false
>> Device is writable: true
>>
>> So I see there are 104 eraseblocks on this partition. Interesting so
>> see finaly some numbers. Now how to see how many times these
>> eraseblock were issued "erase eraseblock" command?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How to track IO usage of internal flash mtd partitions?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Here is some interesting info I found using mtdinfo tool:

# mtdinfo /dev/mtd5
mtd5
Name:   rootfs_data
Type:   nor
Eraseblock size:65536 bytes, 64.0 KiB
Amount of eraseblocks:  104 (6815744 bytes, 6.5 MiB)
Minimum input/output unit size: 1 byte
Sub-page size:  1 byte
Character device major/minor:   90:10
Bad blocks are allowed: false
Device is writable: true

So I see there are 104 eraseblocks on this partition. Interesting so
see finaly some numbers. Now how to see how many times these
eraseblock were issued "erase eraseblock" command?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] How to track IO usage of internal flash mtd partitions?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hi,
OpenWrt devices use mtd partitions, but I don't have enough knowledge
on how to track IO activity, especially number of writes.

I know that mtd device isn't a block device, but what confuses me that
I see mtdblock devices also. Do they simulate block device? Why?

I have used iostat but it is not showing any changes on mtdblock5
partition which is mounted as /overlay jffs2 partition on this device
I'm using.

I have also checked stats in /proc/diskstat, and they also only change
for /dev/mmcblk0p1 which is external usb device, but not for any of
mtdblockX partitions.

Can you please point me in the right direction?

Thanks in advance!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Firefly FireWrt - interesting AC1200 beast

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hi,
has anyone got their hands on Firefly FireWrt [1] with Mediatek
MT7621A dual core MIPS 1004Kc processor?

Specs look really interesting, but my concern is wifi driver maturity
and general reliability. Any comments on reliability of Mediatek
platform?

I haven't had experience with and device using Mediatek SoC so any
insights are appreciated.

Also there is currently a Beta program open so you can get demo board
for 69$ [2], I'm sure they will gladly send these boards to OpenWrt
devs.

[1] 
http://www.cnx-software.com/2015/05/14/firewrt-is-an-openwrt-802-11ac-board-powered-by-mediatek-mt7621a-processor/
[2] http://bbs.t-firefly.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=543
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Is PPPoE broken in Barrier Breaker?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hahahaha, I'm so embarrassed :) And thank you very, very much!

On 25 March 2015 at 12:23, Yousong Zhou  wrote:
 Here is a link to this issue on the forum (it is not only me):
 https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=269850

 It looks like pppd after sending request for IP address instead
 getting response with IP data instead  package to terminate LCP is
 received. Does somebody have ideas why is this happening?

>>>
>>> I think the following line in that post more relevant here.
>>>
>>> rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1   ]
>>> No auth is possible
>>>
>>> You may want to know the arguments passed to pppd on the command line
>>> with `ps ww | grep pppd`.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> yousong
>>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks, I didn't mention but current ppp options are:
>>
>> # cat /etc/ppp/options
>> debug
>> logfile /tmp/ppp
>> noipdefault
>> defaultroute
>> noaccomp
>> nopcomp
>> nocrtscts
>> lock
>> maxfail 0
>> lcp-echo-failure 15
>> lcp-echo-interval 30
>> lcp-restart 25
>> pap-restart 25
>>
>> and pppd starts with:
>> /usr/sbin/pppd nodetach ipparam ppp0 ifname pppoe-ppp0 nodefaultroute
>> usepeerdns persist maxfail 1 ip-up-script /lib/netifd/ppp-up
>> ipv6-up-script /lib/netifd/ppp-up ip-down-script /lib/netifd/ppp-dow
>
> No username or password is present on the command line.  I Just saw
> your update on the forum post.  You need to specify username with the
> option "username", not "user".  That should be it.
>
> Cheers.
>
> yousong
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Is PPPoE broken in Barrier Breaker?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On 25 March 2015 at 08:31, Yousong Zhou  wrote:
> On 25 March 2015 at 14:21, valent.turko...@gmail.com
>  wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I don't see lots of people using PPPoE with OpenWrt, at least PPPoE is
>> not mentioned much on forums.
>>
>> My first opportunity to use PPPoE with OpenWrt was yesterday and I
>> lost few hours on troubleshooting few issues and finally arrived at
>> conclusion that PPPoE could be broken in Barrier Breaker.
>>
>> I'm not 100% sure if it is broken so I came here to ask if there are
>> people who have success with PPPoE on OpenWrt?
>>
>
> PPPoE with CHAP authentication works for me.
>
>> Here is a link to this issue on the forum (it is not only me):
>> https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=269850
>>
>> It looks like pppd after sending request for IP address instead
>> getting response with IP data instead  package to terminate LCP is
>> received. Does somebody have ideas why is this happening?
>>
>
> I think the following line in that post more relevant here.
>
> rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1   ]
> No auth is possible
>
> You may want to know the arguments passed to pppd on the command line
> with `ps ww | grep pppd`.
>
> Cheers,
>
> yousong
>


Thanks, I didn't mention but current ppp options are:

# cat /etc/ppp/options
debug
logfile /tmp/ppp
noipdefault
defaultroute
noaccomp
nopcomp
nocrtscts
lock
maxfail 0
lcp-echo-failure 15
lcp-echo-interval 30
lcp-restart 25
pap-restart 25

and pppd starts with:
/usr/sbin/pppd nodetach ipparam ppp0 ifname pppoe-ppp0 nodefaultroute
usepeerdns persist maxfail 1 ip-up-script /lib/netifd/ppp-up
ipv6-up-script /lib/netifd/ppp-up ip-down-script /lib/netifd/ppp-dow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Is PPPoE broken in Barrier Breaker?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hi,
I don't see lots of people using PPPoE with OpenWrt, at least PPPoE is
not mentioned much on forums.

My first opportunity to use PPPoE with OpenWrt was yesterday and I
lost few hours on troubleshooting few issues and finally arrived at
conclusion that PPPoE could be broken in Barrier Breaker.

I'm not 100% sure if it is broken so I came here to ask if there are
people who have success with PPPoE on OpenWrt?

Here is a link to this issue on the forum (it is not only me):
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=269850

It looks like pppd after sending request for IP address instead
getting response with IP data instead  package to terminate LCP is
received. Does somebody have ideas why is this happening?

Cheers,
Valent.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Multiple OpenWrt devices collectively managed?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

After reading comments from all of you I thought of deploying
additional devices just as wifi analyzers, as few of you suggested. I
have used kismet before, but only as standalone wifi scanner, but
there is also an option to deploy kismet-drones and monitor multiple
endpoints from central kismet server.

That could probably work if you can get alerts from kismet when some
channel starts to have lots more traffic than it used to have and then
take action if necessary to modify your node's channels. Any thoughts
on this approach?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Multiple OpenWrt devices collectively managed?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On 22 March 2015 at 10:01, Outback Dingo  wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:33 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
>  wrote:
>>
>> On 21 March 2015 at 15:49, Janne Cederberg 
>> wrote:
>> > Greetings all!
>> > Been searching around and found for example OpenWISP but thought I'd
>> > ask the list as well: is there some opensource management software for
>> > OpenWrt that could control a set of multiple OpenWrt AP's on the same
>> > SSID; so basically controlling their channels based on channel use and
>> > actively avoiding crowded/DOS'sed channels for example?
>> >
>> > Best regards, Janne Cederberg
>>
>> Hi Janne,
>> what you are asking for is quite custom piece of software so there is
>> not any open source project with functionality that you ask for.
>>
>> But it is not too difficult to build something like that, try building
>> it yourself and share it with others, or hire somebody to do it for
>> you.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Valent.
>
>
>
> Thats actually not true, there are numerous implementations of dashboard
> management solution for openwrt based routers running mesh, Ive been running
> a dashboard
> for well over 6 years now on a large scale wireless deployment.
>
> just research openwrt wireless mesh dashboard

Please give some examples because I'm also really interested in any if
they exist.

I know of Nodewatcher [1], which is actively developed, and soon will
have V3.0 release which will be easily deployable by anybody to create
community mesh network, but currently it is missing lots of UI
elements.

