Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] IPv6 firewall and Port Control Protocol (Was: Barrier Breaker 14.07-rc1)

Hi Gui, On Jul 16, 2014, at 20:10 , Gui Iribarren g...@altermundi.net wrote: On 16/07/14 12:09, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 08:41:50AM -0300, Gui Iribarren wrote: then, what happens when those devices are deployed in a myriad of real-world scenarios? hackers rejoice!

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] IPv6 firewall and Port Control Protocol (Was: Barrier Breaker 14.07-rc1)

Hello Benjamin, On July 17, 2014 7:45:10 PM CEST, Benjamin Cama ben...@dolka.fr wrote: Le mercredi 16 juillet 2014 à 21:12 +0200, Sebastian Moeller a écrit : What is so wonderful about IPv6? Maleware surely will evolve quickly to take advantage of a dropped layer of defense… “Layer

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] IPv6 firewall and Port Control Protocol (Was: Barrier Breaker 14.07-rc1)

Hi Karl, On July 17, 2014 11:40:52 PM CEST, Karl P ka...@tweak.net.au wrote: On 07/17/2014 08:26 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: I argue that people unable to change the router settings are better of with all unsolicited inbound traffic disabled. I've tried to avoid weighing

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] IPv6 firewall and Port Control Protocol (Was: Barrier Breaker 14.07-rc1)

Hi Gui, hi list,   Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Juli 2014 um 05:56 Uhr Von: Gui Iribarren g...@altermundi.net An: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Betreff: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] IPv6 firewall and Port Control Protocol (Was: Barrier Breaker 14.07-rc1) On 17/07/14 21:59, Fernando Frediani wrote: Perfect

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC PATCH] packages: Smart Queue Management for AQM Packet Scheduling and Qos from CeroWrt

Hi Weedy, On Oct 2, 2014, at 05:46 , Alpha Sparc alphasp...@gmail.com wrote: How good is the throughput on CeroWrt compared to OpenWrt ? I assume you are talking about the pure routing performance with no firewall/NAT and traffic-shaping involved? I think they pretty much are equal

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Cerowrt-devel] better ingress shaping somehow

Hi Dave, On Oct 3, 2014, at 01:07 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: [cut a lot...] But: the real killer, on ingress shaping, is the call to skb_clone in sch_ingress-act_mirred path, I think. So I thought that we basically have around 50Mbps “shaping-capability” on the wndrs

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Cerowrt-devel] [RFC PATCH] packages: Smart Queue Management for AQM Packet Scheduling and Qos from CeroWrt

Hi Richard, On Oct 6, 2014, at 18:02 , Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote: On 10/02/2014 10:05 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: I assume you are talking about the pure routing performance with no firewall/NAT and traffic-shaping involved? I think they pretty much are equal

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC PATCH] packages: Smart Queue Management for AQM Packet Scheduling and Qos from CeroWrt

Hello Stephan, On Oct 9, 2014, at 01:01 , Stephan Günther steph.guent...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Hannu Nyman hannu.ny...@iki.fi wrote: Dave Taht wrote on Thu Oct 2 03:49:15 CEST 2014: So I don't know where to go. Certainly I'd like to see the battle hardened

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Frequent adsl disconnections with BTHOMEHUBV2B (lantiq xway danube)

Hi Jaime, maybe you should also look at the rror counters. Especially the CRC and HEC errors short before the connection drops might be interesting. Best Regards Sebastian On Nov 16, 2014, at 15:43 , Jaime T enopa...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 November 2014 20:46, Michael Richardson

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Frequent adsl disconnections with BTHOMEHUBV2B (lantiq xway danube)

Hi Richard, hi Jaime On Nov 17, 2014, at 12:33 , Richard Mortimer richm+open...@oldelvet.org.uk wrote: Hi, On 15/11/2014 10:40, Jaime T wrote: Hi all. I'm running barrier breaker (r42625) on a BTHOMEHUBV2B and it's great apart from frequent adsl disconnections (approx 40 per day). My

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Frequent adsl disconnections with BTHOMEHUBV2B (lantiq xway danube)

Hi Michael, On Nov 17, 2014, at 18:39 , Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca wrote: Richard Mortimer richm+open...@oldelvet.org.uk wrote: I think I saw something similar when I was using an ADSL connection. When the connection was under full load (I don't remember whether it was

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Frequent adsl disconnections with BTHOMEHUBV2B (lantiq xway danube)

Hi Jaime, not an expert on adel modem errors, let alone lantiq, here is my attempt at helping out: On Nov 20, 2014, at 17:26 , Jaime T enopa...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 November 2014 18:36, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Jaime, maybe you should also look at the rror counters

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Frequent adsl disconnections with BTHOMEHUBV2B (lantiq xway danube)

Hi Jaime, On Nov 21, 2014, at 12:49 , Jaime T enopa...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 November 2014 20:49, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Jaime, not an expert on adel modem errors, let alone lantiq, here is my attempt at helping out: Hi Sebastien. Thank you for trying to help me - I

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] tmpfs /tmp size how to change.

