Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PROPOSAL] move OpenWrt codebase to Git and GitHub

2016-06-07 Thread Jiapeng Li
I also agree with Luka. Github supplies a serious of features to make open source development more easier. Pull request, issue tracker etc. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PROPOSAL] move OpenWrt codebase to Git and GitHub

2016-06-01 Thread Saverio Proto
Hello, I am very happy about moving to Github. Saverio 2016-05-24 16:06 GMT+02:00 Luka Perkov : > Dear OpenWrt mailing list readers, > > as the subject says I'd like to make proposal to move the OpenWrt > codebase to Git. This was already discussed before [1] and now when >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PROPOSAL] move OpenWrt codebase to Git and GitHub

2016-05-25 Thread Luka Perkov
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:29:30AM -0700, David Lang wrote: > OpenWRT has already moved to using Git instead of SVN, No, it has not. To users is exposed the Git frontend while the commits are made to the SVN repo. > so why do they need to move from hosting the git repository themselves to >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PROPOSAL] move OpenWrt codebase to Git and GitHub

2016-05-25 Thread Luka Perkov
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:51:46AM -0500, Eric Schultz wrote: > My free-software side worries about using something non-free like drone.io > for CI but this is a huge task certainly and I'm not sure a free tool would > meet everyone's needs (plus there's the huge added burden of maintenance). The

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PROPOSAL] move OpenWrt codebase to Git and GitHub

2016-05-24 Thread Roman Yeryomin
On 24 May 2016 at 18:51, Eric Schultz wrote: > I think this is a great idea! I very much support a move to Github; despite > it's issues, it's just where development is happening today. Keeping a > non-Github channel for submitting patches is also a great idea I

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PROPOSAL] move OpenWrt codebase to Git and GitHub

2016-05-24 Thread Daniel Dickinson
On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 16:20 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 16:46 +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > > Hi Luka, > > > > this is fantastic news! > > > > I'd be very interested in your future progress on the CI front. > > > Let's just not make the mistake other projects

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PROPOSAL] move OpenWrt codebase to Git and GitHub

2016-05-24 Thread Daniel Dickinson
On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 16:46 +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Hi Luka, > > this is fantastic news! > > I'd be very interested in your future progress on the CI front. > Let's just not make the mistake other projects make and turn CI into a an excuse to not have proper releases and a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PROPOSAL] move OpenWrt codebase to Git and GitHub

2016-05-24 Thread David Lang
On Tue, 24 May 2016, Luka Perkov wrote: Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 16:06:13 +0200 From: Luka Perkov <l...@openwrt.org> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org, openwrt-us...@lists.openwrt.org Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PROPOSAL] move OpenWrt codebase to Git and GitHub Dear OpenWrt mailing list r

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PROPOSAL] move OpenWrt codebase to Git and GitHub

2016-05-24 Thread Eric Schultz
I think this is a great idea! I very much support a move to Github; despite it's issues, it's just where development is happening today. Keeping a non-Github channel for submitting patches is also a great idea I think. My free-software side worries about using something non-free like drone.io for

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PROPOSAL] move OpenWrt codebase to Git and GitHub

2016-05-24 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi Luka, this is fantastic news! I'd be very interested in your future progress on the CI front. If drone.io is able to accommodate the resources required for building the entire OpenWrt then it sounds like a good solution for other projects too. Regards, Jo

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PROPOSAL] move OpenWrt codebase to Git and GitHub

2016-05-24 Thread Luka Perkov
Dear OpenWrt mailing list readers, as the subject says I'd like to make proposal to move the OpenWrt codebase to Git. This was already discussed before [1] and now when there are no blockers [2] for this change I'd like that we as a community move forward with this switch. Also, I'd like to