I also found out that there is Afrimesh [2], but last commit was in
2011 so it looks like a dead project :( If anybody has used is please
share your experience.

There are quite a few commercial dashboards like Open-Mesh [3] but you
also need to buy their hardware AFAIK...

So if there are other dashboard projects that are usable please share them.

[1] https://dev.wlan-si.net/wiki/Nodewatcher
[2] https://code.google.com/p/afrimesh/
[3] http://www.open-mesh.com/
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Multiple OpenWrt devices collectively managed?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On 21 March 2015 at 15:49, Janne Cederberg  wrote:
> Greetings all!
> Been searching around and found for example OpenWISP but thought I'd
> ask the list as well: is there some opensource management software for
> OpenWrt that could control a set of multiple OpenWrt AP's on the same
> SSID; so basically controlling their channels based on channel use and
> actively avoiding crowded/DOS'sed channels for example?
>
> Best regards, Janne Cederberg

Hi Janne,
what you are asking for is quite custom piece of software so there is
not any open source project with functionality that you ask for.

But it is not too difficult to build something like that, try building
it yourself and share it with others, or hire somebody to do it for
you.

Cheers,
Valent.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Why OpenWrt sucks?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On 10 March 2015 at 21:26, Gergely Kiss  wrote:
> Hi Valent,
>
> first of all, I strongly disagree with people claiming that OpenWrt sucks
> because it doesn't. For me it rather looks like a well-maintained, rapidly
> improving project with a great number of actively supported hardware and
> quite a few people contributing to



> Do you think OpenWrt sucks? Then stop complaining and do something to make
> it better. It's that simple.
>
> Cheers,
> Gergely

Hi Gergely,
thanks for your reply and for your contribution to OpenWrt. But I have
to ask - have you read my message apart from headline? If you have
read it you will see that I'm defending OpenWrt and I definitely don't
think it sucks!

I contribute to it everyday, but not (yet) as a developer but as
advanced user, forum and wiki contributor and have organized multiple
workshops all accross Croatia, Serbia and Macedonia to get people to
use OpenWrt.

Cheers,
Valent.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Interesting OpenWrt and Atheros job listing

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hi,
just stumbled upon this interesting job listing that is appropriate
for people on this list:

https://www.elance.com/j/outdoor-wireless-open-wrt-atheros-development/69183838/?backurl=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZWxhbmNlLmNvbS9yL2pvYnMvcS1vcGVud3J0Lw==

Hope somebody of you guys gets this and also that we get open source
TDMA support, that would be awesome!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Why OpenWrt sucks?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

> This is a long way of saying, that if performance sucks on OpenWrt you
> should blame Atheros and Broadcom for not giving you (OpenWrt
> community) high quality open source drivers!

First thanks to Alex, Charlie, Kathy and Fernando for pointing out
that Atheros works together with Linux and OpenWrt developers and that
they are very valued member of the community. I agree with you 100%,
we should value all members that contribute to supporting open source.

>From my own hands-on experience with Ubiquiti, Mikrotik, TPLink and
other devices that are based on Atheros is that they usually have
better performance with stock firmware. Also killer feature for some
wifi applications is TDMA protocol, which Ubiquiti, Mikrotik and other
device manufacturers support but OpenWrt doesn't support (but this is
completely different topic).

I knew that Atheros contributed to open source drivers, but there are
lots of reviews and benchmarks that show how much performance
difference there is between some (not all) devices when running
OpenWrt.

Our brains are wired for comparison, so they automatically attribute
labels like "bad", "worse", "slower", "not as good as original" when
using OpenWrt - I have seen this too many times on forums to give you
few specific links to discussions, just dive into forums and you will
see this for yourselves.

I understand some reasons for part of performance hit and I can live
with that. But I also know that performance could be improved because
companies that produce open source drivers don't have best possible
OpenWrt performance as their top priority. Top managers in most
companies don't believe that having best possible performance in
OpenWrt (and allocating enough engineer hours for that task) will make
them more money. Simple as that.

In contrast to this - other companies like Linksys, Mikrotik,
Ubiquiti, TPLink and others that have wifi products definitely give
top priority to how much performance they can sqeeze out of their
devices, and allocate enough engineer hours to make their performance
as fast as possible. Unfortunately they value their closed source
driver.

Can anyone explain to me how NDAs come into this? Because I remember
one discussions with Mikrotik developer who said that they can't
release their Atheros driver that they developed as open source
because they signed NDA with Atheros?

Is Atheros giving some "secret" and proprietary information to
companies that sign NDA with them? If this is true then we will never
have as fast performance as companies that sign NDAs.

v.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Why OpenWrt sucks?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On 10 March 2015 at 02:52, Michael Richardson  wrote:
>
> valent.turko...@gmail.com  wrote:
> > Why it OpenWrt slower than stock firmware? I can help by shining a bit
> > of light onto this subject. I'm developing custom firwmares based on
>
> I'm curious about this claim to begin with.
> Of the people who say this, how many of them actually know how to measure
> such a thing?

Not many, but there are enough skilled people on OpenWrt forums. Skill
is not biggest filter but willingness to write a forum post. I know
quite a few people who are skilled enough to do the tests, but none of
them would write it up as a forum post and share this info with
others. Why? They probably don't care enough and about OpenWrt forum
community.

Here is one example of good test, it is for TPLink Archer C7 (Atheros)
which with stock firmware get's much better results than with OpenWrt
- https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=53703 so judge for
yourself if tests are done correctly. Maybe write up a wiki page for
instructions how to properly compare OpenWrt and stock firmware?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Why OpenWrt sucks?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hi all,
I see this or similar question of forums all the time and I have
answered it few times. I suggest we open a wiki page and contribute an
answer.

Here is how I usually reply to similar questions, please give your
comments in your replies:


Why it OpenWrt slower than stock firmware? I can help by shining a bit
of light onto this subject. I'm developing custom firwmares based on
OpenWrt but I'm not OpenWrt developer, still as I have few years of
experience with OpenWrt I can explain why sometimes performance sucks
or there are some issues and bugs.

OpenWrt has three main parts; linux kernel, software packages and
wireless drivers. OpenWrt developers work on all of them. Consider the
amount of code this is, and consider that all work is done by a
handful of OpenWrt developers. If you work in software industry you
know many people big companies hire to work on much smaller projects.
So be thankful it works as good as it does, it is actually a miracle
that it works as good as it does

Main issue is that wifi chip manufacturers don't offer open source
wifi drivers. If Atheros and Broadcom understood Open source as Intel
does then you would get absolutely top speed and reliability from
OpenWrt wifi drivers. You don't get top notch performance with OpenWrt
because Atheros and Broadcom are choosing not release quality open
source drivers.

Linux, BSDx and OpenWrt developers can only use other means to get
wifi devices to work, usually reverse engineering, and without support
from wifi chip companies it is not easy to support all features, get
awesome performance and stability.

This is a long way of saying, that if performance sucks on OpenWrt you
should blame Atheros and Broadcom for not giving you (OpenWrt
community) high quality open source drivers!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Wiki upload rights

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Who is Mediawiki admin? Somebody was messing about media namespaces and
blocked some namespaces so that they don't have permission to accept
uploaded images.

For example "toh:tplink" namespace - http://i.imgur.com/quWSV4L.png

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:00 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hmm, it looks like when I'm editing wiki page then probably I'm in "root"
> folder and there I don't have permissions to upload images, but then I
> choose from my account page to upload to some other folder I can upload.
>
> Check out screenshots:
> http://i.imgur.com/RbIxKsG.png
> http://i.imgur.com/tz51VHE.png
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 9:56 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
> valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Any ideas why is this happening with my account? Can you please check
>> user rights for wiki account "valentt"
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:15 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
>> valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Well, it is strange, but check out this message:
>>> http://i.imgur.com/2NbQBxc.png
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> upload should be possible for any registered user within the media
>>>> namespace.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ~ Jow
>>>> ___
>>>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Wiki upload rights

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hmm, it looks like when I'm editing wiki page then probably I'm in "root"
folder and there I don't have permissions to upload images, but then I
choose from my account page to upload to some other folder I can upload.