HI Pawel, On Dec 12, 2013, at 21:47 , Pawel Pastuszak pawelpastus...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am using pretty much the trunk version of openwrt and i want to adjust the tmpfs /tmp size? I recall in old version of openwrt it was in 10_essential_fs but the new version i cannot find it.

[OpenWrt-Devel] report of sysupgrade incompatibility with mount-utils

Sebastian Moeller ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] report of sysupgrade incompatibility with mount-utils

Hi John, On Dec 17, 2013, at 12:51 , John Crispin j...@phrozen.org wrote: On 17/12/13 12:49, Sebastian Moeller wrote: replacing all invocations of mount with /usr/mount i think this would be the correct approach. So, should I send a patch? Against what version, or should I

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] report of sysupgrade incompatibility with mount-utils

Hi John, On Dec 18, 2013, at 11:42 , John Crispin j...@phrozen.org wrote: On 18/12/13 11:41, Sebastian Moeller wrote: So, should I send a patch? Against what version, or should I contact the maintainer (do you happen to know who that would be?) Hi, that would be me, i will fix

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v6] Add sysfixtime init script, replacement of luci_fixtime

Hi Etienne, On Jan 6, 2014, at 13:01 , Etienne CHAMPETIER etienne.champet...@free.fr wrote: Simply scan for the most recent file in /etc and set system time to this file modification time if it's in the future It allow some time dependent program to work immediatly without waiting for ntpd

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v6] Add sysfixtime init script, replacement of luci_fixtime

regards, Stefan 2014/1/6 Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de Hi Etienne, On Jan 6, 2014, at 13:01 , Etienne CHAMPETIER etienne.champet...@free.fr wrote: Simply scan for the most recent file in /etc and set system time to this file modification time if it's in the future It allow

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] is anybody working on supporting Linksys WRT1900ac ?

Hi John, On Jan 21, 2014, at 21:41 , John Crispin j...@phrozen.org wrote: On 21/01/2014 21:35, James Cloos wrote: JC == John Crispin j...@phrozen.org writes: JC * unit most likely runs on a ghz arm soc made by marvell IIRC, semiaccurate reported that it uses an atom processor.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Evenly distribute bandwidth for users?

Hi there, On Jan 11, 2013, at 05:16 , Brian J. Murrell wrote: On 13-01-11 07:29 AM, etienne.champet...@free.fr wrote: Hi http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/packet.scheduler/packet.scheduler Note that OP described wanting to distribute download bandwidth for users. The document you

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] SQM QOS Feedback and configuration questions

Hello Derek, Thanks for trying SQM. On Dec 28, 2014, at 03:29 , Derek Vicky thewerth...@gmail.com wrote: I've installed and configured the SQM QOS module for my Bleeding Edge, r43718 access point. The access point runs on the sunxi A20 processor with 1 Ethernet and 1 USB powered Wifi

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Cerowrt-devel] [sqm-scripts] not started at boot?

is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as # published by the Free Software Foundation. # # Copyright (C) 2012-4 Michael D. Taht, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, Sebastian Moeller . /lib/functions.sh STOP=$1

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Cerowrt-devel] [sqm-scripts] not started at boot?

Hi Toke, hi Alan, On Feb 15, 2015, at 17:18 , Toke Høiland-Jørgensen t...@toke.dk wrote: Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de writes: Not that I have shown great taste in the past, but I think it would be somewhat cleaner to put the logic into the hot plug script and keep run.sh “simple

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Cerowrt-devel] [sqm-scripts] not started at boot?

Hi Alan, On Feb 15, 2015, at 15:39 , Alan Jenkins alan.christopher.jenk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Toke I tried installing sqm-scripts from trunk, on Barrier Breaker on my wndr3800. It's very effective, but I notice SQM isn't applied at boot time. The system log complains about pppoe-wan

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Cerowrt-devel] [sqm-scripts] not started at boot?

