Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
Is there even a need to produce an oversize image warning? I'm not aware
of any other architecture that refuses to build over a certain size. x86
being the obvious exception, but that is different because it doesn't
target any particular device, but a whole
Hi Mark,
On 29/11/11 18:51, Dave Taht wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Mark Mentovai m...@moxienet.com wrote:
Jonathan Bennett wrote:
This patch seems like a really good idea for the ar71xx family. What
sorts of problems are preventing this from being implemented? As small
as it
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Mark Mentovai m...@moxienet.com wrote:
Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
Would you mind having another look at this patch as a priority, as it
causes images larger than 8MB to FTBFS.
While this obviously is not a problem for the WNDR3700, it is a problem
for the
Jonathan Bennett wrote:
This patch seems like a really good idea for the ar71xx family. What
sorts of problems are preventing this from being implemented? As small
as it sounds, an extra 192k would be really useful on quite a few
routers.
I don't know of any actual problems with the patch.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Mark Mentovai m...@moxienet.com wrote:
Jonathan Bennett wrote:
This patch seems like a really good idea for the ar71xx family. What
sorts of problems are preventing this from being implemented? As small
as it sounds, an extra 192k would be really useful on
Dave Taht wrote:
Awesome. However I'd like to somehow make for fully field-upgradable
kernels for this device (how to do that?), and reserving 64k strikes
me as too small to account for future growth.
It doesn't reserve 64kB. It doesn't really reserve anything at all.
There can be as little as
This replaces the fixed flash layout currently used on the WNDR3700
family with one whose mtd partition sizes are computed dynamically.
Rather than reserving 1MB for the kernel regardless of its actual space
requirements, this computes an appropriate size for the kernel, rounded
up to a 64kB erase
Awesome. However I'd like to somehow make for fully field-upgradable
kernels for this device (how to do that?), and reserving 64k strikes
me as too small to account for future growth.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Mark Mentovai m...@moxienet.com wrote:
This replaces the fixed flash layout