Check out screenshots:
http://i.imgur.com/RbIxKsG.png
http://i.imgur.com/tz51VHE.png

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 9:56 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Any ideas why is this happening with my account? Can you please check user
> rights for wiki account "valentt"
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:15 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
> valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Well, it is strange, but check out this message:
>> http://i.imgur.com/2NbQBxc.png
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> upload should be possible for any registered user within the media
>>> namespace.
>>>
>>>
>>> ~ Jow
>>> ___
>>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Wiki upload rights

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Any ideas why is this happening with my account? Can you please check user
rights for wiki account "valentt"

Thanks.

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:15 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, it is strange, but check out this message:
> http://i.imgur.com/2NbQBxc.png
>
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> upload should be possible for any registered user within the media
>> namespace.
>>
>>
>> ~ Jow
>> ___
>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>>
>
>
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Wiki upload rights

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Well, it is strange, but check out this message:
http://i.imgur.com/2NbQBxc.png

On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> upload should be possible for any registered user within the media
> namespace.
>
>
> ~ Jow
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Is Linksys/Belkin lying (again) about being open source (WRT1200AC router) ?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Linksys/Belking marketing is again doing one thing and saying another?

This time they say that WRT1200AC router is open source:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/ces-2015-linksys-1200ac-an-inexpensive-open-source-802-11ac-wi-fi-router/

I have tracked progress with WRT1900AC and saw how they failed to give us
open source driver, so I hope that this time they will actually keep their
(marketing) promise.

I really, really, really hope that this time they have reached out and
contacted any of you OpenWrt developers and that we will get truly open
source driver from them.

So please let us know if any of you have heard anything regarding WRT1200AC
router and it's drivers.

Cheers,
Valent.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] imagebuilder "no valid architecture" and "incompatible with the architectures" errors

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

I have resorted to building docker image with openwrt imagebuilder and all
necessary tools in order to make this issue go away and to make building
images portable and reproducable.

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:12 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Nobody is seeing these kind of messages?
>
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
> valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> after downloading and unpacking ImageBuilder 14.07 on Lenovo T440s
>> running Fedora 21 I get "no valid architecture" errors.
>>
>> But if I download same ImageBuilder file on my vps build process works
>> without errors, why?
>>
>> Here is full log: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=rQUHNkfe
>>
>> and here is a snippet:
>>
>> # make image PROFILE=WNDR3600
>>
>> Package luci version 0.12+svn-r10530-1 has no valid architecture,
>> ignoring.
>> Unknown package 'libc'.
>> Collected errors:
>>  * pkg_hash_fetch_best_installation_candidate: Packages for libc found,
>> but incompatible with the architectures configured
>>  * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package libc.
>>
>>
>>
>
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] imagebuilder "no valid architecture" and "incompatible with the architectures" errors

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Nobody is seeing these kind of messages?

On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> after downloading and unpacking ImageBuilder 14.07 on Lenovo T440s running
> Fedora 21 I get "no valid architecture" errors.
>
> But if I download same ImageBuilder file on my vps build process works
> without errors, why?
>
> Here is full log: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=rQUHNkfe
>
> and here is a snippet:
>
> # make image PROFILE=WNDR3600
>
> Package luci version 0.12+svn-r10530-1 has no valid architecture, ignoring.
> Unknown package 'libc'.
> Collected errors:
>  * pkg_hash_fetch_best_installation_candidate: Packages for libc found,
> but incompatible with the architectures configured
>  * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package libc.
>
>
>
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] imagebuilder "no valid architecture" and "incompatible with the architectures" errors

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hi,
after downloading and unpacking ImageBuilder 14.07 on Lenovo T440s running
Fedora 21 I get "no valid architecture" errors.

But if I download same ImageBuilder file on my vps build process works
without errors, why?

Here is full log: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=rQUHNkfe

and here is a snippet:

# make image PROFILE=WNDR3600

Package luci version 0.12+svn-r10530-1 has no valid architecture, ignoring.
Unknown package 'libc'.
Collected errors:
 * pkg_hash_fetch_best_installation_candidate: Packages for libc found, but
incompatible with the architectures configured
 * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package libc.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Wiki upload rights

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hi,
wiki admins please enable upload rights for "valentt" account so that I can
continue contributing to wiki.

Thanks,
Valent.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Lots of missing packages!

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Thanks!

I guess I'm used to doing it the old way and usually documentation is
quite lagging and I usually update old info on the wiki all the
time... Thanks once more!

On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Matthias Strubel
 wrote:
> On 10/18/2014 08:45 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Steven Barth  wrote:
>>> Please see https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=52219
>>>
>>
>>
>> Because of this decission ImageBuilder is now completely useless in
>> Barrier Breaker 14.07. I tried building new image with few extra
>> packages but they aren't included in ImageBuilder archive, and I got
>> this message:
>>
>> Collected errors:
>>  * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package nano.
>>  * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package netcat.
>>  * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package openvpn.
>>  * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package tmux.
>>
>> So you are telling us thate tere are no maintainers for nano, netcat,
>> openvpn and tmux packages and that is why you remoded them from
>> ImageBuilder? Are these packages broken or just unmaintained? If they
>> aren't broken please include them back into ImageBuilder.
>> ___
>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> I think you can add those additional "repositories" to the repository.conf in 
> the extracted ImageBuilder folder.
> For BB, this should look like:
>
> src/gz barrier_breaker_base 
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/ar71xx/generic/packages/base
> src/gz barrier_breaker_luci 
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/ar71xx/generic/packages/luci
> src/gz barrier_breaker_management 
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/ar71xx/generic/packages/management
> src/gz barrier_breaker_oldpackages 
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/ar71xx/generic/packages/oldpackages
> src/gz barrier_breaker_packages 
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/ar71xx/generic/packages/packages
> src/gz barrier_breaker_routing 
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/ar71xx/generic/packages/routing
> src/gz barrier_breaker_telephony 
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/ar71xx/generic/packages/telephony
>
> Then, the build tool / opkg starts to lookup the requested packages in the 
> other repositories and fetches them automatically.
>
> BTW: That is already documented in: 
> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/obtain.firmware.generate#usage
>
>
> Hope that helps,
> best regards
>
> Matthias
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Lots of missing packages!

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Steven Barth  wrote:
> Please see https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=52219
>


Because of this decission ImageBuilder is now completely useless in
Barrier Breaker 14.07. I tried building new image with few extra
packages but they aren't included in ImageBuilder archive, and I got
this message:

Collected errors:
 * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package nano.
 * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package netcat.
 * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package openvpn.
 * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package tmux.

So you are telling us thate tere are no maintainers for nano, netcat,
openvpn and tmux packages and that is why you remoded them from
ImageBuilder? Are these packages broken or just unmaintained? If they
aren't broken please include them back into ImageBuilder.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] toolchain size increase - 40MB vs 160MB

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hmm, I just noticed that BB RC3 has enormus toolchain file for mips (the
one I use most often) [1] when compared to AA 12.09 toolchain [2]

40MB vs 160MB

Should I be worried that something is broken or is this quadruple size
increase planed?


[1]
http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07-rc3/ar71xx/generic/OpenWrt-Toolchain-ar71xx-for-mips_34kc-gcc-4.8-linaro_uClibc-0.9.33.2.tar.bz2

[2]
http://downloads.openwrt.org/attitude_adjustment/12.09/ar71xx/generic/OpenWrt-Toolchain-ar71xx-for-mips_r2-gcc-4.6-linaro_uClibc-0.9.33.2.tar.bz2
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [ANN] MicroPython - well-known scripting language, unbloated

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

I'll definitely give cross-compiling for mips architecture (I have
lots of AR9331 based routers around) a go and let you know how it
worked out, or if it didn't work out.

Does MicryPython have support for serial communication as Python has
with PySerial? What I mostly need is some simple communication back
and forth with different serial based devices, like bluetooth modules
and such.

Cheers,
Valent.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Moving all feeds to OpenWrt GitHub organisation

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Etienne Champetier
 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The interest of GitHub is that it's simpler for new comer
> I really think mailing list + patchwork is the way to go for the base/core
> part of OpenWrt
>
> What would be the advantage of GitHub for you Valent?

