Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/8] octeontx: remove static EXT2/3/4 FS support

2018-02-22 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2018-02-22 16:39, Tim Harvey wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:14 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> On 2018-02-22 09:34, Felix Fietkau wrote: >>> On 2018-02-22 01:12, Tim Harvey wrote: On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2018-02-20

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/8] octeontx: remove static EXT2/3/4 FS support

2018-02-22 Thread Tim Harvey
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:14 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2018-02-22 09:34, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> On 2018-02-22 01:12, Tim Harvey wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2018-02-20 19:23, Tim Harvey wrote: > We are using F2FS

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/8] octeontx: remove static EXT2/3/4 FS support

2018-02-22 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2018-02-22 09:34, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2018-02-22 01:12, Tim Harvey wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: >>> On 2018-02-20 19:23, Tim Harvey wrote: We are using F2FS as our overlay read/write FS. Others can be supported as modules.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/8] octeontx: remove static EXT2/3/4 FS support

2018-02-22 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2018-02-22 01:12, Tim Harvey wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> On 2018-02-20 19:23, Tim Harvey wrote: >>> We are using F2FS as our overlay read/write FS. Others can be supported >>> as modules. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/8] octeontx: remove static EXT2/3/4 FS support

2018-02-21 Thread Tim Harvey
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2018-02-20 19:23, Tim Harvey wrote: >> We are using F2FS as our overlay read/write FS. Others can be supported >> as modules. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey > I think it would be a good idea to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/8] octeontx: remove static EXT2/3/4 FS support

2018-02-21 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2018-02-20 19:23, Tim Harvey wrote: > We are using F2FS as our overlay read/write FS. Others can be supported > as modules. > > Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey I think it would be a good idea to leave in ext4. If the overlay storage area is too small for f2fs, fstools chooses