Hi Toke, On Feb 15, 2015, at 16:56 , Toke Høiland-Jørgensen t...@toke.dk wrote: Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de writes: I am not sure that this works as intended. The first thing run.sh does is take down all running SQM instances: Ah yes, seems I was a bit too trigger-happy

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Is PPPoE broken in Barrier Breaker?

Hi Valent, On Mar 25, 2015, at 15:54 , valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: Hahahaha, I'm so embarrassed :) And thank you very, very much! Don’t be embarrassed! But, please, post the resolution of your issue to the openwrt forum topic as well, so the solution is well documented for

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Chaos Calmer 15.05-rc3

Hi, great news the RC3 announcement. thanks a lot. On Jul 16, 2015, at 17:11 , ql li gxfc...@gmail.com wrote: AQM inflexible, overly complex set Could you elaborate a bit? Which AQM system do you find inflexible, qos-scripts or sqm-scripts? Complex to set up, I wonder? Both systems

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Make-wifi-fast] OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] fq_codel_drop vs a udp flood)

Hi David, On May 16, 2016 10:46:25 AM GMT+02:00, David Lang wrote: >On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote: > >> On 16 May 2016 at 11:12, David Lang wrote: >>> On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote: >>> On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht

[OpenWrt-Devel] Is printf considered to be guaranteed?

Dear Developers, for a function for sqm-scripts I would very much like to use printf from inside a shell script. I would also like for sqm-scripts to keep working on all "compliant" openwrt builds. So here is my question, can I rely on the printf binary (or a link to the busybox fprintf) to be

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Is printf considered to be guaranteed?

Dear Luiz, thank you very much for this information. By now I have realized that printf evaluated locale (specifically LC_NUMERIC) at least on non-openwrt unices, which makes it unfortunately unusable for my purpose. Best Regards Sebastian > On Oct 11, 2018, at 19:58, Luiz Angelo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Is printf considered to be guaranteed?

Dear mhei, > On Oct 12, 2018, at 20:53, Michael Heimpold wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018, 22:44:53 CEST schrieb Sebastian Moeller: >> Dear Luiz, >> >> thank you very much for this information. By now I have realized that printf >> evaluate

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

Dear Jérôme, > On Sep 29, 2018, at 10:53, Jérôme Benoit wrote: > > Le 28/09/2018 à 18:55, Rosen Penev a écrit : >> >> So in kernel 4.17 I believe landed flow offloading support. This >> accomplishes something similar to SFE while being a proper upstream >> solution. This is already

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC] stop accepting 4/32M board patches

> On Dec 7, 2018, at 08:29, Shaleen Jain wrote: > > Hi, > > [...] > The point about these boards requiring a lot of modification to be useful is > simply not true. > I have a TP-Link tl-wr841n-v11 running the master branch with kernel 4.14 > with luci > and sqm-scripts + miniupnpd with no

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Typo: sysupgarde

Please see https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=commit;h=4bd9d331e5854e8325fd3b7a5f14e355a6a3c66d for why the typo disappeared from master > On Jan 12, 2019, at 21:56, Petr Štetiar wrote: > > Thomas Endt [2019-01-12 09:32:43]: > > Hi, > >> FYI: There is a typo in 3 files:

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Notes on (dangerous ?) sysupgrade

Mmmh, I have a hunch a recent observation of mine might be related (unfortunately I have no log data): Within a set of recent master builds, sysupgrade from a system running for a few days resulted in the expected behavior in that sysupgrade disconnected the current ssh connection and the LED

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.07 release schedule ?

> On Oct 16, 2019, at 21:54, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > > Hi, > >> Does it impact OpenWrt ? or just some OpenWrt based distributions ? >> (might influence who need to fix this ;) ) > > it impacts the usage of the kmod compatibility repositories - apparently > they're completely ignored by

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.07 release schedule ?

Thanks for the update. On October 11, 2019 12:59:04 PM GMT+02:00, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: >Hi Bjørn, > >> Or: Start discussing the release blockers here and now. Thanks. > >1) Blocker: LuCI master needs to be backported to 19.07 > Time estimate: 2-3 weeks > >2) Blocker: All relevant

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] lantiq: add dsl line_state mapping

Hi Florian, > On Jun 16, 2020, at 14:18, Florian Eckert wrote: > > Hi Adrian, > > thanks for your comment > >>> - "0xd00")s="resync" ;; >>> - "0x3c0")s="short init entry" ;; >>> - "") s="not running daemon"; ls="0xfff" ;; >>> -