I'm definitely a newcomer and have not sent any patch so far, so can't
compare the two. But I have used github for sending few patches to
other different projects, and not learning a different way of sending
patches is definitely a big plus.
Also my current and future employers can more easily see what I was
doing to assess my skills, or lack of them :)
Just my 2c.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Lots of missing packages!

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Martin Babutzka
 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think there is some confusion about manual building and the Imagebuilder. At
> least in my case the RC3 Image Builder reacts to the feeds-script like that:
> ./scripts/feeds update
> Unable to open feeds configuration at ./scripts/feeds line 40.
>
> Concerning the missing packages in the Image Builder RC3: You can fix that by
> manually downloading the missing packages to the "packages" directory from
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07-rc3/ .../.../packages
>
> At least this worked for me with the nano package.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin

Yes, this is exactly what I did for all missing packages, just dropped
them into packages/ folder in ImageBuilder and then packages got
picked up and got integrated info final OpenWrt firmware I was
building.

The issues I was raising that if these packages are now being build
they should also be present in ImageBuilder package, right?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Lots of missing packages!

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

I just installed Barrier Breaker RC3 and opkg snows that nano,
picocom, python, tmux and few others I complained about are available!
Whom do I need to buy a case of beer? It looks like they are all
available via standard package repo.

But if I try to build image via ImageBuilder these packages still
aren't included with ImageBuilder for BB rc3.

I thught that all packages that are available in openwrt repo are also
packages with ImageBuilder. So why are they missing?

Cheers,
Valent.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Lots of missing packages!

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:07 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
 wrote:
> I used Imagebuilder from 2013-11 to build custom OpenWrt firmware for
> Carambola 2 ar71xx based devices.
>
> Today I saw that BB 14.07 RC2 has been released so I tried it, and was
> chocked that so many of CRUCIAL packages are missing!
>
> I immediately opened new bug:
> https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/17496
>
> These are packages that I found missing;  bluez-libs, bluez-utils,
> coreutils,  coreutils-stat, coreutils-stty, coreutils-timeout, glib2,
> i2c-tools, nano, ntpclient, picocom, python, tmux.
>
> But then I also tested latest trunk and saw that it is also missing
> some packages, not so many as BB-14.07-RC2 but also few of them are
> critical for my custom firmware. Also bug opened:
> https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/17497
>
> I saw that you have decided to make a big change to how packages are
> handled, but is there a there a trunk version Imagebuilder for ar71xx
> PREVIOUS to these changes? I really, really, really need it. And AA is
> not good for me because it has some bugs that trunk version has fixed.
>
> Cheers,
> Valent.

I looked in developement list archive but couldn't find a discussion
in which this decision was made to drop lots of packages. Please point
me to this discussion.

Why is python package missing?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Moving all feeds to OpenWrt GitHub organisation

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Mirko Vogt  wrote:
> On 08/12/2014 08:41 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Please consider switching from svn to git, and then if possible
>> connecting openwrt git with github so patches are synced between them.
>
> http://git.openwrt.org/
>
>> Thanks.
>
> Welcome.

I know about git.openwrt.org and user it regularly, but how are svn
and and git connected? Does current setup allow git.openwrt.org to be
synced and connected to github?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Moving all feeds to OpenWrt GitHub organisation

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Please consider switching from svn to git, and then if possible
connecting openwrt git with github so patches are synced between them.

Thanks.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] edgerouter lite vs openwrt

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Am I reading the OpenSSL benchmark table correctly?!? There is an
entry for Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite (e100) but not for OpenWrt but
OpenSSL benchmark with EdgeOS 1.1.0 and it gives over 100MB/s for
SHA256 WITHOUT hardware encryption!!! What kind of sorcery is this?
:)))

This device is a MONSTER. MUST BUY IT ASAP :)

Please somebody do OpenWrt benchmark also.

http://wiki.openwrt.org/inbox/benchmark.openssl
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Squirrel instead of Lua?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

>
> Yes, definitely. But based on the above experience, as soon as I heard
> about MicroPython project, I put on hold any Squirrel activity, instead
> motivating MicroPython author to release it as OpenSource sooner rather
> than latter, and since the code was released, I'm fervently hacking on
> it instead. Python has active and wide community, and MicroPython is
> pretty good technically. So, if you're interested in good, unbloated
> high-level language, please consider looking at MicroPython - I now
> posted an announcement in separate thread.

Paul thanks for the info regarding MicroPython. Is there maybe a
OpenWrt package already available? How did you use it on OpenWrt, was
it hard to crosscompile? Mos of devices I use are mips based (ar71xx)
and would like to use MicroPython on these devices.

Cheers,
Valent.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Barrier Breaker 14.07-rc2

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Nice news for this new release. I wanted to try it out and give you
feedback but can't even build image because of missing packages.
These are packages I can't do without:
bluez-libs, bluez-utils, coreutils, coreutils-stat, coreutils-stty,
coreutils-timeout, glib2, i2c-tools, nano, ntpclient, picocom, python,
tmux.


I have opened bug report: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/17496

There are probably a ton more missing packages. Will they be returned
back? For me all the strength of OpenWrt is in it's diverse collection
of packages. If I didn't care for additional functionality I would be
using DDWRT. Please don't make me use DDWRT, I really hate it.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Lots of missing packages!

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

I used Imagebuilder from 2013-11 to build custom OpenWrt firmware for
Carambola 2 ar71xx based devices.

Today I saw that BB 14.07 RC2 has been released so I tried it, and was
chocked that so many of CRUCIAL packages are missing!

I immediately opened new bug:
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/17496

These are packages that I found missing;  bluez-libs, bluez-utils,
coreutils,  coreutils-stat, coreutils-stty, coreutils-timeout, glib2,
i2c-tools, nano, ntpclient, picocom, python, tmux.

But then I also tested latest trunk and saw that it is also missing
some packages, not so many as BB-14.07-RC2 but also few of them are
critical for my custom firmware. Also bug opened:
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/17497

I saw that you have decided to make a big change to how packages are
handled, but is there a there a trunk version Imagebuilder for ar71xx
PREVIOUS to these changes? I really, really, really need it. And AA is
not good for me because it has some bugs that trunk version has fixed.

Cheers,
Valent.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Picocom should be re-included in packages.

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Yes please, this is very crutial tool to all of us who use serial
connections! I use ti all the time to troubleshoot and configure
bluetooth serial modules (HC-05).

I just use it with this command "picocom -b 38400 -c /dev/ttyATH0"
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Squirrel instead of Lua?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hi devs,
after listening to Amp Hour podcast ep 202 [1], interview With Brandon
Harris from Electric Imp, which was impressive I heard something
really alarming.

Whey were using Lua in their product previous to launch, but they were
so strongly againgst shipping it with Lua because they realized that
it would hold them down too much that they scrapped EVERYTHING one
week before shipping and started looking for a better alternative.

They found Squirrel [2], so first question that popped into my mind
was - is there Squirrel for OpenWrt. And from what I have seen so far
there is not.

Has anybody used Squirrel? Would it make sense to look into it and
would it be benificial to OpenWrt as a project to also switch from Lua
to Squirrel?

My sense is that it is not that critical because OpenWrt hardvare is
so limited as one used by Electric Imp, but still it would be nice to
have a more optimal language so that OpenWrt can ce used more in
Internet Of Things arena...

Cheers,
Valent.

[1] 
http://www.theamphour.com/202-an-interview-with-brandon-harris-impish-internet-iamatology/
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squirrel_%28programming_language%29
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Ubiquiti Nanobeam

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Just found out that Nanobeam uses AR9342. From what I remember there
were few devices on Wiki that support OpenWrt and have AR9342 SoC.
Can't confirm right now because Wiki is down. Ngnix error just keep
popping up.
There is also a ticket open - https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/16796
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Ubiquiti Nanobeam

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:06 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
 wrote:
> Hi,
> did anybody get their hands on Ubiquiti Nanobeam equipment? Nanobeam is very
> similar to Nanobridge but it has improved radio and antenna design, and
> faster cpu.
>
> Guys on the Ubiquiti forums are really stoked about how great they work:
> http://community.ubnt.com/t5/Installation-Troubleshooting/NanoBeam-vs-NanoBridge/td-p/687967
>
> If anybody has started working on supporting OpenWrt on these devices please
> let me know and if I can help in any way.
>
> Cheers,
> Valent.

