Gregers Petersen wrote:
My comment was also a way towards: Ok if this should be done, then it
needs to be done in an unconfusing manner - with a bit of thought and
planning towards how such a git repository is to be integrated into what
is already there ;-)
I totally agree, using git
Hey Imre,
Le Friday 23 May 2008 16:13:59 Imre Kaloz, vous avez écrit :
I share Gregers' view, too.. Also, one central git is a chaotic mess for
this, every target would need it's own branch.. Think ddwrt's repo :P
John and I had a short discussion about that on irc. Basically, the idea
behind
Axel Gembe wrote:
Imre Kaloz wrote:
I share Gregers' view, too.. Also, one central git is a chaotic mess for
this,
every target would need it's own branch.. Think ddwrt's repo :P
I dunno how the current situation differs because every target
effectively *IS* a branch from the generic
