OpenWRT and LEDE/[OpenWRT] folks: I do not have any interest of my own in
seeing particular individuals take upon certain roles or getting
privileges. I am not friends with anyone here. In fact, this is my first
submission to this forum. With respect to individuals and their roles, I am
a disintere
On 06/27/2016 11:39 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi Zoltan,
>
> we started a discussion on OpenWrt re-merge conditions over at lede-dev
> and waited for a while to solicit more feedback.
>
> Since no other people expressed further wishes and since you repeatedly
> asked for a list of things the
On 2016-06-27 11:56, mbm wrote:
> Am I correct in assuming that this is also a statement that the LEDE
> members will assist in accomplishing the tasks mentioned?
From my side, yes - as long as we agree about the tasks in question.
- Felix
___
openwrt-d
Hi Mike,
given sufficient and reasonable agreements I am certainly willing to
help implementing our desired changes.
Regards,
Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-de
Am I correct in assuming that this is also a statement that the LEDE
members will assist in accomplishing the tasks mentioned?
On 6/27/2016 2:39 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
Hi Zoltan,
we started a discussion on OpenWrt re-merge conditions over at lede-dev
and waited for a while to solicit more
Hi Zoltan,
we started a discussion on OpenWrt re-merge conditions over at lede-dev
and waited for a while to solicit more feedback.
Since no other people expressed further wishes and since you repeatedly
asked for a list of things the LEDE folks would like to see in OpenWrt
I'm going to summarize
, lede-adm
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 15:22:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5756c13c.6040...@uid0.hu>
References: <1465294394.3094.78.camel@homehost> <5756c13c.6040...@uid0.hu>
Face:
iVBORw0KGgoNSUhEUgAAADAwAQMAAABtzGvEBlBMVEX///8AAABVwtN+eklEQVQY04XQzQ2EIBAF4IdMDIc5UAIlUIKlWMr0ZiMm28jOj+6iMXE
On 2016-06-08 11:12, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
>> Which exact goal are you referring to? Imho a 'split' never happened,
>> everybody kept contributing to both projects.
> Let me argue with that:
>
> 2016-06-07: 08:59 Changeset [49379] by nbd
> treewide: fix replace nbd@… with nbd@… Signed-off-by: …
>
On 8 June 2016 at 11:12, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
> Daniel Golle wrote:
>> Which exact goal are you referring to? Imho a 'split' never happened,
>> everybody kept contributing to both projects.
>
> Let me argue with that:
>
> 2016-06-07: 08:59 Changeset [49379] by nbd
> treewide: fix replace nbd@… wit
Hey Daniel,
Daniel Golle wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:42:36PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
...
The official line - which I should have sent out a few days ago - from the
OpenWrt team is:
Felix's initial comment was LEDE to become a "development environment" for
new ideas, and
El 7/6/16 a las 14:42, Zoltan HERPAI escribió:
> Daniel Dickinson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had a few emails on this topic I thought better of sending, but I'm
>> sure I'm not the only one wondering why the remaining OpenWrt devs have
>> not responded to the various LEDE overtures on this mailing lis
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:42:36PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
> May I ask you to point to which e-mail are you referring to? We are
> yet to see an official line from LEDE on what they want to see to
> happen in OpenWrt.
>
i don't think you'll get anything more official than jow's mail from may
2
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016, Eric Schultz wrote:
Zoltan,
I'm pleased to hear there's been some movement. Does this mean that OpenWrt
is going to have releases while LEDE will not?
Considering that LEDE folks recently posted a "what's blocking the release"
message, this would be extremely unlikely.
Zoltan,
I'm pleased to hear there's been some movement. Does this mean that OpenWrt
is going to have releases while LEDE will not?
Eric
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
> Daniel Dickinson wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had a few emails on this topic I thought better of sending, bu
Hi!
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:42:36PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
> ...
> The official line - which I should have sent out a few days ago - from the
> OpenWrt team is:
>
>
> Felix's initial comment was LEDE to become a "development environment" for
> new ideas, and to keep OpenWrt as the st
Daniel Dickinson wrote:
Hi,
I had a few emails on this topic I thought better of sending, but I'm
sure I'm not the only one wondering why the remaining OpenWrt devs have
not responded to the various LEDE overtures on this mailing list. Is it
lack of time, an unwillingness to attempt to have an
iVBORw0KGgoNSUhEUgAAADAwAQMAAABtzGvEBlBMVEX///8AAABVwtN+eklEQVQY04XQzQ2EIBAF4IdMDIc5UAIlUIKlWMr0ZiMm28jOj+6iMXEOfBBmXgJAVLGlBkU3wcZ9I3Q7EdrAveowx6hZ0q6QJDsRnHlJwr+W4CHF7vLqTEenXABeUnSssbP8SdwdjTHEwcFDtQGKFuWjH8Lna8vAmfEF3NMPdAOsBscASUVORK5CYII=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=
17 matches
Mail list logo