I'll be getting pair of Nanobeam devices really soon, is there anybody
willing to mentor me? We are a community wifi project so can't pay
bounty for this, but adding more device that support OpenWrt benefits
everybody.

Cheers,
Valent.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Telephone support (FXO/FXS) via SLIC on AR9331 ?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

I have looked mailing list archive, on OpenWrt forums and on wiki for
information how to get support for SLIC (FXO/FXS) PCM telecom
interface that AR9331 has but is not supported currently in OpenWrt.

I have found this wiki page that has some info about SLIC, but I can't
find who the author is:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/evaluation.boards/pb44?s[]=slic

Having telephone support via AR9331 would make a really big difference
for all of us who work on community mesh networks like:
http://freifunk.net/
https://wlan-si.net/en/
http://www.otvorenamreza.org/
http://villagetelco.org/ and many others...

Thank you in advance.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Support for Nanostation M2 devices

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

I got a batch of 10 Nanostation loco M2 devices produced in 2014 and I
can confirm that they run OpenWrt without problem.

I have updated OpenWrt Wiki with all information I have found out so far:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/ubiquiti/nanostationm2

Thank you all for your information and sorry for the noise on the list.

Cheers,
Valent.

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:28 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
 wrote:
> Another confirmation that they have switched boards and probably also
> SoC, from Ubnt forums:
> https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-General-Discussion/Differencens-between-XM-XW-and-TI-firmwares/td-p/752296/page/2
>
> So nobody from dev team has worked on these new Ubiquiti devices?



-- 
follow me - www.twitter.com/valentt & http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com
linux, anime, spirituality, wireless, scuba, linuxmce smart home, zwave
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent.turko...@hotmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Nanostation M2 - does it have a new soc chip from 2014?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

I got a batch of 10 Nanostation loco M2 devices and can confim that they
run OpenWrt without problem.

I have updated OpenWrt Wiki with all information I have found out so far:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/ubiquiti/nanostationm2


On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Moses F  wrote:

>   ## Please do not write below this line ##
>
> Your request (115726) has been updated. You can add a comment by replying
> to this email.
>
>  *Moses F.* (Ubiquiti Networks)
>
> Jun 04 15:35
>
> Hi Valent,
>
> Thanks for you patience.
>
> Here is the information you are looking for: The new firmware "xw" runs on
> the following board (except Rocket ti).
>
> system type : Atheros AR934x
> cpu model : MIPS 74Kc V4.12
>
> Hope that's helpful. If you have any other questions, please let us know!
>
> I'm setting this ticket to solved for now, but if you have any additional
> questions, feel free to reply to this email at any time and it'll
> automatically reopen the ticket.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Moses F.
> Ubiquiti Networks
>
>*Moses F.* (Ubiquiti Networks)
>
> Jun 03 17:50
>
> Hi Valent,
>
> The NanoStationM2 still runs on the older board. That's the reason there
> is no XW firmware.
>
> I'm still awaiting the information regarding the newer motherboard.
>
> Thanks for your patience!
>
> Moses F.
> Ubiquiti Networks
>
>*valent.turkovic*
>
> Jun 03 11:41
>
> Hi Mozes,
> I'm also looking at Nanostation M2 download page:
> http://www.ubnt.com/download#NanoStation:M2
>
> And here only XM AirOS image is listed, there is no XV image like on
> Nanostation M5 download page:
> http://www.ubnt.com/download#NanoStation:M5
>
> Why?
>
>  *valent.turkovic*
>
> Jun 03 05:47
>
> Thanks for confirming that Nanostatio Loco M2 devices have changed.
> From what I saw it looks like you have changed SoC (main chip). From
> what I found out so far it looks like old chip was ar724x and new one
> is ar934x
>
> This is a really SIGNIFICANT change!
>
> I have stopped my order of 50 Nanostation M2 Loco devices because of this!
>
> I need OpenWrt support because AirOS doesn't support OLSR and BATMAN
> routing protocols, which we use in our community wifi network.
>
> There are hundreds of wifi communities like ours, with many thousands
> Ubiquiti devices, and we need 100% rock-solid support of OpenWrt
> running on your hardware. Ubiquiti has stopped delivering SDK so there
> is no more option to use AirOS + OLSR or BATMAN, now our only option
> is to completely replace AirOS with OpenWrt.
>
> So this change is a really big impact on all of us who can't use your
> hardware unless we have routing protocols our networks use!
>
> So please take OpenWrt support seriously, we are a base custome for
> your devices, which your marketing and develpment departements seam to
> not get or care about. Which is a shame because you are turning away
> your years long and loyal customers away by these kind of action.
>
> Please forward this message to your supperiors and ask them to join in
> the discussion on OpenWrt development mailing list or to provide
> direct emails on which they team leads can be contacted.
>
> Have a nice day.
>
>  *Moses F.* (Ubiquiti Networks)
>
> Jun 02 16:58
>
> Hi Valent,
>
> Thanks for getting in touch with us!
>
> Yes, we have come up with the new board for these devices. Just for easy
> understanding the devices with the xw firmware run on the latest
> motherboard. eg: http://www.ubnt.com/download#NanoStation:M5. You'll see
> two firmware here. The xw is for new board and the xm for the older devices.
>
> I'm not sure about the chip-set. I'll get the information and get back to
> you.
>
> Thanks for your patience!
>
> Moses F.
> Ubiquiti Networks
>
>*valent.turkovic*
>
> Jun 02 16:30
>
> I have heard from guys at Wlan Slovenia that you have changed chip on new
> models of Nanostation M2 from Atheros ar71xx to Atheros ar934x
>
>
> Could you please confirm or deny this information. Has there been any
> change in SoC that is used in Nanostation M2 and M2 Loco devices?
>
> Cheers,
> Valent.
>   This email is a service from Ubiquiti Networks.
>  Message-Id:1Q2V5JR6_538f9f164c0e1_1f103f8ead8c9ea417314f_sprut
>



-- 
follow me - www.twitter.com/valentt & http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com
linux, anime, spirituality, wireless, scuba, linuxmce smart home, zwave
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent.turko...@hotmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Support for Nanostation M2 devices

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Another confirmation that they have switched boards and probably also
SoC, from Ubnt forums:
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-General-Discussion/Differencens-between-XM-XW-and-TI-firmwares/td-p/752296/page/2

So nobody from dev team has worked on these new Ubiquiti devices?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Support for Nanostation M2 devices

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Got first reply from Ubiquiti support:

"Hi Valent,

Thanks for getting in touch with us!

Yes, we have come up with the new board for these devices. Just for
easy understanding the devices with the xw firmware run on the latest
motherboard. eg: http://www.ubnt.com/download#NanoStation:M5. You'll
see two firmware here. The xw is for new board and the xm for the
older devices.

I'm not sure about the chip-set. I'll get the information and get back to you.

Thanks for your patience!

Moses F.
Ubiquiti Networks"
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Support for Nanostation M2 devices

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

@Gregor from Wlan Slovenia showed mi his boot log and I found here some
references that other people are starting to notice change from ar724 to
ar934x on their Ubiquiti devices:
http://community.tanaza.com/tanaza/topics/installing_tanaza_firmware_on_unifi_ap
http://www.wifi4you.com/Amp/UBiQUiTi-Firmware.html

Maybe it takes some time for the paperwork to clear and to be show on FCC
website?


On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Felix Kaechele  wrote:

> On 03.06.2014 00:05 valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Did anybody have chance to test Nanostation M2 devices produced in 2014?
> > Is it true that Ubiquiti changes SoC type and that current model is not
> > supported in OpenWrt?
>
> Well I have some 4 NSM2 and 6 NSM5 loco manufactured in August 2013 and
> they do work with OpenWRT.
> Where did you gather this information that UBNT has changed the SoC
> type? I for one think it's very unlikely that UBNT would change the SoC
> on an existing product, assuming that will probably require them to go
> through all regulatory tests again.
> Also the FCC website shows that they haven't filed any changes for the
> NSM device series. So that makes it even more unlikely the board has
> changed.
>
> Regards,
>   Felix
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>



-- 
follow me - www.twitter.com/valentt & http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com
linux, anime, spirituality, wireless, scuba, linuxmce smart home, zwave
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent.turko...@hotmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Support for Nanostation M2 devices

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Gregor from wlan slovenia says that new Nanostation devices now have
Atheros ar934x and not ar71xx any more...
Is ar934x supported in OpenWrt?


