Hello Denis,
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 7:31 PM Denis Kalashnikov wrote:
> When porting RB91xG ad hoc drivers (gpio-latch and rb91x-nand) from ar71xx
> to ath79, I made a decision to rework this to more clear design in my opinion:
> MFD driver that requests and controls the gpio lines, and separate
On 12.05.21 15:09, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Koen Vandeputte writes:
Hi Bjørn
I can confirm the slot can also handle pcie signaling.
Got a rb912 board laying on my desk this very moment running an extra
ath9k pcie card :-) (openwrt 19.07)
Thanks. Good to be wrong :-)
The slot is also advertised
Koen Vandeputte writes:
> Hi Bjørn
>
> I can confirm the slot can also handle pcie signaling.
> Got a rb912 board laying on my desk this very moment running an extra
> ath9k pcie card :-) (openwrt 19.07)
Thanks. Good to be wrong :-)
> The slot is also advertised by MikroTik that it can do
On 12.05.21 14:47, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Koen Vandeputte writes:
I've fixed most of the open stuff, with the exception of using a PCIe
device in the slot. (checking currently what is wrong there)
Are you sure that's supported? This is a slot intended only for LTE
modems, isn't it?
Looking at
Koen Vandeputte writes:
> I've fixed most of the open stuff, with the exception of using a PCIe
> device in the slot. (checking currently what is wrong there)
Are you sure that's supported? This is a slot intended only for LTE
modems, isn't it?
Looking at the picture at
Hi Denis,
I have high interest in this target device and wanted to provide some
assistance if that's ok with you.
I've fixed most of the open stuff, with the exception of using a PCIe
device in the slot. (checking currently what is wrong there)
Changes:
- dts cleanup
- Enabled USB
- Added
interesting. I have a rb92xx on my desk and am wondering if this would
also work ? after a brief glance at the code I think this might work.
the rb92xx certainly has the same latch setup ...
John
On 06.05.21 18:19, Denis Kalashnikov wrote:
When porting RB91xG ad hoc drivers (gpio-latch
When porting RB91xG ad hoc drivers (gpio-latch and rb91x-nand) from ar71xx
to ath79, I made a decision to rework this to more clear design in my opinion:
MFD driver that requests and controls the gpio lines, and separate NAND
driver and GPIO-latch driver that uses API of the MFD driver (like
how
When porting RB91xG ad hoc drivers (gpio-latch and rb91x-nand) from ar71xx
to ath79, I made a decision to rework this to more clear design in my opinion:
MFD driver that requests and controls the gpio lines, and separate NAND
driver and GPIO-latch driver that uses API of the MFD driver (like
how