Re: [PATCH 1/1] ltq-vdsl-app: add line_state number and power_state number

Smal typo? Mumber instead of Number? Best Regards Sebastian > On Mar 9, 2021, at 12:36, Florian Eckert wrote: > > With the old ubus dsl API, the numbers for the individual line_states and > power_states were also returned. These were not ported to the new DSL > C-API. This commit

Question regarding default qos_map_set (a5e3def1822431ef6436cb493df77006dbacafd6)

Dear Felix, with great joy did I notice that you enabled the qos_map_set feature of hostapd and supply a new default map that aligns OpenWrt's DSCP-2-AC mapping with RFC8325 Cimmit: a5e3def1822431ef6436cb493df77006dbacafd6 hostapd: add wmm qos map set by default This implements the mapping

Re: packet captures of sony's new 80Mbit service?

Hi Mark, > On Oct 11, 2023, at 21:05, Mark Thurston wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 18:04:41 +0100 Dave Taht wrote --- >> Anyone got a ps4 or ps5 and can take a packet capture at their router? >> Dying to know if it is cubic or bbr in particular >> > > Sorry if this is a silly comment

Re: Query regd. rw rootfs

Not that I would know, being a user not a developer > On Jun 16, 2022, at 13:33, Ravi Paluri (QUIC) > wrote: > > Hi jo, > >>> it is not the same. There is no special handling for specific overlay file >>> paths in procd. > If the behavior is not same, can you let me know how "below" is

Re: DSA Mini-tutorial still marked as Work In Progress

Hi Jo, I was under the impression* that bridge-vlan filtering is something that can be relegated to the switch hardware, while creating a bridge between VLAN interfaces happens in software. Is that wrong? Regards Sebastian *) Not sure where I got that impression from > On Sep 7,

Re: Help untangling CAKE settings for FTTH

HI T. > On Nov 16, 2022, at 11:22, Thibaut wrote: > > Hi, > > A few questions for the CAKE experts here: Quick note, this is not necessarily the best place to get advice on cake, both the cake mailing list and the OpenWrt forum tend to be directer paths to the "bakers". > > I’m

Re: Help untangling CAKE settings for FTTH

Hi T. > On Nov 16, 2022, at 12:46, Thibaut wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > Thanks for your reply. > >> Le 16 nov. 2022 à 11:49, Sebastian Moeller a écrit : >> >> HI T. >> >> >> >>> On Nov 16, 2022, at 11:22, Thibaut wrote:

Re: Help untangling CAKE settings for FTTH

t;> Le 16 nov. 2022 à 11:49, Sebastian Moeller a écrit : >> >> HI T. >> >> >> >>> On Nov 16, 2022, at 11:22, Thibaut wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> A few questions for the CAKE experts here: >> >>

Re: Help untangling CAKE settings for FTTH

Hi Thibaut, > On Nov 17, 2022, at 16:00, Thibaut wrote: > > > >> Le 17 nov. 2022 à 15:42, Sebastian Moeller a écrit : >> >> Hi Thibaut, >> >>> On Nov 17, 2022, at 15:22, Thibaut wrote: >>> >>> Hi Sebastian, >>> &g

Re: Help untangling CAKE settings for FTTH

Hi Thibaut, > On Nov 17, 2022, at 15:22, Thibaut wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > >> Le 17 nov. 2022 à 10:50, Sebastian Moeller a écrit : >> >> Hi T. >> >> >> so taking your proposa under consideration I canged the section that threw >&

Re: Help untangling CAKE settings for FTTH

Hi Thibaut, > On Nov 17, 2022, at 16:53, Thibaut wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > >> Le 17 nov. 2022 à 16:19, Sebastian Moeller a écrit : >> >> Hi Thibaut, > > [...] >>>>> Although I must confess that it certainly feels counter-intuitive that

[OT] Re: Additional container registry mirror [Was: Re: Sunsetting the Docker `openwrtorg` org (not `openwrt` org)]

> On Apr 15, 2023, at 10:19, Petr Štetiar wrote: > > Paul Spooren [2023-04-15 02:02:24]: > > Hi, > >> I’d simply disable it instead of no longer updating it, any other opinions? > > fine with me, thanks for taking care. I would simply announce it in several > places, that there is a plan

Re: 22.03.3 for mvebu (Turris Omnia)

MVEBU devices are not supported in kernel 5.10 based OpenWrt22.03.3 due to a bug. The fix is already in 5.15, but seems to intrusive to backport. Current snapshot builds are on kernel 5.15 already and the issue does not exist anymore. So the easy ways forward are: 1) stick to 22.03.2 2) switch