On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:05 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Did anybody have chance to test Nanostation M2 devices produced in 2014?
> Is it true that Ubiquiti changes SoC type and that current model is not
> supported in OpenWrt?
>



-- 
follow me - www.twitter.com/valentt & http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com
linux, anime, spirituality, wireless, scuba, linuxmce smart home, zwave
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent.turko...@hotmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Support for Nanostation M2 devices

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Did anybody have chance to test Nanostation M2 devices produced in 2014? Is
it true that Ubiquiti changes SoC type and that current model is not
supported in OpenWrt?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ideal battery for solar nodes?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Depending on the type of node usage would be 5, 10 and 15W for three
typical nodes. Hope this helps.

-- 
follow me - www.twitter.com/valentt & http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com
linux, anime, spirituality, wireless, scuba, linuxmce smart home, zwave
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent.turko...@hotmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] ideal battery for solar nodes?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

How do you calculate ideal battery for solar nodes? I know that it depends
on how much routers there are planned. But for example let's use solar node
that has one nanostation nanobridge for unplink and picostation for AP.

I guess that 50W solar panel should be enough, right? But how big should
the battery be?

Is 7Ah enough?

At my company we use 92Ah batteries for powering ADSL DSLAMs, and are
replacing then now with new ones. Using a too big battery is also not
advised because then you need much bigger solar panels because lead battery
also looses lots of power due it's internal resistance.

So 92Ah is much too big, but is 7Ah too small? Does anybody have experience
with batteries and solar power?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Initial Support for Ubiquiti UniFi Outdoor Plus

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 2:33 AM, David Hutchison wrote:

> I was able to get the Ubiquiti UniFi Outdoor Plus to boot into OpenWRT
> today, however I need some assistance writing a patch for it. There
> are two things that need to happen:
>
> First of all, this is how I got it to work:
>
> Modify target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile:
>
>
--- Makefile.bak2014-04-04 17:01:40.929134535 -0700
>


> 
>


> I would like some help testing and creating a valid patch. 1.) I don't
> know if you need to modify the flash driver in the newer kernel, can
> someone confirm trunk has support for the en25qh128 flash chip? 2.)
> Should we use "UAPPRO" since the flash layout seems to be the same on
> both the PRO and UBNT Outdoor Unifi Plus? Is that a valid approach as
> far as the Makefile is concerned? 3.) If the flash chip change is not
> needed in the latest trunk, is the first patch I provided sufficient
> for Initial UniFi Outdoor Plus support?
>
> -- Davey
>

Has there been any progress? I'm considering getting one UAP-Outdoor+ but
it is not cheap, so it is not an impulse decision. I would like to help and
test and get this hardware supported under OpenWrt, if anybody has means to
send at least two devices for testing I'll work on getting them supported
under OpenWrt.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Wiki is down again...

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

I would like to help with sysadmin task, who can I contact?


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:32 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It is really bad guys;
> https://www.diigo.com/item/image/1aki/wrth
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:16 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
> valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm tracking few websites with uptime webapp on RedHats free instance of
>> Openshift and it works awesome...
>>
>> I see that OpenWrt Wiki has lots of stability issues:
>> http://i.imgur.com/pkOIVTX.png
>>
>> Who are sysadmins who take care of the wiki? Is there anything I can help
>> with?
>>
>
>
>
> --
> follow me - www.twitter.com/valentt & http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com
> linux, anime, spirituality, wireless, scuba, linuxmce smart home, zwave
> ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent.turko...@hotmail.com
>



-- 
follow me - www.twitter.com/valentt & http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com
linux, anime, spirituality, wireless, scuba, linuxmce smart home, zwave
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent.turko...@hotmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Wiki is down again...

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

It is really bad guys;
https://www.diigo.com/item/image/1aki/wrth


On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:16 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com <
valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm tracking few websites with uptime webapp on RedHats free instance of
> Openshift and it works awesome...
>
> I see that OpenWrt Wiki has lots of stability issues:
> http://i.imgur.com/pkOIVTX.png
>
> Who are sysadmins who take care of the wiki? Is there anything I can help
> with?
>



-- 
follow me - www.twitter.com/valentt & http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com
linux, anime, spirituality, wireless, scuba, linuxmce smart home, zwave
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent.turko...@hotmail.com
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Wiki is down again...

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

I'm tracking few websites with uptime webapp on RedHats free instance of
Openshift and it works awesome...

I see that OpenWrt Wiki has lots of stability issues:
http://i.imgur.com/pkOIVTX.png

Who are sysadmins who take care of the wiki? Is there anything I can help
with?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Bluetooth Low Energy support in OpenWRT

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Did anybody package updated version of bluetooth packages via this patch?
http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/2746/
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Ubiquiti Nanobeam

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hi,
did anybody get their hands on Ubiquiti Nanobeam equipment? Nanobeam is
very similar to Nanobridge but it has improved radio and antenna design,
and faster cpu.

Guys on the Ubiquiti forums are really stoked about how great they work:
http://community.ubnt.com/t5/Installation-Troubleshooting/NanoBeam-vs-NanoBridge/td-p/687967

If anybody has started working on supporting OpenWrt on these devices
please let me know and if I can help in any way.

Cheers,
Valent.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/3] kernel: add rtc-ds1672 module support

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hi, is there a chance of getting rtc kernel modue for ds1307 ?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] rsyslog vs syslogng

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Is there any plan to swith from syslogng to rsyslog in some future OpenWrt
release?

I'm investigating how to log my devices and it seams that syslogng is
subpar solution on devices that have intermittent connection.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but with syslogng when connection goes down
syslogng still tries to sent all log messages but they fail and don't get
resent when connection gets back.

rsyslog has feature to keep logs locally and to sync them to remote rsyslog
server when connection comes back.

This seams like perfect fit for OpenWrt, so is there some other reason why
syslogng is prefered choice? Does rsyslog use too much resources that
aren't available to most OpenWrt based devices?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] is anybody working on supporting Linksys WRT1900ac ?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:17 AM, John Crispin  wrote:

> On 12/01/14 11:09, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I see no mention of this router on dev mailing list, so is this article
>> true:
>> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/
>> 01/linksys-resurrects-classic-blue-router-with-open-source-and-300-price/
>>
>> and also in tekzilla video Linksys/Belkin claims that this router will
>> have OpenWrt support first day it comes out:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vV6IkvXUZUU
>>
>> Is anybody of OpenWrt devs working with Linksys to support this router?
>> Are any of you on NDAs to can't mention this? :)
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> we talked about this internally and are not aware of any developer that
> was pinged by linksys. what we know so far
>
> * unit most likely runs on a ghz arm soc made by marvell
> * unit is about 1,5x the size of the original
> * the unit is really expensive - you can get a time capsule for that price
> with a 2TB disc or even a low end qnap
>
>
> lets see if they actually contact us or if it was a marketing hoax
>
> John
>


Thought so, so I sent a few tweets to linksys, tekizilla, patrick norton,
cnet and CES, asking then why they didn't check the sources before
releasing this info regarding openwrt support (ah, journalism)

on a side note, I really like sata port they put on this device, are there
any other devices with openwrt support that have sata ports?

My prediction is that after they figure out there is no way this thing will
sell at that price point they will ship a "light" version with almost same
specs at ~150$ price range

Also on a tangent - on openwrt forums guys mentioned this as a alternative
AC router which is much cheaper (but also not yet released) -
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2037429657/almond-80211ac-touchscreen-wifi-router-smart-home
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2037429657/almond-80211ac-touchscreen-wifi-router-smart-home/posts/611489
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] is anybody working on supporting Linksys WRT1900ac ?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

I see no mention of this router on dev mailing list, so is this article
true:
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/01/linksys-resurrects-classic-blue-router-with-open-source-and-300-price/

and also in tekzilla video Linksys/Belkin claims that this router will have
OpenWrt support first day it comes out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vV6IkvXUZUU

Is anybody of OpenWrt devs working with Linksys to support this router? Are
any of you on NDAs to can't mention this? :)
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] setsid is not included by default in busybox, why?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hi,
default busybox is missing setsid tool that is used creating bacground
daemon processes.

Is there a reason why it is not included by default?

If there are no good reasons I'll write a simple patch that would
include it by default in next build releases.

Are you using some other ways to create background daemon processes
other than using setsid ?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] procd usage examples

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Thanks. Using some (maybe flawed) logic I deducted that bluetooth
devices should all have product='a12/1/*' so I'll match with that.
Hope this info helps also others reading this later...
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] procd usage examples

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

sorry for the missing link:

[1] http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/techref/hotplug#troubleshoot
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] procd usage examples

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:44 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
 wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Yousong Zhou  wrote:
>> On 23 December 2013 04:26, valent.turko...@gmail.com
>>  wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I see that procd is being used by OpenWrt but wiki documentation is
>>> lacking some basic examples how could it be used further by advanced
>>> users (not developers).
>>>
>>> One use case would be to trigger some action when some usb device is
>>> being connected or disconnected... how could procd be used in such use
>>> case?
>>
>> Functionality of hotplug2 was included in procd. User interface is
>> almost the same.  Only the file `/etc/hotplug2.rules' was replaced
>> with `/etc/hotplug.json'.  See wiki page [1].
>>
>> Please correct me if I was wrong.
>>
>> [1] http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/techref/hotplug
>>
>>
>> yousong
>
> Thanks a lot for this info, it has helped a lot!
>
> After poking around for a bit I got the basics of it. Hotplug scripts
> try to decide what type of device has been connected (usb serial port,
> button, 3g stick, wifi dongle, etc...) and then they runs some
> specific scripts for each different type of device and event
> (up/down), right?
>
> But how can I make hotplug/procd recognise bluetooth dongle device? It
> lookls like current /etc/hotplug.json script doesn't handle bluetooth
> dongles, right? So how to add support so that bluetooth dongles get
> recognised correctly ?

After adding hotplug troubleshooting on wiki [1] and creating hotplug
debug script I saw this for two different bluetooth dongles:


action='add' product='a12/1/1915' type='224/1/1' interface=''
action='add' product='a12/1/1915' type='224/1/1' interface='224/1/1'
action='add' product='a12/1/1915' type='224/1/1' interface='224/1/1'
action='add' product='a12/1/1915' type='224/1/1' interface='254/1/0'
action='remove' product='a12/1/1915' type='224/1/1' interface='224/1/1'
action='remove' product='a12/1/1915' type='224/1/1' interface='224/1/1'
action='remove' product='a12/1/1915' type='224/1/1' interface='254/1/0'
action='remove' product='a12/1/1915' type='224/1/1' interface=''
action='add' product='a12/1/134' type='224/1/1' interface=''
action='add' product='a12/1/134' type='224/1/1' interface='224/1/1'
action='add' product='a12/1/134' type='224/1/1' interface='224/1/1'

I was expecting to see "hci0" as interface because this is what
hcitool and hciconfig report as bluetooth interface. Is interface 224
bluetooth specific interface? Is there anything here I could make
hotplug detect bluetooth dongle from other types of usb devices?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] procd usage examples

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Yousong Zhou  wrote:
> On 23 December 2013 04:26, valent.turko...@gmail.com
>  wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I see that procd is being used by OpenWrt but wiki documentation is
>> lacking some basic examples how could it be used further by advanced
>> users (not developers).
>>
>> One use case would be to trigger some action when some usb device is
>> being connected or disconnected... how could procd be used in such use
>> case?
>
> Functionality of hotplug2 was included in procd. User interface is
> almost the same.  Only the file `/etc/hotplug2.rules' was replaced
> with `/etc/hotplug.json'.  See wiki page [1].
>
> Please correct me if I was wrong.
>
> [1] http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/techref/hotplug
>
>
> yousong

Thanks a lot for this info, it has helped a lot!

After poking around for a bit I got the basics of it. Hotplug scripts
try to decide what type of device has been connected (usb serial port,
button, 3g stick, wifi dongle, etc...) and then they runs some
specific scripts for each different type of device and event
(up/down), right?

But how can I make hotplug/procd recognise bluetooth dongle device? It
lookls like current /etc/hotplug.json script doesn't handle bluetooth
dongles, right? So how to add support so that bluetooth dongles get
recognised correctly ?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] procd usage examples

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hi,
I see that procd is being used by OpenWrt but wiki documentation is
lacking some basic examples how could it be used further by advanced
users (not developers).

One use case would be to trigger some action when some usb device is
being connected or disconnected... how could procd be used in such use
case?

I'll add all this info on the wiki just give me something to go on :)

Thanks.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How badly broken is bluetooth on OpenWrt ?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

I have tested bluetooth also on wr703n tplink router which is atheros
based and I also get kernel panic crashes...
This looks like badly broken usb stack or bluetooth stack issue. Any
other ideas?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How badly broken is bluetooth on OpenWrt ?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich  wrote:
> The crash / disconnect issues are more likely related to the infamous
> dwc_otg host driver. It is unlikely to be a problem with the bluetooth
> stack itself.
>
> ~ Jow

Jow you are right, it looks like it is general usb issue and not only
specific to bluetooth. Can you please elaborate on dwc_otg host
driver, is it know to be really bad and have issues? I would like to
use some device with rock solid usb support. Would you suggest I move
away from Carambola device (based on Ralink RT3050F) maybe even
generally from Ralink based devices?

Do Atheros based devices have better usb support?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How badly broken is bluetooth on OpenWrt ?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Martijn Zilverschoon
 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What happens when you try to connect the bluetooth dongle trough an
> active powered hub?
>
> -Fried

First I switched to trunk and got much better results, now l2ping
doesn't cause kernel panic just stops pinging after some time:

# l2ping 6C:9B:02:2F:67:AA
Ping: 6C:9B:02:2F:67:AA from 00:1F:81:00:02:00 (data size 44) ...
0 bytes from 6C:9B:02:2F:67:AA id 0 time 120.70ms
0 bytes from 6C:9B:02:2F:67:AA id 1 time 44.33ms
0 bytes from 6C:9B:02:2F:67:AA id 2 time 35.71ms
0 bytes from 6C:9B:02:2F:67:AA id 3 time 35.78ms
0 bytes from 6C:9B:02:2F:67:AA id 4 time 35.79ms
Send failed: Connection reset by peer


When I use powered hub then serial console gets really, really slow,
under 1 character per second. Any ideas why?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] usb disconnect every 5 minutes - know issue ?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:17 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
 wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> can you try with an external powered hub ?
>>>>>
>>>>> John
>
> I have two powered usb hubs, one cheap chinese and premium DLink one,
> and when I use them then usb bluetooth dongle doesn't even came up!
>
> I can't get it up with command "hciconfig hci0 up" any ideas why?!?

Here is an very interesting update, when using trunk then I don't see
disconnects so I continued using trunk instead of AA.

When I connect powered usb hub and connect over serial port console
gets really, really slow, around one character per second. Why does
external usb hub slowdown how fast serial console works?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] usb disconnect every 5 minutes - know issue ?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

 Hi,

 can you try with an external powered hub ?

 John

I have two powered usb hubs, one cheap chinese and premium DLink one,
and when I use them then usb bluetooth dongle doesn't even came up!

I can't get it up with command "hciconfig hci0 up" any ideas why?!?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] How badly broken is bluetooth on OpenWrt ?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hi,
I have no previous experience with bluetooth on openwrt but from my
experience in last few days of serious testing bluetooth stack on
openwrt I can only say with really high confidence that bluetooth is
badly broken on openwrt (atleast on one platform).

Do you have experience with stable bluetooth connections on openwrt?
On which platform?

There was almost no bluetooth documentation beside few blog and forum
posts here and there so I decided o start a new wiki page:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/usb.bluetooth

Please join in and help create better documentation that would be
realy valuable to lots of people.

Currentd device I'm using is Carambola [1] with Attitude Adjustment
12.09 and I'm getting weird bluetooth issues all the time...

USB device keeps disconnecting and reconnecting, other bluetooth
devices don't even get recognized and then I get kernel panics and
reboots during l2pings:

root@OpenWrt:/# hcitool scan
Scanning ...
AC:72:89:6A:66:99snow

root@OpenWrt:/# l2ping AC:72:89:6A:66:99
Ping: AC:72:89:6A:57:29 from 00:1F:81:00:02:00 (data size 44) ...
44 bytes from AC:72:89:6A:57:29 id 0 time 34.78ms
44 bytes from AC:72:89:6A:57:29 id 1 time 10.23ms
44 bytes from AC:72:89:6A:57:29 id 2 time 18.26ms
44 bytes from AC:72:89:6A:57:29 id 3 time 27.02ms
44 bytes from AC:72:89:6A:57:29 id 4 time 14.60ms
44 bytes from AC:72:89:6A:57:29 id 5 time 25.77ms
[  104.79] dwc_otg: Device Not Supported
[  105.04] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 2
[  105.04] CPU 0 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
address 00200200, epc == 80e86710, ra == 80e86704
[  105.05] Oops[#1]:
[  105.05] Cpu 0
[  105.05] $ 0   :   00200200 80f3da00
[  105.05] $ 4   : 80f3da00 80f3da60 0001 0001
[  105.05] $ 8   : 80080005 80080005 80f3da00 0001
[  105.05] $12   : 0004 80080004 0001 
[  105.05] $16   : 80f3da00 80ea4000 80f3da00 80ea1134
[  105.05] $20   : 80ea1138 81a651ec 001f 81a6549c
[  105.05] $24   :  800339b0
[  105.05] $28   : 81bf6000 81bf7c80 81b57e00 80e86704
[  105.05] Hi: 00e2
[  105.05] Lo: 0003
[  105.05] epc   : 80e86710 0x80e86710
[  105.05] Tainted: G   O
[  105.05] ra: 80e86704 0x80e86704
[  105.05] Status: 1100a403KERNEL EXL IE
[  105.05] Cause : 008c
[  105.05] BadVA : 00200200
[  105.05] PrId  : 0001964c (MIPS 24KEc)
[  105.05] Modules linked in: btusb hci_uart hidp bnep rfcomm
bluetooth hid evdev ledtrig_usbdev nf_nat_irc nf_conntrack_irc
nf_nat_ftp nf_conntrack_ftp ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat nf_nat pppoe
xt_conntrack xt_CT xt_NOTRACK iptable_raw xt_state nf_conntrack_ipv4
nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_conntrack pppox ipt_REJECT xt_TCPMSS ipt_LOG
xt_comment xt_multiport xt_mac xt_limit iptable_mangle iptable_filter
ip_tables xt_tcpudp x_tables tun ppp_async ppp_generic slhc vfat fat
rt2800pci(O) rt2800lib(O) rt2x00soc(O) rt2x00pci(O) rt2x00lib(O)
nls_iso8859_1 nls_cp437 mac80211(O) crc_itu_t crc_ccitt eeprom_93cx6
cfg80211(O) compat(O) arc4 aes_generic usb_storage dwc_otg ehci_hcd
sd_mod ext4 jbd2 mbcache usbcore usb_common scsi_mod nls_base crc16
crypto_algapi leds_gpio button_hotplug(O) gpio_keys_polled
input_polldev input_core
[  105.05] Process khubd (pid: 397, threadinfo=81bf6000,
task=81b94850, tls=)
[  105.05] Stack : 80ea1138 81a651ec 001f 80e9b6e0 80f3da00
80ea4448 0009 80ea1134
[  105.05] 80ea1138 80e868c8 80e31eb0 8026 0001
80e31eb0 80f3da00 800c0aa0
[  105.05] 80ea4008 80ea4000 80ea4020 80ea4418 
80e818d0 81bf7d40 0002
[  105.05] 81bf7d00 8000  80ea4000 80ea4014
81b76f00  80e84900
[  105.05] 0001 800c1248  0005 80d99500
80ea4000 80ea4014 80e24078
[  105.05] ...
[  105.05] Call Trace:[<80e9b6e0>] 0x80e9b6e0
[  105.05] [<80e868c8>] 0x80e868c8
[  105.05] [<800c0aa0>] 0x800c0aa0
[  105.05] [<80e818d0>] 0x80e818d0
[  105.05] [<80e84900>] 0x80e84900
[  105.05] [<800c1248>] 0x800c1248
[  105.05] [<80e24078>] 0x80e24078
[  105.05] [<80c2acd0>] 0x80c2acd0
[  105.05] [<8002e588>] 0x8002e588
[  105.05] [<80132f10>] 0x80132f10
[  105.05] [<80132fa8>] 0x80132fa8
[  105.05] [<801f7534>] 0x801f7534
[  105.05] [<80133028>] 0x80133028
[  105.05] [<80132af8>] 0x80132af8
[  105.05] [<8013056c>] 0x8013056c
[  105.05] [<80c299f4>] 0x80c299f4
[  105.05] [<80c20bcc>] 0x80c20bcc
[  105.05] [<80c23220>] 0x80c23220
[  105.05] [<80c21354>] 0x80c21354
[  105.05] [<80c241e8>] 0x80c241e8
[  105.05] [<80032eb8>] 0x80032eb8
[  105.05] [<8002912c>] 0x8002912c
[  105.05] [<80c23ca8>] 0x80c23ca8
[  105.05] [<80028b04>] 0x80028b04
[  105.05] [<800033d0>] 0x800033d0
[  105.05] [<80028a7c>] 0x80028a7c
[  105.05] [<800033c0>] 0x800033c0
[  105.05]
[  105.05]
[  105.05] Code: 8e42

[OpenWrt-Devel] usb disconnect every 5 minutes - know issue ?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Hi guys, not sure if this issue I'm seeing is a know one or not. I
searched for similar bugs but haven't seen this.

I'll open a new bug if it is needed.

I'm using Carambola [1] device with Attitude Adjustment 12.09 which is
based upon Ralink chipset.

Usb bluetooth dongle gets disconnected every 4.5~6.5 minutes and then
gets new usb device number. Not it came up to device number 13.

When it disconnects then kernel log shows a bunch of:
dwc_otg: Device Not Supported

this is how these message look like:
[ 3551.49] usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 12 using dwc_otg
[ 3935.75] dwc_otg: Device Not Supported
[ 3936.00] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 12
[ 3936.04] dwc_otg: Device Not Supported
[ 3936.08] dwc_otg: Device Not Supported
[ 3943.05] dwc_otg: Device Not Supported
[ 3943.09] dwc_otg: Device Not Supported
[ 3943.09] dwc_otg: Device Not Supported
[ 3943.65] usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 13 using dwc_otg

and this is the history overview:
# dmesg |grep usb
[  825.97] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 2
[  832.78] usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 3 using dwc_otg
[ 1229.47] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 3
[ 1236.28] usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 4 using dwc_otg
[ 1628.72] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 4
[ 1635.91] usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 5 using dwc_otg
[ 1948.22] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 5
[ 1953.89] usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 6 using dwc_otg
[ 2187.75] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 6
[ 2195.09] usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 7 using dwc_otg
[ 2589.22] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 7
[ 2595.65] usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 8 using dwc_otg
[ 2991.50] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 8
[ 2999.57] usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 10 using dwc_otg
[ 3385.22] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 10
[ 3392.41] usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 11 using dwc_otg
[ 3544.22] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 11
[ 3551.49] usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 12 using dwc_otg
[ 3936.00] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 12
[ 3943.65] usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 13 using dwc_otg


Is this material for a new bug?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Target for Carambola missing ?!?

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:05 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
 wrote:
> Hi guys and galls (if present),
> how do you compile image for Carambola when it's target is missing?
>
> ls target/linux/ramips/rt305x/profiles/
> 00-default.mk  allnet.mk  aztech.mk  belkin.mk  engenius.mk
> freestation5.mk  tenda.mk  upvel.mk
>
> But how is then carambola image compiled when it is present here:
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/attitude_adjustment/12.09/ramips/rt305x/openwrt-ramips-rt305x-carambola-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin
>
> I guess I'm missing something obvious...

I see that Tobias Diedrich has signed off when this new device was
added. So Tobias, am I doing something wrong or should I open a new
ticket if this is a bug?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel